Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: whattajoke; metmom; MrB; valkyry1; Fichori; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; Elsie; CottShop; ...
As I do with every single “anti-evolution” quote from creationist writings, I looked this up.

How would you determine if it's NOT "anti-evolution" if it's not from a creationsist, say if it was this so called "peer review of evolution" I continue to hear about, and how do you tell the difference?

Also, if a paper was submitted by a creationist or an evolutionist, how would you tell the difference between "peer review", vs. "anti-evolution", if there were no name attached to the paper and it was submitted anonymously?

Lastly, is a creation scientist "allowed" to "peer review" evolution, or is it always labeled "anti-evolution", and does this work in reverse?

Because I keep hearing, even by you on this very thread today, about creation scientists submitting their ID papers for this so-called "peer review"...is this paper up for peer review among only the creation scientists or only evolution scientists or both; or is it ALWAYS and forever to be labeled as "anti-creation science" when it is "peer reviewed" by evolution scientists and "peer review" when reviewed by creation scientists?

56 posted on 02/19/2009 1:09:54 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: tpanther
How would you determine if it's NOT "anti-evolution" if it's not from a creationsist, say if it was this so called "peer review of evolution" I continue to hear about, and how do you tell the difference?

Also, if a paper was submitted by a creationist or an evolutionist, how would you tell the difference between "peer review", vs. "anti-evolution", if there were no name attached to the paper and it was submitted anonymously?

Lastly, is a creation scientist "allowed" to "peer review" evolution, or is it always labeled "anti-evolution", and does this work in reverse?

Because I keep hearing, even by you on this very thread today, about creation scientists submitting their ID papers for this so-called "peer review"...is this paper up for peer review among only the creation scientists or only evolution scientists or both; or is it ALWAYS and forever to be labeled as "anti-creation science" when it is "peer reviewed" by evolution scientists and "peer review" when reviewed by creation scientists?

Say what? Answers to your questions are readily available to you online. You have much to learn regarding the process of getting a real paper published in a real journal.
92 posted on 02/19/2009 5:00:33 PM PST by whattajoke (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson