To: allmendream
I just checked my New Testament, and the subtitle is not: “Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.”
208 posted on
02/23/2009 12:48:01 PM PST by
Cedric
To: Cedric
Races refers to varieties within a population, not different human populations differentiated by skin color.
But nice attempt at misreading a word used in the 1860’s with an eye to the modern meaning.
Is your understanding of the subject really as shallow as THAT?
212 posted on
02/23/2009 12:53:37 PM PST by
allmendream
("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
To: Cedric; allmendream
"
I just checked my New Testament, and the subtitle is not: Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. "
And you take "Preservation of Favoured Races" to mean . . . ?
214 posted on
02/23/2009 12:57:27 PM PST by
YHAOS
To: Cedric
Evo-Atheists like people to forget that fact! Darwin was talking about “favoured races”, which he assumed he a member. That’s exactly what he meant and what his disciples have pushed! Hitler was just following the direct teachings of Darwin, who was inspired by Satan himself! Evo-atheists want to be the ones running the camps of the future. Their *science* can only lead to the gas chambers. Their bigotry can never be tolerated!
To: Cedric
And you take "Preservation of Favoured Races" to mean . . . ?
Please tell me you're kidding with this one! Please tell me you actually know that "races" 150 years ago in Darwin's vernacular dealt with "types" or species of animals. If you've actually ever read anything more than creationist claptrap, you'd read where Darwin wrote about the "races" of birds and snails and trees. My word you guys are hopeless.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson