Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

> I can hear you now at the OJ trial. “If you weren’t
> there, you must acquit.” Brilliant. Why hasn’t anyone
> else thought of this?

Ah, I see.

Conjecture based on fanciful assumptions of what may have occured in the distant past is as good as hard DNA evidence taken from a virtually contemporaneous event.

As you wish, but not a very brilliant analog.


356 posted on 02/23/2009 5:37:40 PM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies ]


To: Westbrook
Ah, I see.

Conjecture based on fanciful assumptions of what may have occured in the distant past is as good as hard DNA evidence taken from a virtually contemporaneous event.

As you wish, but not a very brilliant analog.

Uuuum... do you know anything about how researchers arrive at these "fanciful assumptions"?
361 posted on 02/23/2009 5:46:03 PM PST by ketsu (It’s not a campaign. It’s a taxpayer-funded farewell tour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook
Conjecture based on fanciful assumptions of what may have occured in the distant past is as good as hard DNA evidence taken from a virtually contemporaneous event.

Interesting parallel, since the same reasoning that assigns parenthood and kinship in court cases is evidence of kinship among all living things.

364 posted on 02/23/2009 5:57:36 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson