Yes, of course. Creationists must be tragically ignorant, simply uneducated, or just plain stupid if we dont ascribe to your materialistic story of origins.Science is inherently materialistic. That's why Crevos are so funny(and laughably ignorant) they keep trying to bang a big square peg(monotheism) into a little round hole(natural science or "materialism" as you like to call it).
Evolutionists have nothing if they dont have condescending invective.
Just like your pet theory, your narrative against your intellectual opponents has no basis in fact.
Many Creationists are college educated. Many Creationists hold advanced degrees. Many Creationists are successful in business, science, and engineering.
They are not the buck-toothed, google-eyed, mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging, drooling caricature you so much like to convey.
It's inherently paradoxical for a true scientist to be a creationist. Science *necessitates* materialism. Anybody that has actually studied reasoning should know that.
So *yes* Crevos are "tragically ignorant, simply uneducated or just plain stupid" as you so aptly put it.
> Science *necessitates* materialism.
That was not the opinion of Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Washington, and many, many others whose accomplishments dwarf those of Darwin.
I think you mean "young earth" creationists. God could have created the universe through the Big Bang and man through evolution. That's not inconsistent with Genesis, unless you take the literal "day" thing seriously.
So much for the the Bible and evolution being compatible fairy tale that the evos like to foist off an everyone.
Ah, you are back. You said "*everything* in science is false", with emphasis on "everything". According to you then, evolution is false, among other things.