Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are the States About to Slap the Runaway Fed Down to Constitutional Size?
Canada FREE Press ^ | February 25, 2009 | JB Williams

Posted on 02/25/2009 1:04:31 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: PlainOleAmerican

More than half of the population is a net beneficiary of socialist giveaway policies. Until things get so bad that this doesn’t matter, you won’t see a rebirth of old values. Even the Republican party is streaked through and through with statist tendencies. Why would most of the states suddenly be unified against Federal encroachment when a large portion of their population is for it? The infection is endemic, worse in blue states than red, but its almost everywhere.


41 posted on 02/25/2009 2:30:58 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nomad
We`ve been trying to get people to organize on the various state boards, but the response so far has been less than sterling. Help would be greatly appreciated.

I'm in Chicago. Let me know what I can do.

42 posted on 02/25/2009 2:32:00 PM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

“Until things get so bad that this doesn’t matter, you won’t see a rebirth of old values.”

So, lets make things much worse for them real fast.... They can’t have what we won’t give up. If the taxpayer cuts off the money supply, how does socialism sui8t them then?


43 posted on 02/25/2009 2:35:01 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

btt


44 posted on 02/25/2009 2:46:37 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
If the people of these states get behind them, they will pass.

Disagreeing with my assertion that the states don't have the courage to follow this movement through is your prerogative. However, resolutions are easy for any legislature to pass. It isn't necessary for the people to get behind a resolution since they are only theatrical gestures without any substance. Resolutions are not laws, and they have zero practical effect.

It's true that all movements have to start somewhere. However, this is 2009, an era when the states are so firmly tied to the federal tit financially that most states couldn't operate at all without those funds. The Civil War permanently changed the relationship between the states and the federal government they originally created. Toothless resolutions asserting states rights won't even put a tiny dent in the problem and, in fact, are like spitting into the teeth of a category 5 hurricane.

Just so you don't misunderstand me, I am 100% for a restoration of states rights. I just think these resolutions are pointless.

45 posted on 02/25/2009 2:47:36 PM PST by Wolfstar (Elections have thousands of consequences. Some minor, some major...and some that can kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

“Just so you don’t misunderstand me, I am 100% for a restoration of states rights. I just think these resolutions are pointless.”

I got your point, but you are still missing mine... If the people fail to get fully behind these resolutions, they will turn out to be useless. People who believe they are “useless” will make them “useless” by sitting on their hands.

It’s my experience that if you believe you CAN, you are right. But if you believe you CAN’T, you are also right.


46 posted on 02/25/2009 2:52:55 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
[I have been telling my Berekely student step-son that while he and his buddies are chasing corporate boogie-men and protesting for legal marijuana, they are going to miss the real revolution.]

Tell him that someone who was at Stanford during the student protests in the early 70s and hung around some of the Joan Baez and Black Panther sorts thinks you are right. It's property rights where the fight for freedom revolves, not hippie socialism (hey, I was part of that, it was and is a form of narcissism not revolution).

47 posted on 02/25/2009 2:53:34 PM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

“is a form of narcissism not revolution”

So right. I recently told him that he and his hippies are nothing but commie conformists.


48 posted on 02/25/2009 2:56:37 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jeffc; PlainOleAmerican
If 34 states do pass this and call for a Constitutional Convention...

It would be a disaster of immense proportions. I don't know what it is about conservatives, but they seem to latch onto these pie-in-the-sky movements and somehow think the Left won't participate and attempt to control the agenda.

We do not live in the patriot-rich 1770's, but the early 21st Century. Ours is a time when many millions of native-born Americans actually loathe this country and its Constitution. Exposing the Constitution to their tender mercies would be the destruction of us all.

49 posted on 02/25/2009 2:57:32 PM PST by Wolfstar (Elections have thousands of consequences. Some minor, some major...and some that can kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: vg0va3
Please educate me to what the path will be and where it leads.

Ooo ooo, I know. The path is The Path to Freedom and it leads to FREEDOM. What you do when you're there is up to you. AM I right?

50 posted on 02/25/2009 3:01:14 PM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight
The US was founded to live in peace, not to lead the world.

The United States of America has an obligation and responsibility to spread freedom and liberty throughout the world. It is the mandate of our leadership to do what is in the interest of the United States. Freedom and liberty the world over is most certainly in the interest of These United States of America.

51 posted on 02/25/2009 3:06:02 PM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

The Civil War may have started the trend, but it was the 17th amendment that effectively shut the states out from any meaningful voice in Washington. Repealing the 17th is the foundation of any true restoration of State’s rights.


52 posted on 02/25/2009 3:08:14 PM PST by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
If the people fail to get fully behind these resolutions, they will turn out to be useless.

You fail to get my point. A resolution (these or any others) has no force of law. There is nothing for the people to get behind. They are meaningless gestures.

Laws governing resolutions vary somewhat from state to state. Broadly, resolutions take care of legislative housekeeping functions; convey congratulations or condolences to individuals or groups in the state; express legislative intent; express an opinion or sentiment on matters of public interest; give direction to a state agency or official; or call upon certain governmental agencies, offices, or units such as the U.S. Congress to take a specific course of action.

Most resolutions are not sent to the governor (or president for congressional resolutions) for signature, and they cannot be vetoed. The vast majority of resolutions pass without the public ever even hearing word one about them.

53 posted on 02/25/2009 3:09:02 PM PST by Wolfstar (Elections have thousands of consequences. Some minor, some major...and some that can kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AustinBill
The Civil War may have started the trend, but it was the 17th amendment that effectively shut the states out from any meaningful voice in Washington. Repealing the 17th is the foundation of any true restoration of State’s rights.

I agree, and have been a leading -- often the only -- advocate for repeal of the 17th on FR for years. However, I am much more of a pragmatist than most who post here. The 17th will never be repealed. The most pratical thing those of us on the Right could do would be to find a way to organize a massive nationwide tax revolt. If it were at all possible to get tens of millions of taxpayers to simply not file in April and refuse to pay their taxes for even one fiscal year, we'd finally get the politicians' attention. We'd overwhelm the IRS system that way. The saying about strength in numbers may be old, but it's 100% true.

54 posted on 02/25/2009 3:15:11 PM PST by Wolfstar (Elections have thousands of consequences. Some minor, some major...and some that can kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2136635/posts

“Are you looking for a job?”

Note: This thread is updated on a regular basis.


55 posted on 02/25/2009 3:51:35 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar; Plain Old American
I agree, and have been a leading -- often the only -- advocate for repeal of the 17th on FR for years. However, I am much more of a pragmatist than most who post here. The 17th will never be repealed. The most pratical thing those of us on the Right could do would be to find a way to organize a massive nationwide tax revolt. If it were at all possible to get tens of millions of taxpayers to simply not file in April and refuse to pay their taxes for even one fiscal year, we'd finally get the politicians' attention. We'd overwhelm the IRS system that way. The saying about strength in numbers may be old, but it's 100% true.

I agree, Wolf. And that is just one more arrow in Liberty's quiver.

Amazing << Hear this. Feel this, and tell me that this isn't music.

Hey Barack HUSSEIN Obama, I went to Harvard too! That was the worst fieldtrip of my life, but I went there...


56 posted on 02/25/2009 4:51:49 PM PST by rdb3 (The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight

The USA was founded on the premise that a revolution is needed every 20 years.


57 posted on 02/25/2009 4:54:17 PM PST by reformedliberal (N0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Repealing the 17th Amendment would eliminate a lot of problems.


58 posted on 02/25/2009 4:55:08 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican; Jim Robinson; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; ..
Free Republic mentioned.


59 posted on 02/25/2009 4:58:54 PM PST by fanfan (God, Bless America, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
The cry baby would get on TV at least 3 or 4 times daily singing the blues.

Which would be different from his normal day in what way?

60 posted on 02/25/2009 5:03:05 PM PST by fanfan (God, Bless America, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson