Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush To Judgment (Mark Steyn On RNC Chairman's Michael Steele's View Of Rush Limbaugh Alert)
National Review ^ | 3/03/2009 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 03/03/2009 9:41:56 AM PST by goldstategop

Kathryn, in all the Rush-bashing, I was more disturbed by Michael Steele's wretched performance. His initial reaction — that Rush's show is "incendiary" and "ugly" — revealed:

a) that he never listens to it;

b) that he takes his cues from the mainstream media, for whom Rush is invariably "angry". They don't listen either. Rush is a lot of things, but "angry" isn't one of them. If you catch him for 20 minutes, you know he's full of fun, laughing it up, having a grand old time. There are a lot of angry talkshow hosts out there bellowing at the world for three hours a day, but Rush isn't one of them. (Full disclosure: I guesthost for Rush once in a while, and regard it as a signal honor for a sinister foreigner such as myself.)

This first reaction is disturbing for two reasons: first, given the size of Rush's audience, it's something an RNC chairman should not be so obviously foreign to; second, it's not encouraging when the de facto face of the party accepts so unthinkingly the liberal/media framing of the issue.

Then we come to Mr. Steele's second response - his reaction to the reaction to his original reaction: By apologizing for his first remarks, he opened the door for his DNC opposite number to make sport of the way he was kowtowing to the "ugly" Limbaugh. So a man who apparently shares the elite's disdain for Rush and his audience nevertheless feeds the impression that the Republican leadership is prostrate at his feet: the worst of both worlds.

In two brief soundbites, Mr. Steele has managed to suggest to his own party base that he has a lazy disposition that reflexively shares the liberal biases, and to allow the wider world to portray him as a craven squish. This is not encouraging. At the very minimum, he does not appear ready for primetime.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; cravensquish; incendiary; marksteyn; michaelsteele; msmdrivebys; nationalreview; republicanparty; rnc; rushlimbaugh; squish; steyn; thebase; ugly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Primetimedonna

See post #28. I posted it on his BLOG under “You Blew It!”.


41 posted on 03/03/2009 11:29:55 AM PST by bcsco (Illinois politicians should be read their Miranda rights when sworn in to office...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
Savage Nation, I consider angry

I listened to 'Savage Nation' for one entire show and part of another. I had to stop. In that period of time I had to conclude that he was neither pleased nor angry. He is simply a nut.

42 posted on 03/03/2009 11:30:18 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Don’t overlook Roger Hedgecock...
He has business experience along with his political experience.

I would love to see a Republican government with Tom Sullivan as Sec Treasury, also.


43 posted on 03/03/2009 11:31:59 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I listed last fall to JC Watts on Hannity give his opinion that it would be so great to see a black man make it as president.

JC has fallen in heights I did not foresee as he is another black and white politician who grades people by the color of their skin.


44 posted on 03/03/2009 11:49:40 AM PST by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Steele’s penance should be to spend three hours a day listening to the Rush Limbaugh show so he can get a clue. His sucking up to Democrats got him nowhere in his run for the Senate in Maryland and he apparently didn’t learn his lesson.


45 posted on 03/03/2009 11:53:11 AM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Does Michael Steele understand conservatism?

No but he has a firm grasp on the Rap culture.


46 posted on 03/03/2009 11:54:20 AM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Oh man...when the Great One is on a rant....I have to turn my iPod down on BART because people can actually hear every word he’s saying....


47 posted on 03/03/2009 1:06:55 PM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal

Maybe the Bay Area folks should listen to “The Great One” and learn. It’s their fault that we have Nasty Pelosi!


48 posted on 03/03/2009 1:17:28 PM PST by alice_in_bubbaland (Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Let the Revolution Commence!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Rush is conservative, not Republican, except by coincidence.
Savage works radio, which is a “hot” medium. Rush is often agitated, as are Beck, Levin, etc.


49 posted on 03/03/2009 1:22:35 PM PST by steve8714 (Drill for oil, drill for gas, drill to heat water in the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

When Michael Savage gets angry it’s usually because he sees justice being destroyed or some group hurting an innocent person or when political correctness is wounding a worthy institution.

There is such a thing as righteous anger.


50 posted on 03/03/2009 1:27:56 PM PST by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider
No, I'm not willing to throw Steele out. He snapped at some bait like a whole bunch of GOPers do. I'm willing to wait and see if he's learned anything. And if he learns something, that'll be a plus to his leadership.

I'm OK with giving MS the benefit of a doubt, that he was playing "good cop" and trying to get some sympathy going and he ended up screwing the pooch.

So, I'm till with ya, Mike. Watch out for the next pooch.

51 posted on 03/03/2009 2:12:15 PM PST by Mamzelle (Boycott Peggy Swoonin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

I believe he’s winning his time slot in the Bay Area.


52 posted on 03/03/2009 2:24:36 PM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stevem
I really, really wonder if Steele is asking himself, "What happened?" Plus he is asking himself the corollary question, "Am I really this stupid?"

I suggest he's like most pols, he's sitting back thinking "Who do these mouthy jerks think they are? I'm in charge and I don't need a bunch of Limbaugh lackeys second guessing me."

Tis a shame we can't find qualified individuals to seize the tiller and stear the S.S. (R)nc off the reef.
53 posted on 03/03/2009 2:33:38 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

stear = steer.

/sigh


54 posted on 03/03/2009 2:33:57 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

I have seen Steele be good like at the GOP convention last year. So I will give him the benefit of the doubt for now. But as Steyn says, this smack of Steele buying into the DC view of the world. That is not good in the leader of the RNC.


55 posted on 03/03/2009 2:37:37 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

the solution here is a no-brainer. Rush should do a live 30 minute on-air interview with Steele.


56 posted on 03/03/2009 2:58:56 PM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Excellent. Not a word needs to be changed. Great job!

An idea: forward it to Michelle Malkin -- maybe she'll post it on her website.

57 posted on 03/03/2009 3:56:16 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Shery
I am disappointed, but I’d have to agree that he is not. I’d love to see JC Watts take a more prominent stage in politics.

Did Mr. Watts ever decide who he was going to vote for in the last pres election?

58 posted on 03/03/2009 4:12:49 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Who did Watts decide to vote for in the last pres election?


59 posted on 03/03/2009 4:14:55 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I don't know. Was it a tough choice for him?

ML/NJ

60 posted on 03/03/2009 4:23:02 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson