Skip to comments.
McCain Amendment defeated in Senate 32-63
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00074 ^
Posted on 03/03/2009 10:27:47 AM PST by cc2k
McCain proposed this ammendment to H.R.1105:
From Page S2608 of the Congressional Record:
|
|
Mr. MCCAIN. Madam President, I
send an amendment to the desk and
ask for its immediate consideration.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
clerk will report the amendment.
The assistant legislative clerk read
as follows:
The Senator from Arizona [Mr. MCCAIN]
proposes an amendment numbered 592.
(Purpose: To continue funding at fiscal year
2008 levels through the end of fiscal year
2009)
Strike all after the enacting clause and
insert the following:
SECTION 1. CONTINUING 2008 FUNDING LEVELS.
Section 106(3) of Public Law 110329 is
amended by striking March 6, 2009 and inserting
September 30, 2009.
|
|
The vote was:
From http://www.senate.gov/...vote=00074:
|
|
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 1st Session as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate Vote Summary
|
Question: On the Amendment (McCain Amdt. No. 592 ) |
|
Vote Number: |
74 |
Vote Date: |
March 3, 2009, 12:01 PM |
|
Required For Majority: |
1/2 |
Vote Result: |
Amendment Rejected |
|
Amendment Number: |
S.Amdt. 592 to H.R. 1105 (Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009) |
|
Statement of Purpose: |
In the nature of a substitute. |
|
Vote Counts: |
YEAs |
32 |
|
|
NAYs |
63 |
|
|
Not Voting |
4 |

Alphabetical by Senator Name
|
Akaka (D-HI), Nay Alexander (R-TN), Nay Barrasso (R-WY), Yea Baucus (D-MT), Nay Bayh (D-IN), Yea Begich (D-AK), Nay Bennet (D-CO), Nay Bennett (R-UT), Nay Bingaman (D-NM), Nay Bond (R-MO), Nay Boxer (D-CA), Nay Brown (D-OH), Nay Brownback (R-KS), Yea Bunning (R-KY), Yea Burr (R-NC), Yea Burris (D-IL), Nay Byrd (D-WV), Nay Cantwell (D-WA), Nay Cardin (D-MD), Nay Carper (D-DE), Nay Casey (D-PA), Nay Chambliss (R-GA), Yea Coburn (R-OK), Yea Cochran (R-MS), Nay Collins (R-ME), Nay Conrad (D-ND), Not Voting Corker (R-TN), Yea Cornyn (R-TX), Yea Crapo (R-ID), Yea DeMint (R-SC), Yea Dodd (D-CT), Nay Dorgan (D-ND), Nay Durbin (D-IL), Nay |
Ensign (R-NV), Yea Enzi (R-WY), Yea Feingold (D-WI), Nay Feinstein (D-CA), Nay Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay Graham (R-SC), Yea Grassley (R-IA), Yea Gregg (R-NH), Yea Hagan (D-NC), Nay Harkin (D-IA), Nay Hatch (R-UT), Yea Hutchison (R-TX), Yea Inhofe (R-OK), Yea Inouye (D-HI), Nay Isakson (R-GA), Yea Johanns (R-NE), Not Voting Johnson (D-SD), Nay Kaufman (D-DE), Nay Kennedy (D-MA), Not Voting Kerry (D-MA), Nay Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay Kohl (D-WI), Nay Kyl (R-AZ), Yea Landrieu (D-LA), Nay Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay Leahy (D-VT), Nay Levin (D-MI), Nay Lieberman (ID-CT), Nay Lincoln (D-AR), Nay Lugar (R-IN), Yea Martinez (R-FL), Yea McCain (R-AZ), Yea McCaskill (D-MO), Yea |
McConnell (R-KY), Yea Menendez (D-NJ), Nay Merkley (D-OR), Nay Mikulski (D-MD), Nay Murkowski (R-AK), Nay Murray (D-WA), Nay Nelson (D-FL), Nay Nelson (D-NE), Nay Pryor (D-AR), Nay Reed (D-RI), Nay Reid (D-NV), Nay Risch (R-ID), Yea Roberts (R-KS), Yea Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay Sanders (I-VT), Nay Schumer (D-NY), Nay Sessions (R-AL), Not Voting Shaheen (D-NH), Nay Shelby (R-AL), Nay Snowe (R-ME), Nay Specter (R-PA), Nay Stabenow (D-MI), Nay Tester (D-MT), Nay Thune (R-SD), Yea Udall (D-CO), Nay Udall (D-NM), Nay Vitter (R-LA), Yea Voinovich (R-OH), Yea Warner (D-VA), Nay Webb (D-VA), Nay Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay Wicker (R-MS), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Nay |

Grouped By Vote Position
|
YEAs ---32 |
|
Barrasso (R-WY) Bayh (D-IN) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burr (R-NC) Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) |
Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Isakson (R-GA) Kyl (R-AZ) Lugar (R-IN) |
Martinez (R-FL) McCain (R-AZ) McCaskill (D-MO) McConnell (R-KY) Risch (R-ID) Roberts (R-KS) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Wicker (R-MS) |
|
NAYs ---63 |
|
Akaka (D-HI) Alexander (R-TN) Baucus (D-MT) Begich (D-AK) Bennet (D-CO) Bennett (R-UT) Bingaman (D-NM) Bond (R-MO) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Burris (D-IL) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Cochran (R-MS) Collins (R-ME) Dodd (D-CT) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) |
Feingold (D-WI) Feinstein (D-CA) Gillibrand (D-NY) Hagan (D-NC) Harkin (D-IA) Inouye (D-HI) Johnson (D-SD) Kaufman (D-DE) Kerry (D-MA) Klobuchar (D-MN) Kohl (D-WI) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (ID-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Menendez (D-NJ) Merkley (D-OR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murkowski (R-AK) |
Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Schumer (D-NY) Shaheen (D-NH) Shelby (R-AL) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stabenow (D-MI) Tester (D-MT) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Warner (D-VA) Webb (D-VA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wyden (D-OR) |
|
Not Voting - 4 |
|
Conrad (D-ND) Johanns (R-NE) |
Kennedy (D-MA) Sessions (R-AL) |
|

Grouped by Home State
|
Alabama: |
Sessions (R-AL), Not Voting |
Shelby (R-AL), Nay |
|
Alaska: |
Begich (D-AK), Nay |
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay |
|
Arizona: |
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea |
McCain (R-AZ), Yea |
|
Arkansas: |
Lincoln (D-AR), Nay |
Pryor (D-AR), Nay |
|
California: |
Boxer (D-CA), Nay |
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay |
|
Colorado: |
Bennet (D-CO), Nay |
Udall (D-CO), Nay |
|
Connecticut: |
Dodd (D-CT), Nay |
Lieberman (ID-CT), Nay |
|
Delaware: |
Carper (D-DE), Nay |
Kaufman (D-DE), Nay |
|
Florida: |
Martinez (R-FL), Yea |
Nelson (D-FL), Nay |
|
Georgia: |
Chambliss (R-GA), Yea |
Isakson (R-GA), Yea |
|
Hawaii: |
Akaka (D-HI), Nay |
Inouye (D-HI), Nay |
|
Idaho: |
Crapo (R-ID), Yea |
Risch (R-ID), Yea |
|
Illinois: |
Burris (D-IL), Nay |
Durbin (D-IL), Nay |
|
Indiana: |
Bayh (D-IN), Yea |
Lugar (R-IN), Yea |
|
Iowa: |
Grassley (R-IA), Yea |
Harkin (D-IA), Nay |
|
Kansas: |
Brownback (R-KS), Yea |
Roberts (R-KS), Yea |
|
Kentucky: |
Bunning (R-KY), Yea |
McConnell (R-KY), Yea |
|
Louisiana: |
Landrieu (D-LA), Nay |
Vitter (R-LA), Yea |
|
Maine: |
Collins (R-ME), Nay |
Snowe (R-ME), Nay |
|
Maryland: |
Cardin (D-MD), Nay |
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay |
|
Massachusetts: |
Kennedy (D-MA), Not Voting |
Kerry (D-MA), Nay |
|
Michigan: |
Levin (D-MI), Nay |
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay |
|
Minnesota: |
Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay |
|
|
Mississippi: |
Cochran (R-MS), Nay |
Wicker (R-MS), Yea |
|
Missouri: |
Bond (R-MO), Nay |
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea |
|
Montana: |
Baucus (D-MT), Nay |
Tester (D-MT), Nay |
|
Nebraska: |
Johanns (R-NE), Not Voting |
Nelson (D-NE), Nay |
|
Nevada: |
Ensign (R-NV), Yea |
Reid (D-NV), Nay |
|
New Hampshire: |
Gregg (R-NH), Yea |
Shaheen (D-NH), Nay |
|
New Jersey: |
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay |
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay |
|
New Mexico: |
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay |
Udall (D-NM), Nay |
|
New York: |
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay |
Schumer (D-NY), Nay |
|
North Carolina: |
Burr (R-NC), Yea |
Hagan (D-NC), Nay |
|
North Dakota: |
Conrad (D-ND), Not Voting |
Dorgan (D-ND), Nay |
|
Ohio: |
Brown (D-OH), Nay |
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea |
|
Oklahoma: |
Coburn (R-OK), Yea |
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea |
|
Oregon: |
Merkley (D-OR), Nay |
Wyden (D-OR), Nay |
|
Pennsylvania: |
Casey (D-PA), Nay |
Specter (R-PA), Nay |
|
Rhode Island: |
Reed (D-RI), Nay |
Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay |
|
South Carolina: |
DeMint (R-SC), Yea |
Graham (R-SC), Yea |
|
South Dakota: |
Johnson (D-SD), Nay |
Thune (R-SD), Yea |
|
Tennessee: |
Alexander (R-TN), Nay |
Corker (R-TN), Yea |
|
Texas: |
Cornyn (R-TX), Yea |
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea |
|
Utah: |
Bennett (R-UT), Nay |
Hatch (R-UT), Yea |
|
Vermont: |
Leahy (D-VT), Nay |
Sanders (I-VT), Nay |
|
Virginia: |
Warner (D-VA), Nay |
Webb (D-VA), Nay |
|
Washington: |
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay |
Murray (D-WA), Nay |
|
West Virginia: |
Byrd (D-WV), Nay |
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay |
|
Wisconsin: |
Feingold (D-WI), Nay |
Kohl (D-WI), Nay |
|
Wyoming: |
Barrasso (R-WY), Yea |
Enzi (R-WY), Yea |
|
|
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Alaska; US: Maine; US: Mississippi; US: Missouri; US: Pennsylvania; US: Tennessee; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: fy2009; mccain; mcsame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-93 next last
If your Republican Senator voted against this, they need to hear from you. If you live in a state that went for McCain, but you have a Dem Senator that voted against this, they need to hear from you.
The Republicans that need to be scolded are:
- Alexander (R-TN)
- Bennett (R-UT)
- Bond (R-MO)
- Cochran (R-MS)
- Collins (R-ME)
- Murkowski (R-AK)
- Shelby (R-AL)
- Snowe (R-ME)
- Specter (R-PA)
1
posted on
03/03/2009 10:27:47 AM PST
by
cc2k
To: cc2k
IMO, Hatch and Bennett are using a tag-team approach to a lot of these issues. Hatch votes for one, then Bennett (especially on election years) that way they only take part of the grief for poor votes and can spin stuff by saying, "but I voted against the other bad bill".
I get the feeling from these guys that they are just playing a shell game.
2
posted on
03/03/2009 10:31:12 AM PST
by
batter
(Wolverines!)
To: cc2k
Politicians are such scumbags. I hope the Republicans who voted for this get hauled over the coals by the citizens of their states.
3
posted on
03/03/2009 10:34:48 AM PST
by
txnativegop
(God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
To: cc2k
"The Republicans that need to be scolded are: " Change SCOLDED to :" SEVERELY WATERBOARDED WITHIN AN INCH OF THIER SOON TO BE OVER RINO POLITICAL LIVES" , and I'm with ya.
4
posted on
03/03/2009 10:35:11 AM PST
by
musicman
(Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: batter
That’s the vast majority of Republican Party politics in a nutshell.
Why should they want smaller government? They’re IN government.
5
posted on
03/03/2009 10:35:14 AM PST
by
LearsFool
("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
To: batter
All those Republicans listed needs to go. They’re either too socialist, or too power hungry and playing politics. Either way, we don’t want them around
6
posted on
03/03/2009 10:36:56 AM PST
by
4rcane
To: cc2k
Specter, Collins and Snowe, bought and paid for. They are *owned* by the dems.
7
posted on
03/03/2009 10:37:31 AM PST
by
mojitojoe
(None are more hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free.)
To: 4rcane
Alexander (R-TN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Not just scolded. KICKED OUT of the Republican party
8
posted on
03/03/2009 10:37:57 AM PST
by
4rcane
To: cc2k
It isn’t difficult to imagine how each of these politcians would fare were they running their own businesses and actually INCREASED spending while business was in a downturn.
9
posted on
03/03/2009 10:40:55 AM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(The inmates are now officially running the asylum.)
To: 4rcane
Bond is worthless, since he is retiring after he finished his term. I am not surprised by his vote.
To: stockpirate; ChrisInAR; AvOrdVet; MaggieCarta; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; djsherin; ...
|

|
The Juan McCain Truth File. "I have great respect for Al Gore." John McCain, October 2, 2008 FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords. This can be a very high-volume ping list at times. To join the ping list: FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add mccaintruthfile. (Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.) Republican Commissars Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless GOP shills who simply want to meet a new overlord. |
|
11
posted on
03/03/2009 10:41:52 AM PST
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: cc2k
Bayh voted for i t??
My jaw just hit the space bar...
12
posted on
03/03/2009 10:42:12 AM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: cc2k
So this amendment would have frozen spending at 2008 levels?
13
posted on
03/03/2009 10:44:30 AM PST
by
TomasUSMC
( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
To: Abathar
14
posted on
03/03/2009 10:48:54 AM PST
by
benjibrowder
(Looking forward to kicking Obama out of office in 2012.)
To: LearsFool
Why should they want smaller government? Theyre IN government. For life, usually.
15
posted on
03/03/2009 10:50:20 AM PST
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: rabscuttle385
Talk about derangement syndrome. You can’t just disagree with someone over an issue and then give credit when due. The man tries to do something worthy, and all you can do is stike the same cord.
I disagree with him on the border/illegal immigration and a few more, but this was an action that he should be commended for, not condemned for.
When he said that he had great respect for Al Gore, did you bother to find out what type of respect? Did he respect him as a former VP? I don’t have any respect for Gore, but I respect the office. You should find out how things work.
Oh, and don’t bother sending any nasty you’re-not-a conservative/real-American nonsense. You’d be wrong on all of it.
16
posted on
03/03/2009 10:51:40 AM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: TomasUSMC
Looks like it. Good for him for trying.
17
posted on
03/03/2009 10:52:24 AM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
To: TomasUSMC
The main purpose was to extend the extension of last year’s budget. This would allow time for debate over the new godzilla budget.
But NOOOOOOOO, we wouldn’t want to give the public time to see what’s hidden in the new budget.
19
posted on
03/03/2009 10:53:30 AM PST
by
2111USMC
To: oneamericanvoice
Talk about derangement syndrome. You cant just disagree with someone over an issue and then give credit when due. The man tries to do something worthy, and all you can do is stike the same cord.I never said that I agreed or disagreed with McCain. The "post" you are referring to is the banner for the ping list. If any of the folks on the ping list have something to say about McCain's amendment, fine, whatever, but at least they know about this amendment.
Of course, you just assume that I'm deranged.
20
posted on
03/03/2009 10:57:37 AM PST
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: cc2k
Why does McCain offer an Amendment that he knows will go down to defeat, is he grandstanding?
To: benjibrowder
Be darned if that makes any sense. McCaskill Yes, Bond no???
22
posted on
03/03/2009 11:01:07 AM PST
by
edge10
(Obama lied, babies died!)
To: cc2k
Collins, Snowe and Spectre must have thought it was Fri the 13th again.
23
posted on
03/03/2009 11:03:19 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: rabscuttle385
How DARE John McCain try to remove those 8500 earmarks! /soapbox
To: edge10
25
posted on
03/03/2009 11:06:18 AM PST
by
demsux
To: Abathar
That is surprising. Maybe Bayh saw some internals.
To: Abathar; 4rcane; musicman; txnativegop; BattleHymn; TomasUSMC; whatisthetruth
Abathar wrote:
| Bayh voted for i t?? My jaw just hit the space bar... |
|
Yes, he did.
I guess I should also have pointed out the Dems that should be praised on this one:
- Bayh (D-IN)
- McCaskill (D-MO)
Well, that was a short list. But if you live in these states, your
really need to send a "thank you for the correct vote on this important ammendment" note to these two. They need to know that their votes are noticed, and they need positive feedback when they vote for conservative principles like fiscal responsibility.
BTW, What's up in Missouri? That just doesn't look right at all. Bond on the wrong side, McCaskill on the correct side. Go figure.
4rcane wrote:
| All those Republicans listed needs to go. Theyre either too socialist, or too power hungry and playing politics. Either way, we dont want them around |
|
Maybe eventually.
Right now, they need to hear from their constituents at home that 1) we are watching and we know how you voted and 2) you shouldn't vote against the conservative principles of your constituents. Finally, all Republicans, plus the two Democrats that voted "yea" that they should not vote for cloture until a spending freeze is substituted for the pork and spending increases.
Everyone hit the phones and fax machines. Maybe this can be turned around.
You folks in Missouri will have to be careful to send the right message to the right Senator. It looks backwards from what it should be.
TomasUSMC wrote:
| So this amendment would have frozen spending at 2008 levels? |
|
Correct. This would have held FY 2009 spending to FY 2008 levels, through September 30, 2009.
whatisthetruth wrote:
| Why does McCain offer an Amendment that he knows will go down to defeat, is he grandstanding? |
|
Not exactly. If this amendment had gotten to 40 or 41 votes, it would have been big trouble for the Dems. They haven't voted for cloture on this yet. If 40+ Senators voted for a spending freeze, a filibuster to force that issue could result.
If this had gotten all Republicans plus Bayh and McCaskill, it would have had many more Dems cross over IMO. The Dem Leadership (especially the White House) wants to look forward to 2010. This 2009 Omnibus bill is a distraction. They want it to pass and go away. The Republicans have (had?) a real opportunity for this amendment to pass.
27
posted on
03/03/2009 11:07:35 AM PST
by
cc2k
(When less than half the voters pay taxes, it's called "taxation without representation.")
To: benjibrowder
And Bond voted against it. Hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys anymore.
To: cc2k
32 to 63. wow, really close...
Shows how far the politics of appeasement gets ya, eh?
29
posted on
03/03/2009 11:16:29 AM PST
by
vox_freedom
("If God be for us, who is against us?" -- Romans 8:31)
To: oneamericanvoice
No offense, but we’re fools if we trust anyone in power in Washington. If people in power could be trusted, the founding fathers wouldn’t have bothered with the restraints of the Constitution.
Think of Washington as being filled with Roman generals after the death of the reigning emperor - everybody making alliances, cutting deals, posturing and grandstanding, bluffing and backstabbing, looking out for (not you!) their own personal/clique’s/faction’s advancement and power. The Constitution’s main goal was to limit the damage done by these power-struggles.
30
posted on
03/03/2009 11:27:49 AM PST
by
LearsFool
("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
To: cc2k
Translation please. Waht was this about in plain English?
31
posted on
03/03/2009 11:30:09 AM PST
by
MindBender26
(The Hellfire Missile is one of the wonderful ways God shows us he loves American Soldiers & Marines)
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: cc2k
What is Shelby doing voting against this amendment?
33
posted on
03/03/2009 11:32:20 AM PST
by
hocndoc
(http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
To: cc2k
WTH is wrong with these Republicans?
Snowe, Collins, Specter. Big freakin’ surprise. NEWSFLASH: They are going to vote with the Rats on EVERYTHING—they are Rats. The Rats have a filibuster proof majority. We are so screwed.
34
posted on
03/03/2009 11:33:49 AM PST
by
KansasGirl
(Barry is a complete failure!)
To: cc2k
At first I was shocked by Senator Shelby’s vote.
Then I went to his website and looked up news releases:
http://shelby.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.NewsReleases
The good Senator, who happens to sit on the Senate Appropriations (A-Pork-Creations ??) Committee, is bringing home the aforementioned bacon.
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $502,679 for the University of Alabama at Birmingham
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $385,020 for Alabama Department of Public Health
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $695,272 for Jack Edwards Airport
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $26,125 for Taylor Volunteer Fire Department
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $64,600 to Rehobeth Fire Department
02/24/09
Shelby Announces $1.9 Million for Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport
02/23/09
Shelby Announces $193,365 for the University of South Alabama
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $373,535 for the University of Alabama
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $197,375 for Shelby County Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $205,928 for Russellville Municipal Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $48,693 for Guntersville Municipal Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $128,124 for Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $272,419 for Madison County Executive Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $80,154 for Wetumpka Municipal Airport
.
.
.
*** Rough calculation - around $5MM and this is just a partial list.
35
posted on
03/03/2009 11:48:39 AM PST
by
BlueNgold
(... Feed the tree!)
To: cc2k
Once again, McCain demonstrates his impotence and in doing so highlights the impotence and inconsequential state of the Republicans in both houses of Congress....
He KNEW there was no hope for this amendment.
He KNEW is would cast the GOP as the weak sister they have become...
Since there is NOTHING the GOP can accomplish in the Senate or the House without the APPROVAL of Obama and the new Thugocracy -— they should show their contempt for the contempt being heaped upon them and GO HOME...
STOP showing up...
STOP voting....
Deny the Thugocracy the “appearance” of being a Congress of the People and for the people.....
Don’t give the Thugs the ability of claiming Bipartisan support of their Kleptocracy....
36
posted on
03/03/2009 11:53:07 AM PST
by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: cc2k
We don’t have Republican anything to speak of.
37
posted on
03/03/2009 11:53:49 AM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: BlueNgold
Senate Appropriations (A-Pork-Creations ??) CommitteeAwesome neologism. I propose including it in the next update of the FReeper Glossary.
38
posted on
03/03/2009 11:54:05 AM PST
by
rfp1234
(Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
To: 1-Eagle; 131st Scout; 2CAVTrooper; 65superhawk; 6Covs; A.P.M.; adkinsjohnnie; Alabama Mutt; ...
Alabama:
Sessions (R-AL), Not Voting
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Wonder where Sessions was today.
And why’d Shelby vote NO?
Alabama ping!
39
posted on
03/03/2009 12:05:43 PM PST
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
To: Abathar
That was a real shocker for me too.
40
posted on
03/03/2009 12:11:22 PM PST
by
Rappini
("Pro deo et Patria.)
To: cc2k
What happened to all McCain’s “bipartisan buddies” that he has supported over the years??? /sarc
41
posted on
03/03/2009 12:11:35 PM PST
by
Primetimedonna
( It's SAN FRANCISCO, not Frisco. Charter member of the San Francisco Snowflakes)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
42
posted on
03/03/2009 12:13:41 PM PST
by
BlueNgold
(... Feed the tree!)
To: cc2k
I think it’s time to level Washington and start over, term limits for everyone, and a background check to check for socialistic tendencies.
43
posted on
03/03/2009 12:15:58 PM PST
by
pctech
To: BlueNgold
Of those appropriations you listed, I personally do not have a problem with the two that are going towards the fire departments.
The crap for the airports, and the schools is just that crap.
Wetumpka airport for example might see 2 maybe 3 planes come and go on a given day, they have no tower to speak of and yet they now have a terminal.
Providing funds so small volunteer fire departments can replace old equipment benefits everyone and lives up to the whole “provide for the general welfare of the United States” as cited in Section 8 unlike resurfacing runways and building terminals at airports that are used by less than 1% of the local population.
44
posted on
03/03/2009 12:27:18 PM PST
by
2CAVTrooper
(Today we've discovered a force more powerful than luck or genius----stupidity.)
To: Abathar
He’s running for re election....Tried to organize a group of senators into a “blue dog” type group before Christmas. Was the last to vote on the Porulus bill in hopes that his vote wasn’t needed....
OR....He’s heard we’re starting out “Bye Bye Bayh” campaign.
45
posted on
03/03/2009 12:29:58 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
To: cc2k
62 to 33?
Isn’t that about what McLame lost the election by?
46
posted on
03/03/2009 12:33:40 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: oneamericanvoice
Talk about derangement syndrome. You cant just disagree with someone over an issue and then give credit when due. The man tries to do something worthy, and all you can do is stike the same cord. When someone is always shaking your hand while stabbing you in the back, I guess you just say "thanks for the handshake... again.". I would say "hey, how about not sticking that knife in my back"... again. McCain would just say "my friend, lets find a bipartisan way to make handshaking illegal".
47
posted on
03/03/2009 12:34:13 PM PST
by
AvOrdVet
("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
To: LearsFool
No offense taken if none was meant.
Not everyone is untrustworthy in DC. I trust DeMint,Pence, Ensign, and a few others. But trusting doesn’t mean that we cede our engagement in the process. We are the overseers of our liberty. They are our employees regardless of which state they hail from.
What does the actual work of politics take? Have you ever considered it? Making alliances and cutting deals is the nature of business, relationships, friendships, and politics. It’s human nature. Not all of them are out for their own advancement and power. The Constitution limits damage because it acknowledges its existence.
48
posted on
03/03/2009 12:35:45 PM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: AvOrdVet
So do you agree that it would have been a good thing if spending were limited?
49
posted on
03/03/2009 12:36:53 PM PST
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
To: cc2k
Collins (R-ME), Snowe (R-ME), Specter (R-PA)
Surprised?
50
posted on
03/03/2009 12:39:01 PM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson