Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Amendment defeated in Senate 32-63
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00074 ^

Posted on 03/03/2009 10:27:47 AM PST by cc2k

McCain proposed this ammendment to H.R.1105:

From Page S2608 of the Congressional Record:

Mr. MCCAIN. Madam President, I
send an amendment to the desk and
ask for its immediate consideration.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
clerk will report the amendment.
The assistant legislative clerk read
as follows:
The Senator from Arizona [Mr. MCCAIN]
proposes an amendment numbered 592.
(Purpose: To continue funding at fiscal year
2008 levels through the end of fiscal year
2009)
Strike all after the enacting clause and
insert the following:
SECTION 1. CONTINUING 2008 FUNDING LEVELS.
Section 106(3) of Public Law 110–329 is
amended by striking ‘‘March 6, 2009’’ and inserting
‘‘September 30, 2009’’.
The vote was:
From http://www.senate.gov/...vote=00074:

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

Vote Summary

Question: On the Amendment (McCain Amdt. No. 592 )

Vote Number:

74

Vote Date:

March 3, 2009, 12:01 PM

Required For Majority:

1/2

Vote Result:

Amendment Rejected

Amendment Number:

S.Amdt. 592 to H.R. 1105 (Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009)

Statement of Purpose:

In the nature of a substitute.

Vote Counts:

YEAs

32

NAYs

63

Not Voting

4

Vote Summary

By Senator Name

By Vote Position

By Home State

Alphabetical by Senator Name

Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Nay
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Begich (D-AK), Nay
Bennet (D-CO), Nay
Bennett (R-UT), Nay
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Bond (R-MO), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Brown (D-OH), Nay
Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Bunning (R-KY), Yea
Burr (R-NC), Yea
Burris (D-IL), Nay
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
Cardin (D-MD), Nay
Carper (D-DE), Nay
Casey (D-PA), Nay
Chambliss (R-GA), Yea
Coburn (R-OK), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Not Voting
Corker (R-TN), Yea
Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
DeMint (R-SC), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Nay

Ensign (R-NV), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagan (D-NC), Nay
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Isakson (R-GA), Yea
Johanns (R-NE), Not Voting
Johnson (D-SD), Nay
Kaufman (D-DE), Nay
Kennedy (D-MA), Not Voting
Kerry (D-MA), Nay
Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
Kohl (D-WI), Nay
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (ID-CT), Nay
Lincoln (D-AR), Nay
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Martinez (R-FL), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea

McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
Merkley (D-OR), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Nelson (D-FL), Nay
Nelson (D-NE), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Risch (R-ID), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Sanders (I-VT), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Sessions (R-AL), Not Voting
Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Nay
Specter (R-PA), Nay
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Nay
Thune (R-SD), Yea
Udall (D-CO), Nay
Udall (D-NM), Nay
Vitter (R-LA), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (D-VA), Nay
Webb (D-VA), Nay
Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
Wicker (R-MS), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Nay

Vote Summary

By Senator Name

By Vote Position

By Home State

Grouped By Vote Position

YEAs ---32

Barrasso (R-WY)
Bayh (D-IN)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)

Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lugar (R-IN)

Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Wicker (R-MS)

NAYs ---63

Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Burris (D-IL)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)

Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaufman (D-DE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)

Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting - 4

Conrad (D-ND)
Johanns (R-NE)

Kennedy (D-MA)
Sessions (R-AL)

Vote Summary

By Senator Name

By Vote Position

By Home State

Grouped by Home State

Alabama:

Sessions (R-AL), Not Voting

Shelby (R-AL), Nay

Alaska:

Begich (D-AK), Nay

Murkowski (R-AK), Nay

Arizona:

Kyl (R-AZ), Yea

McCain (R-AZ), Yea

Arkansas:

Lincoln (D-AR), Nay

Pryor (D-AR), Nay

California:

Boxer (D-CA), Nay

Feinstein (D-CA), Nay

Colorado:

Bennet (D-CO), Nay

Udall (D-CO), Nay

Connecticut:

Dodd (D-CT), Nay

Lieberman (ID-CT), Nay

Delaware:

Carper (D-DE), Nay

Kaufman (D-DE), Nay

Florida:

Martinez (R-FL), Yea

Nelson (D-FL), Nay

Georgia:

Chambliss (R-GA), Yea

Isakson (R-GA), Yea

Hawaii:

Akaka (D-HI), Nay

Inouye (D-HI), Nay

Idaho:

Crapo (R-ID), Yea

Risch (R-ID), Yea

Illinois:

Burris (D-IL), Nay

Durbin (D-IL), Nay

Indiana:

Bayh (D-IN), Yea

Lugar (R-IN), Yea

Iowa:

Grassley (R-IA), Yea

Harkin (D-IA), Nay

Kansas:

Brownback (R-KS), Yea

Roberts (R-KS), Yea

Kentucky:

Bunning (R-KY), Yea

McConnell (R-KY), Yea

Louisiana:

Landrieu (D-LA), Nay

Vitter (R-LA), Yea

Maine:

Collins (R-ME), Nay

Snowe (R-ME), Nay

Maryland:

Cardin (D-MD), Nay

Mikulski (D-MD), Nay

Massachusetts:

Kennedy (D-MA), Not Voting

Kerry (D-MA), Nay

Michigan:

Levin (D-MI), Nay

Stabenow (D-MI), Nay

Minnesota:

Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay

Mississippi:

Cochran (R-MS), Nay

Wicker (R-MS), Yea

Missouri:

Bond (R-MO), Nay

McCaskill (D-MO), Yea

Montana:

Baucus (D-MT), Nay

Tester (D-MT), Nay

Nebraska:

Johanns (R-NE), Not Voting

Nelson (D-NE), Nay

Nevada:

Ensign (R-NV), Yea

Reid (D-NV), Nay

New Hampshire:

Gregg (R-NH), Yea

Shaheen (D-NH), Nay

New Jersey:

Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay

Menendez (D-NJ), Nay

New Mexico:

Bingaman (D-NM), Nay

Udall (D-NM), Nay

New York:

Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay

Schumer (D-NY), Nay

North Carolina:

Burr (R-NC), Yea

Hagan (D-NC), Nay

North Dakota:

Conrad (D-ND), Not Voting

Dorgan (D-ND), Nay

Ohio:

Brown (D-OH), Nay

Voinovich (R-OH), Yea

Oklahoma:

Coburn (R-OK), Yea

Inhofe (R-OK), Yea

Oregon:

Merkley (D-OR), Nay

Wyden (D-OR), Nay

Pennsylvania:

Casey (D-PA), Nay

Specter (R-PA), Nay

Rhode Island:

Reed (D-RI), Nay

Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay

South Carolina:

DeMint (R-SC), Yea

Graham (R-SC), Yea

South Dakota:

Johnson (D-SD), Nay

Thune (R-SD), Yea

Tennessee:

Alexander (R-TN), Nay

Corker (R-TN), Yea

Texas:

Cornyn (R-TX), Yea

Hutchison (R-TX), Yea

Utah:

Bennett (R-UT), Nay

Hatch (R-UT), Yea

Vermont:

Leahy (D-VT), Nay

Sanders (I-VT), Nay

Virginia:

Warner (D-VA), Nay

Webb (D-VA), Nay

Washington:

Cantwell (D-WA), Nay

Murray (D-WA), Nay

West Virginia:

Byrd (D-WV), Nay

Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay

Wisconsin:

Feingold (D-WI), Nay

Kohl (D-WI), Nay

Wyoming:

Barrasso (R-WY), Yea

Enzi (R-WY), Yea

Vote Summary

By Senator Name

By Vote Position

By Home State




TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Alaska; US: Maine; US: Mississippi; US: Missouri; US: Pennsylvania; US: Tennessee; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: fy2009; mccain; mcsame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last
If your Republican Senator voted against this, they need to hear from you. If you live in a state that went for McCain, but you have a Dem Senator that voted against this, they need to hear from you.

The Republicans that need to be scolded are:


1 posted on 03/03/2009 10:27:47 AM PST by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cc2k
IMO, Hatch and Bennett are using a tag-team approach to a lot of these issues. Hatch votes for one, then Bennett (especially on election years) that way they only take part of the grief for poor votes and can spin stuff by saying, "but I voted against the other bad bill".

I get the feeling from these guys that they are just playing a shell game.

2 posted on 03/03/2009 10:31:12 AM PST by batter (Wolverines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Politicians are such scumbags. I hope the Republicans who voted for this get hauled over the coals by the citizens of their states.


3 posted on 03/03/2009 10:34:48 AM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k
"The Republicans that need to be scolded are: "

Change SCOLDED to :" SEVERELY WATERBOARDED WITHIN AN INCH OF THIER SOON TO BE OVER RINO POLITICAL LIVES" , and I'm with ya.

4 posted on 03/03/2009 10:35:11 AM PST by musicman (Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batter

That’s the vast majority of Republican Party politics in a nutshell.

Why should they want smaller government? They’re IN government.


5 posted on 03/03/2009 10:35:14 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: batter

All those Republicans listed needs to go. They’re either too socialist, or too power hungry and playing politics. Either way, we don’t want them around


6 posted on 03/03/2009 10:36:56 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Specter, Collins and Snowe, bought and paid for. They are *owned* by the dems.


7 posted on 03/03/2009 10:37:31 AM PST by mojitojoe (None are more hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Alexander (R-TN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)

Not just scolded. KICKED OUT of the Republican party


8 posted on 03/03/2009 10:37:57 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

It isn’t difficult to imagine how each of these politcians would fare were they running their own businesses and actually INCREASED spending while business was in a downturn.


9 posted on 03/03/2009 10:40:55 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (The inmates are now officially running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Bond is worthless, since he is retiring after he finished his term. I am not surprised by his vote.


10 posted on 03/03/2009 10:41:27 AM PST by BattleHymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate; ChrisInAR; AvOrdVet; MaggieCarta; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; djsherin; ...

The Juan McCain Truth File.

"I have great respect for Al Gore."
—John McCain, October 2, 2008

FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  mccaintruthfile.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.)


Republican Commissar’s Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless GOP shills who simply want to meet a new overlord.

11 posted on 03/03/2009 10:41:52 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Bayh voted for i t??

My jaw just hit the space bar...


12 posted on 03/03/2009 10:42:12 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

So this amendment would have frozen spending at 2008 levels?


13 posted on 03/03/2009 10:44:30 AM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

So did McCaskill.


14 posted on 03/03/2009 10:48:54 AM PST by benjibrowder (Looking forward to kicking Obama out of office in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool
Why should they want smaller government? They’re IN government.

For life, usually.

15 posted on 03/03/2009 10:50:20 AM PST by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Talk about derangement syndrome. You can’t just disagree with someone over an issue and then give credit when due. The man tries to do something worthy, and all you can do is stike the same cord.

I disagree with him on the border/illegal immigration and a few more, but this was an action that he should be commended for, not condemned for.

When he said that he had great respect for Al Gore, did you bother to find out what type of respect? Did he respect him as a former VP? I don’t have any respect for Gore, but I respect the office. You should find out how things work.

Oh, and don’t bother sending any nasty you’re-not-a conservative/real-American nonsense. You’d be wrong on all of it.


16 posted on 03/03/2009 10:51:40 AM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Looks like it. Good for him for trying.


17 posted on 03/03/2009 10:52:24 AM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Perhaps this advice from Saturday Night Live will give the RINO the most basic education about how money works...
http://consumerist.com/consumer/clips/snl-skit-dont-buy-stuff-you-cant-afford-252491.php
In fact, it should be required for anyone applying for a mortgage! (Required by the bank, NOT the gubment.)


18 posted on 03/03/2009 10:53:05 AM PST by romborambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

The main purpose was to extend the extension of last year’s budget. This would allow time for debate over the new godzilla budget.

But NOOOOOOOO, we wouldn’t want to give the public time to see what’s hidden in the new budget.


19 posted on 03/03/2009 10:53:30 AM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice
Talk about derangement syndrome. You can’t just disagree with someone over an issue and then give credit when due. The man tries to do something worthy, and all you can do is stike the same cord.

I never said that I agreed or disagreed with McCain. The "post" you are referring to is the banner for the ping list. If any of the folks on the ping list have something to say about McCain's amendment, fine, whatever, but at least they know about this amendment.

Of course, you just assume that I'm deranged.

20 posted on 03/03/2009 10:57:37 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Why does McCain offer an Amendment that he knows will go down to defeat, is he grandstanding?


21 posted on 03/03/2009 10:57:54 AM PST by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

Be darned if that makes any sense. McCaskill Yes, Bond no???


22 posted on 03/03/2009 11:01:07 AM PST by edge10 (Obama lied, babies died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Collins, Snowe and Spectre must have thought it was Fri the 13th again.


23 posted on 03/03/2009 11:03:19 AM PST by Diogenesis (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

How DARE John McCain try to remove those 8500 earmarks! /soapbox


24 posted on 03/03/2009 11:05:21 AM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: edge10

Saw that too...wtf


25 posted on 03/03/2009 11:06:18 AM PST by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

That is surprising. Maybe Bayh saw some internals.


26 posted on 03/03/2009 11:07:32 AM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; 4rcane; musicman; txnativegop; BattleHymn; TomasUSMC; whatisthetruth
Abathar wrote:
Bayh voted for i t??

My jaw just hit the space bar...

Yes, he did.

I guess I should also have pointed out the Dems that should be praised on this one:

Well, that was a short list. But if you live in these states, your really need to send a "thank you for the correct vote on this important ammendment" note to these two. They need to know that their votes are noticed, and they need positive feedback when they vote for conservative principles like fiscal responsibility.

BTW, What's up in Missouri? That just doesn't look right at all. Bond on the wrong side, McCaskill on the correct side. Go figure.

4rcane wrote:
All those Republicans listed needs to go. They’re either too socialist, or too power hungry and playing politics. Either way, we don’t want them around
Maybe eventually.

Right now, they need to hear from their constituents at home that 1) we are watching and we know how you voted and 2) you shouldn't vote against the conservative principles of your constituents. Finally, all Republicans, plus the two Democrats that voted "yea" that they should not vote for cloture until a spending freeze is substituted for the pork and spending increases.

Everyone hit the phones and fax machines. Maybe this can be turned around.

You folks in Missouri will have to be careful to send the right message to the right Senator. It looks backwards from what it should be.

TomasUSMC wrote:
So this amendment would have frozen spending at 2008 levels?
Correct. This would have held FY 2009 spending to FY 2008 levels, through September 30, 2009.

whatisthetruth wrote:
Why does McCain offer an Amendment that he knows will go down to defeat, is he grandstanding?
Not exactly. If this amendment had gotten to 40 or 41 votes, it would have been big trouble for the Dems. They haven't voted for cloture on this yet. If 40+ Senators voted for a spending freeze, a filibuster to force that issue could result.

If this had gotten all Republicans plus Bayh and McCaskill, it would have had many more Dems cross over IMO. The Dem Leadership (especially the White House) wants to look forward to 2010. This 2009 Omnibus bill is a distraction. They want it to pass and go away. The Republicans have (had?) a real opportunity for this amendment to pass.

27 posted on 03/03/2009 11:07:35 AM PST by cc2k (When less than half the voters pay taxes, it's called "taxation without representation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

And Bond voted against it. Hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys anymore.


28 posted on 03/03/2009 11:13:55 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cc2k
32 to 63. wow, really close...
Shows how far the politics of appeasement gets ya, eh?
29 posted on 03/03/2009 11:16:29 AM PST by vox_freedom ("If God be for us, who is against us?" -- Romans 8:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice

No offense, but we’re fools if we trust anyone in power in Washington. If people in power could be trusted, the founding fathers wouldn’t have bothered with the restraints of the Constitution.

Think of Washington as being filled with Roman generals after the death of the reigning emperor - everybody making alliances, cutting deals, posturing and grandstanding, bluffing and backstabbing, looking out for (not you!) their own personal/clique’s/faction’s advancement and power. The Constitution’s main goal was to limit the damage done by these power-struggles.


30 posted on 03/03/2009 11:27:49 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Translation please. Waht was this about in plain English?


31 posted on 03/03/2009 11:30:09 AM PST by MindBender26 (The Hellfire Missile is one of the wonderful ways God shows us he loves American Soldiers & Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: cc2k

What is Shelby doing voting against this amendment?


33 posted on 03/03/2009 11:32:20 AM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

WTH is wrong with these Republicans?

Snowe, Collins, Specter. Big freakin’ surprise. NEWSFLASH: They are going to vote with the Rats on EVERYTHING—they are Rats. The Rats have a filibuster proof majority. We are so screwed.


34 posted on 03/03/2009 11:33:49 AM PST by KansasGirl (Barry is a complete failure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

At first I was shocked by Senator Shelby’s vote.
Then I went to his website and looked up news releases:
http://shelby.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.NewsReleases

The good Senator, who happens to sit on the Senate Appropriations (A-Pork-Creations ??) Committee, is bringing home the aforementioned bacon.
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $502,679 for the University of Alabama at Birmingham
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $385,020 for Alabama Department of Public Health
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $695,272 for Jack Edwards Airport
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $26,125 for Taylor Volunteer Fire Department
02/27/09
Shelby Announces $64,600 to Rehobeth Fire Department
02/24/09
Shelby Announces $1.9 Million for Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport
02/23/09
Shelby Announces $193,365 for the University of South Alabama
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $373,535 for the University of Alabama
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $197,375 for Shelby County Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $205,928 for Russellville Municipal Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $48,693 for Guntersville Municipal Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $128,124 for Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $272,419 for Madison County Executive Airport
02/20/09
Shelby Announces $80,154 for Wetumpka Municipal Airport
.
.
.
*** Rough calculation - around $5MM and this is just a partial list.


35 posted on 03/03/2009 11:48:39 AM PST by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Once again, McCain demonstrates his impotence and in doing so highlights the impotence and inconsequential state of the Republicans in both houses of Congress....

He KNEW there was no hope for this amendment.
He KNEW is would cast the GOP as the weak sister they have become...

Since there is NOTHING the GOP can accomplish in the Senate or the House without the APPROVAL of Obama and the new Thugocracy -— they should show their contempt for the contempt being heaped upon them and GO HOME...

STOP showing up...
STOP voting....
Deny the Thugocracy the “appearance” of being a Congress of the People and for the people.....
Don’t give the Thugs the ability of claiming Bipartisan support of their Kleptocracy....


36 posted on 03/03/2009 11:53:07 AM PST by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

We don’t have Republican anything to speak of.


37 posted on 03/03/2009 11:53:49 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
Senate Appropriations (A-Pork-Creations ??) Committee

Awesome neologism. I propose including it in the next update of the FReeper Glossary.

38 posted on 03/03/2009 11:54:05 AM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 1-Eagle; 131st Scout; 2CAVTrooper; 65superhawk; 6Covs; A.P.M.; adkinsjohnnie; Alabama Mutt; ...

Alabama:
Sessions (R-AL), Not Voting
Shelby (R-AL), Nay

Wonder where Sessions was today.

And why’d Shelby vote NO?

Alabama ping!


39 posted on 03/03/2009 12:05:43 PM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

That was a real shocker for me too.


40 posted on 03/03/2009 12:11:22 PM PST by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

What happened to all McCain’s “bipartisan buddies” that he has supported over the years??? /sarc


41 posted on 03/03/2009 12:11:35 PM PST by Primetimedonna ( It's SAN FRANCISCO, not Frisco. Charter member of the San Francisco Snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

See #35 above ...


42 posted on 03/03/2009 12:13:41 PM PST by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

I think it’s time to level Washington and start over, term limits for everyone, and a background check to check for socialistic tendencies.


43 posted on 03/03/2009 12:15:58 PM PST by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
Of those appropriations you listed, I personally do not have a problem with the two that are going towards the fire departments.

The crap for the airports, and the schools is just that crap.

Wetumpka airport for example might see 2 maybe 3 planes come and go on a given day, they have no tower to speak of and yet they now have a terminal.

Providing funds so small volunteer fire departments can replace old equipment benefits everyone and lives up to the whole “provide for the general welfare of the United States” as cited in Section 8 unlike resurfacing runways and building terminals at airports that are used by less than 1% of the local population.

44 posted on 03/03/2009 12:27:18 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Today we've discovered a force more powerful than luck or genius----stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

He’s running for re election....Tried to organize a group of senators into a “blue dog” type group before Christmas. Was the last to vote on the Porulus bill in hopes that his vote wasn’t needed....

OR....He’s heard we’re starting out “Bye Bye Bayh” campaign.


45 posted on 03/03/2009 12:29:58 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

62 to 33?
Isn’t that about what McLame lost the election by?


46 posted on 03/03/2009 12:33:40 PM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice
Talk about derangement syndrome. You can’t just disagree with someone over an issue and then give credit when due. The man tries to do something worthy, and all you can do is stike the same cord.

When someone is always shaking your hand while stabbing you in the back, I guess you just say "thanks for the handshake... again.". I would say "hey, how about not sticking that knife in my back"... again. McCain would just say "my friend, lets find a bipartisan way to make handshaking illegal".

47 posted on 03/03/2009 12:34:13 PM PST by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

No offense taken if none was meant.

Not everyone is untrustworthy in DC. I trust DeMint,Pence, Ensign, and a few others. But trusting doesn’t mean that we cede our engagement in the process. We are the overseers of our liberty. They are our employees regardless of which state they hail from.

What does the actual work of politics take? Have you ever considered it? Making alliances and cutting deals is the nature of business, relationships, friendships, and politics. It’s human nature. Not all of them are out for their own advancement and power. The Constitution limits damage because it acknowledges its existence.


48 posted on 03/03/2009 12:35:45 PM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

So do you agree that it would have been a good thing if spending were limited?


49 posted on 03/03/2009 12:36:53 PM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cc2k
Collins (R-ME), Snowe (R-ME), Specter (R-PA)

Surprised?
50 posted on 03/03/2009 12:39:01 PM PST by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson