Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case
WND ^ | 3-10-09 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/10/2009 6:35:13 PM PDT by hope

A lawyer lobbying the U.S. Justice Department and the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of Barack Obama's qualifications to be president says a key conservative justice has hinted that another conservative justice has been voting against hearing the dispute. According to Orly Taitz, a California attorney working through her Defend Our Freedoms Foundation on several cases challenging Obama, said she was presented with an opportunity to ask a question of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia yesterday. The issue of Obama's eligibility has been raised before the Supreme Court at least four times already but has yet to be given a single hearing. Cases have been brought by Taitz, Philip Berg, Cort Wrotnowski and Leo Donofrio.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barackobama; berg; bho2008; bho2009; bho44; birthcertificate; british; certifigate; citizen; citizenship; colb; constitution; corruption; coverup; democrats; democratscandals; donofrio; eligibility; hawaii; impeachobama; ineligible; kennedy; kenya; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; orly; orlytaitz; scalia; scotus; taitz; wrotnowski
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: JustaDumbBlonde
"I don't believe Taitz if what WND says is true, and I am always suspicious of WND material."

That makes three of us, you me and Rush. FReepers need to stop following these conspiracy believing nuts who only serve to drag conservatives down with this foolishness. Seriously if one buys into Berg, WND and their conspiratorial lot, choices must be made. You either buy into their theory that Bush and Cheney caused 911 and should be prosecuted for it or you dismiss them for the loons their 911 theories represent. Come on FReepers, there is a reason Rush, Karl Rove, Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal, Mitt Romney and any serious minded conservative are not jumping on the Berg conspiracy crazy train. Wake up. You are being used--EFFECTIVELY!

61 posted on 03/10/2009 8:40:39 PM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I agree. It’s Roberts.

I’m sure he understands that the best thing for our country and the conservative movement is for Obama to fail.


62 posted on 03/10/2009 8:40:43 PM PDT by proudpapa (Obama - The Worst One Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

Hannity brought it up? I’ll just have to catch his show on the second showing.


63 posted on 03/10/2009 8:42:49 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I was just quoting someone upthread: didn’t see it, but I’m rather surprised he did.

Biden’s ‘manufactured crisis’ comment meant something... what?


64 posted on 03/10/2009 8:49:33 PM PDT by txhurl (ralph...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WheresMyBailout
I’m not comfortable with being “hazed” into a forum just because I’m a “newbie”.

Don't think of it as being "hazed".

Think of it as friendly fire.

Welcome to FR.

65 posted on 03/10/2009 8:50:30 PM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WheresMyBailout; MHGinTN
Bwahahahaha ... nice comeback, n00b!
Which elicits...
I’m not taking the bait, troll.
WMB knows what a "troll" is. Yet...
I didn’t know what “n00b” meant.

What?! I'm not meaning to butt into things here, but I find WMB's...argument...to be deceptive.
Calling somebody a "troll", as well as other wording used, is indicative of somebody with a moderate to fair understanding of Internet vernacular. (...feel free to PM me...)
And if the newbie was concerned that he had been slighted all he had to do was look up "n00b" on any search engine.
The same thing goes for Tango Sierra.

It just doesn't add up. Is it new math?
Pardon my analyzing ways.

66 posted on 03/10/2009 8:56:56 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd
Come on FReepers, there is a reason...
Well? What is the reason?
67 posted on 03/10/2009 8:59:01 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WheresMyBailout

Occasionally, someone will post the freeper lexicon. It’s a huge post, that will normally get bumped to several hundred posts whenever a new thread of it starts. I can’t seem to find it with searches. Perhaps someone else here might have a reference for you. It’s a great read and really goes into all the acronyms and weirdness that permeates FR.


68 posted on 03/10/2009 9:12:49 PM PDT by zeugma (Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: WheresMyBailout

I’ve been called a baby killer on these forums. Don’t sweat it.


69 posted on 03/10/2009 9:21:53 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Obama - Making Jimmy Carter look like a giant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WheresMyBailout

Regardless of how long you’ve been a member, based upon your posts to me, it’s clear you’re a troll and I will ignore your babble from here forward.


70 posted on 03/10/2009 9:22:21 PM PDT by dennisw (0bomo the subprime president- ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
"What is the reason?"

Strategy, and to be more specific, a losing strategy. This whole conspiratorial strategy of joining forces with a movement that believes 911 was a Bush controlled inside job is an embarrassingly losing strategy for conservatives. To the American public it represents a position that we know we can't compete in the arena of ideas. So instead we'll promote conspiratorial theories that neither Clinton nor any of our Republican candidates raised during the presidential campaign to justify our lunacy. If questioned on our lunacy we'll then cite the credentials of our fellow conspirators who to this day, still want to prosecute Bush and Cheney for causing the 911 attacks. The Dems can't afford the free marketing these right-wing conspiracy nuts are freely contributing to their party.

71 posted on 03/10/2009 9:23:15 PM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
saying you need a fourth justice and saying you need four justices are two differnt statements.

That's right. And Scalia said that four were needed. Not "a fourth".

72 posted on 03/10/2009 9:38:02 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Scalia stated ‘need to get a fourth’

No he didn't. Reread the article.

73 posted on 03/10/2009 9:39:38 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: appeal2
My guess is you know Bambi will be leaving the WH when Biden has a sudden relapse and has to leave the VP because of health reasons. The only dim out there who has the slightest credibility is perhaps Bayh. He will be installed and Bambi will be out in 60 days thereafter. I have no way of knowing this other than my gut.

Were you the one predicting a Nixon/Agnew/Ford scenario on another thread? The poster mentioned "Maryland."

Bambi doesn’t like the job. He is lazy, incompetent, a total narcissist who will not be happy when 90 percent of the population hates him. 57 percent on PMSNBC are already rating him an F. He is going to freak and will be forced from office by the shadowdy hand that really runs things.

Presidents who took this office previously buckled down and got to work immediately. (Yes, even Carter.) No fanfare, no parties, just a rolling up of the sleeves. BO wanted to get away after only two weeks. Now it's going on two months and he's too "tired" to lay proper diplomatic groundwork with our allies. I can't see him growing into the job, because that would mean he'd have to grow up, and I don't think he's an adult at all.

The only thing standing in their way is Biden. He is unfit to lead or wash the White House toilets, a complete and total bufoon that makes Bambi look like a natural born leader. Bambi will be out by November of 2009.

You seem so certain of this.

74 posted on 03/10/2009 9:40:42 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hope

mark


75 posted on 03/10/2009 10:21:10 PM PDT by KarenMarie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: refermech
Considering Powell's turncoat behavior, similar behavior in a SCOTUS Justice would not surprise me.

Some things are thicker than water...

76 posted on 03/10/2009 10:28:05 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: appeal2
Biden succeeds Barry-O and picks Her Thighness as VP. Biden then suffers another aneurysm and HRC becomes POTUS and rules for over 10 years.

How's that for your WORST F**KING NIGHTMARE?

77 posted on 03/11/2009 1:48:38 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hope

BTTT


78 posted on 03/11/2009 5:17:05 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd
This whole conspiratorial strategy of joining forces with a movement that believes 911 was a Bush controlled inside job is an embarrassingly losing strategy for conservatives.
Are you trying to imply that just because Berg, as a "Truther", has brought a birth certificate/eligibility suit that forces are being joined? Good luck with that.
I do, however, see a bunch of folks trying to persuade others that such a thing is true, even to the point of nicknaming people who want to see original documents as Birthers. (comparable to the nickname Truthers)

To the American public it represents a position that we know we can't compete in the arena of ideas.
How do you know this? The majority of the American public isn't even aware that people are demanding to see the original documents because, as you stated, many conservative pundits aren't even covering the issue.

So instead we'll promote conspiratorial theories that neither Clinton nor any of our Republican candidates raised during the presidential campaign to justify our lunacy.
No politician had to. Others did it. It was the New York Times that started the McCain issue...
McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out
And National Review started the Obama issue...
Obama Could Debunk Some Rumors By Releasing His Birth Certificate.
No conspiracy there, is there? It was looked into and resolved. The same can't be said for Obama.

If questioned on our lunacy we'll then cite the credentials of our fellow conspirators who to this day, still want to prosecute Bush and Cheney for causing the 911 attacks.
Ah, well, it's already been shown that you're attempting to establish guilt by association. A new sentence isn't going to help.

Blackbird...from the White Album.

79 posted on 03/11/2009 5:20:55 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
"Ah, well, it's already been shown that you're attempting to establish guilt by association. A new sentence isn't going to help."

I'm not trying to hide it. If you associate with folks who believe Bush and Cheney were responsible for the 911 attacks you are in fact a LOON!

80 posted on 03/11/2009 7:06:48 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson