Birther bill hits Congress

Thanks for the ping, lj. Here are some of my thoughts.

a surreptitious agenda, which one can infer is nationalist socialism.
***Yup. That’s why I called Obama a National Socialist back in October.

Obama is a National Socialist
www.freerepublic.com ^ | October 27, 2008 | Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2116981/posts
10/27/2008 5:19:47 PM PDT · by Kevmo · 18 replies ·1,123+ views

Thus we have so many Obama operatives now posting on the issue here on FR, to subvert that effort and marginalize it. Their presence has been welcomed, because in the final analysis, the inquiring minds of FR always win such issues. Jim Robinson knew this, and that is why he has allowed their presence, welcomed it,which was a very intelligent move on his part.
***I disagree here, that it was intelligent to allow such operatives to subvert the effort. Jesus said that a house divided cannot stand. And He was right.

And so now, tens of thousands witness on Free Republic their solipsist effort,
***What does that mean?

Ooops!My Bad. Should be Solopsist not Solipsist, Solopsism: (example) The concept of egocentrism is fully compatible with Solopsism even though you feel that it's not. The reason for this is simple, I imagined Egocentrism, and therefor it exists. Logically it follows that anybody may hold egocentric views as they please. Some of you people who only exist in my head may say that maybe I suffer from a severe form of egocentrism. This is, of course, such a silly notion because the concept of egocentrism only holds true if the number of possible entities capable of egocentric thought is bigger then 1. Since the only entity that exists is me egocentrism can not really exist and because I am the only single existing consciousness this number is precisely 1 and I can't possibly be an egocentrist. In fact, I find it perfectly alright and normal for you , who only exists in my imagination, to think that you are the most important person in the world ( for example ). Since I am remarkably modest and well-mannered I would not even start thinking about considering arguing with you about your divine like status as such. The whole explanation for this is of course that you could possibly be the most important person that exists only in my imagination and you would, therefore, be totally correct in assuming you are that important. In that case I can only state that I am very very glad that I am not the most important entity in my imagination. Imagine the burden of being the most important entity combined with being the only existing entity. It can't be done ! http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Solopsism Every Obabot I have encountered treats Freepers thus.A mark of the new Obama Nationalist Socialism. They identify themselves without knowing.

I share your views on Obama;s fascism, and both Freeper Fred Nerks and I predate you in that conclusion, we were yelling it from the battlements since March of 2008.

Of course reading Jonah Goldbergs "Liberal Fascism" helped, as well as analyzing Obamas work in Kenya 2006/2007, where his nationalist socialist neo-colonial Chicago Black Power politics were on display for all to see, resulting in intertribal genocide in the streets of Nairobi and elsewhere in Kenya's Rift Valley.

I do not believe that Obabots divided us, they united us, and made us not give up.

The Dems had a hearing, did some stuff. I don’t think any laws were passed???

from the link:

A group of lawmakers made an unsuccessful effort four years ago to eliminate any lingering doubts about the meaning of the provision through legislation that would have said children born outside the country to American citizens are eligible for the presidency.

McCaskill said that her legislation should be noncontroversial and that Congress should move rapidly to clear up any ambiguity. She acknowledged there could be some who believe the only route to resolve the confusion is through a Constitutional amendment.

“We can at least make a legislative declaration that the definition of ‘natural born’ includes children of the active military,” she said. “This should be done quickly and easily.”

That’s where we differ, Kansas. It is equally rational to assume that allegiance-in-birth and jurisdiction-in-birth combined define “natural born”. And there is historic precedent documented sufficient not only to support this position but to deem it as *declaratory*, a legal term, in my mind and in numerous others. That is why it is imperative that the legislature and court systems not shirk their responsibility yet again in this matter. What was common sense in the days of Washington is no longer the case today. We can at least agree that the “birther bill” is a much needed step in the right direction. Yes?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.