Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York, NY - State Bureaucrats Fight Doctor's $79 Flat Fee for Uninsured
http://www.vosizneias.com/28392/2009/03/04/new-york-ny-doctor-trying-to-help-uninsured-patients-with ^ | 3/22/09 | anon

Posted on 03/21/2009 11:43:25 PM PDT by genghis

New York, NY - The state is trying to shut down a New York City doctor's ambitious plan to treat uninsured patients for around $1,000 a year.

Dr. John Muney offers his patients everything from mammograms to mole removal at his AMG Medical Group clinics, which operate in all five boroughs.

"I'm trying to help uninsured people here," he said.

His patients agree to pay $79 a month for a year in return for unlimited office visits with a $10 co-pay.

But his plan landed him in the crosshairs of the state Insurance Department, which ordered him to drop his fixed-rate plan - which it claims is equivalent to an insurance policy.

Muney insists it is not insurance because it doesn't cover anything that he can't do in his offices, like complicated surgery. He points out his offices do not operate 24/7 so they can't function like emergency rooms.

"I'm not doing an insurance business," he said. "I'm just providing my services at my place during certain hours."

He says he can afford to charge such a small amount because he doesn't have to process mountains of paperwork and spend hours on billing.

"If they leave me alone, I can serve thousands of patients," he said.

The state believes his plan runs afoul of the law because it promises to cover unplanned procedures - like treating a sudden ear infection - under a fixed rate. That's something only a licensed insurance company can do.

"The law is strict on how insurance is defined," said an Insurance Department spokesman.

A possible solution that Muney's lawyer crafted would force patients to pay more than $10 for unplanned procedures.

They are waiting to see if the state will accept the compromise. Still, Muney is unhappy because, he said, "I really don't want to charge more. They're forcing me."

One of his patients, Matthew Robinson, 52, was furious to learn the state was interfering with the plan.

"The whole point is, he [Muney] found a way of paying his rent, paying his workers, and getting to see patients for the price," said Robinson.

"How can the state dictate you've got to charge more?"


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: flatfeedoctor; regulation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
Stop him before he saves someone's life. Regulators as usual, not behaving in the public's interest.
1 posted on 03/21/2009 11:43:26 PM PDT by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: genghis

Exactly - they realize that such a plan would destroy their power and then the bureaucrats would be out of a job.


2 posted on 03/21/2009 11:44:43 PM PDT by ikka (Brother, you asked for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

And such regulators are interfering with the free market and a businessman’s ability to set his own fees. This is exactly the kind of price competition American medicine needs desperately. How the hell did we get to this place in America?


3 posted on 03/21/2009 11:47:24 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Free California from public employee union rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis
Government bureaucrats hate the free market and innovation. Especially if it provides uninsured people like yours truly with affordable health care. They have to intervene to put a stop to it!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 03/21/2009 11:47:40 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Here is a man that is honestly trying to help and has a wonderful idea; and who else; but our crooked government doesn’t like it.


5 posted on 03/21/2009 11:50:42 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka

I would love that.


6 posted on 03/21/2009 11:51:17 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: genghis

He’s right. This isn’t insurance. Not even close.

Government officials are becoming more unhinged by the minute. Obama Effect for sure.


7 posted on 03/21/2009 11:51:56 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
What's funny is they want him to charge his patients MORE! Doesn't that defeat the entire purpose of making health care affordable to more people by lowering the cost of it? Only the government could see something amiss with good old fashioned common sense. I haven't seen a patient complain about the doctor's fixed rate plan!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

8 posted on 03/21/2009 11:52:39 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: genghis

If they’re that worried about illegal insurance rackets, they should go after Big Mike, who offers pizzeria owners a great deal on fire insurance. A thousand a month guarantees that their businesses won’t burn down.


9 posted on 03/21/2009 11:54:40 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (What's Black and White and Red all over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

“That’s something only a licensed insurance company can do.”

Name one insurance company worker that ever graduated medical school.


10 posted on 03/21/2009 11:54:59 PM PDT by NoLibZone (To save our nation a Strongly Worded e-mail may be in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis
...runs afoul of the law because it promises to cover unplanned procedures - like treating a sudden ear infection - under a fixed rate. That's something only a licensed insurance company can do...

Why is there a law that prevents this doctor from doing this? Who is it designed to protect? The doctors? Patients? Or the insurance companies?

11 posted on 03/21/2009 11:56:15 PM PDT by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
You mean the state is protecting the insurance company monopoly? No wonder they can't allow a precedent to be set. It might give people dangerous ideas and then the entire system will come tumbling down!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

12 posted on 03/21/2009 11:58:05 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: genghis
A classic example of government, once again, blocking the benefit of it's citizenry. I saw an interesting quote yesterday...

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson

13 posted on 03/21/2009 11:58:30 PM PDT by highlander_UW (The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Hero doctor versus sub-human democrat party power mad cockroachs.


14 posted on 03/21/2009 11:59:57 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
The insurance companies, I bet. The law wasn't written to protect doctors or the interests of patients. That's why health care costs are so high. No one has an incentive to seek good quality care at the lowest possible price because an insurance company pays the entire bill.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

15 posted on 03/22/2009 12:00:47 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Boy those are dumb bureaucrats. An insurance company is regulated because it promises to late pay for something for you that it does not have. This MD in fact is an MD, so he certainly can provide care.

It is the MD’s business how he prices his services. He can in fact deliver these services. Thus he is not insuring patients, he is merely selling his services using a two part pricing scheme.


16 posted on 03/22/2009 12:12:01 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis; John Semmens

Are you sure this wasn’t written by John Semmens....


17 posted on 03/22/2009 12:18:43 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS
I'd love to see the law that forbids him from setting pricing for his own services and making his own payment arrangements with his patients for those services rendered. Who is harmed here? Certainly not the State Of New York!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

18 posted on 03/22/2009 12:20:08 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: genghis
The government has gotten too big for their own good.. The longer they go unwatched, the further they put their finger into every aspect of a civilian's life they can. There is no stopping it

bookmark.
19 posted on 03/22/2009 12:20:56 AM PDT by aetheraddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Right and again the key difference is an insurance company is not offering medical services, it is promising to pay for your use of them. This MD is in fact promising to deliver these services. That is what makes it not insurance.


20 posted on 03/22/2009 12:28:39 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: genghis

$75 is the price to visit the doctor in the “After Hours Surgery” here in New Zealand — with insurance 80% if that can be reimbursed, subject to policy maximums.

(”Surgery” has a slightly different meaning here in NZ to what it means in the US. As well as being the process whereby a doctor cuts up a patient, a “surgery” is also another name for the doctor’s office)

Regular price (business hours) is about $45. With insurance 80% of that is reimbursed, subject to policy maximums.

So $79 for a NY doctor isn’t too bad, by New Zealand standards.

(A Big Mac costs NZ$4.95 here, by way of comparison)


21 posted on 03/22/2009 12:40:01 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Thanks!

I was looking for this article earlier this afternoon.


22 posted on 03/22/2009 12:40:52 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis
"The law is strict on how insurance is defined," said an Insurance Department spokesman. The legislators wrote the laws just as the Mob told them to.
23 posted on 03/22/2009 12:42:28 AM PDT by rvoitier (O.B.A.M.A. - One Big-Ass Mistake, America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
insurance company pays the entire bill

Not if it's up to them and they can get away with it. That is if they didn't get pre-authorization (dumbest thing I have ever heard of from insurance people who aren't anywhere close to being doctors).

Oh, and let's not forget all the paperwork for the government (Medicare/Medicaid) who can withhold payment for any reason until they decide to pay you! If they can't find a real reason they will make up one.

24 posted on 03/22/2009 12:46:12 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JLS

But he’s bypassing the insurance companies, and that chain of money up to and including kickbacks to politicians. How could they possibly let his scheme of not including payoffs stand?


25 posted on 03/22/2009 12:46:49 AM PDT by kenth (Obama - One Big Ass Mistake, America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: genghis

the state sees money running through its fingers. Rather than Dr. Muney submitting claims to Medicare, he collects cash. Rather than paying the state insurance licensing fees, he shuns insurance, enabling his patients to pay cash. The government worries that if all doctors did this, the government would not be able to continue employing people to process insurance, doctors could cut overhead by laying off insurance billers and accounts receivable employees.

Update:

The State wrote to the doctor and said he could continue to offer his fixed fee $79/month medical care for preventative health but if someone came in complaining of an illness or injury, he would have to charge them at least $33 for that visit. Bureaucracy at work.

http://blog.americanjusticecenter.com/2009/03/state-orders-dr-john-muney-to-stop.html


26 posted on 03/22/2009 12:53:26 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Insurance Industry Wins, Low-Cost Doctor Raises Fees

Muney, a former surgeon, started offering the $79-a-month plan in 2008.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,508990,00.html


27 posted on 03/22/2009 12:55:36 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Want laser surgery to correct your vision?

It’s not covered by insurance.

When it first began, it cost a few thousand dollars.

Now, with competition, it’s down to a few hundred dollars.

That’s downright American.


28 posted on 03/22/2009 1:01:51 AM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis
The good doc should put up a sign outside his office:

Gov't and Insurance people ..
The barber shop is down the street.

29 posted on 03/22/2009 1:02:44 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
You can't have people pay $10 for an office visit. It would be the end of the world! So the bureaucrats forced him to raise the fee to make them happy. Consumers lost due to their interference.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

30 posted on 03/22/2009 1:20:55 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: genghis
The state believes his plan runs afoul of the law because it promises to cover unplanned procedures - like treating a sudden ear infection - under a fixed rate. That's something only a licensed insurance company can do.

What a crock. The guy offers medical service like a gym membership and the state freaks out.

31 posted on 03/22/2009 1:25:33 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
That's from the same people who holler about the high cost of health insurance and then stop in to thwart a plan that actually addresses it! Hypocrisy, thy name is....

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

32 posted on 03/22/2009 1:36:43 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: genghis

The government’s position is simple: No one should be permitted to offer a viable alternative to socialized medicine.


33 posted on 03/22/2009 3:01:57 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis
Just wait’ll 0bama’s minions get wind of this. Affordable private health care? He'll be getting the Joe the Plumber colonoscopy treatment free any day now.
34 posted on 03/22/2009 3:17:36 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The death cult wants death, the Israelis want peace. I, for one, see only one solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

Medicare says you can’t charge anyone less than you charge Medicare.

Of course, that’s a fiction, because many insurance co’s pay doctors on a percentage of Medicare. I hear that in some areas with a lot of competition among doctors and large groups of doctors, Family Physicians are offered 90% of Medicare.

There’s also the anti-trust laws that prohibit doctors from sharing information about charges and payment. We’re advised that we had better keep even private conversations and on-line discussions, etc., very general or we will be charged under the anti-trust. Also, a large group of doctors can’t be responsible for more than some set percentage of an area’s population -— while there is no such law against the insurance co’s.

Clinton’s administration charge and prosecuted a group of physicians and some hospital officials under these laws in Florida in 96 or 97 because they were advertising rates less than Medicare. The offer was considered unfair collusion. Some of the doctors went to jail, but the officials just paid fines.

Oh, for the good old days when Reno and Freeh held rallies in football stadiums to teach Medicare patients how to turn in their doctors for “fraudandabuse.” These words were melded under Reno. This was code for “We can get triple damages from the courts and pay for our department.” That was around the time that the Office of the Inspector General and the FBI made armed raids on hospitals and doctors’ offices because of alleged “fraudandabuse.”


35 posted on 03/22/2009 3:19:08 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Update:

The State wrote to the doctor and said he could continue to offer his fixed fee $79/month medical care for preventative health but if someone came in complaining of an illness or injury, he would have to charge them at least $33 for that visit. Bureaucracy at work.

The doctor should draft a one-page summary of his experiences with NY state government, which explains how he was forced to raise his visit fee to $33. Then every patient should be given a copy. Let them see the real effects of government up close.

36 posted on 03/22/2009 3:32:37 AM PDT by floozy22 (El Presidente: "Ten pounds of sh*t in a five pound bag.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: floozy22

I know of 2 doctors in Scottsdale who have small private family practices and still DO HOUSE CALLS!


37 posted on 03/22/2009 4:26:53 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: genghis
Shhh, don't tell anyone in the government of New York, but Netflix has a plan where you can have up to 3 movies of theirs at a time for $13.99 a month. That would sound like a movie insurance plan to the State of New York.
38 posted on 03/22/2009 4:52:17 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

I have the best medical care in my life - for $45 a visit.

This guy teaches other Drs how to set up a practice like his.

He files no insurance. If you have private insurance, you can file.

Send this to your Dr.

http://www.aafp.org/fpm/20070600/19brea.html


39 posted on 03/22/2009 5:07:14 AM PDT by gartrell bibberts (Good border security = high priced tomatoes. OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy
Actually, it is very close to insurance. It can be said to really be insurance.

Insurance is the monetization of risk. Risk is the chance of loss when such chance is probabilistic. So charging a flat annual fee (in monthly installments) to cover, among other things, fortuitous accidents is, in essence, insurance.

What if the doctor were, in reality, running an intentional or unintentional Ponzi scheme by charging less than it cost to provide services? Very quickly he would run out of money and go bankrupt. This would leave patients in the hole to the extent of their prepaid premiums. And by relying on the good Doctor, they would have no other insurance. This is why insurance is regulated.

But I do believe that the State has put formalism ahead of logic. The fact that payments are monthly (I assume) removes the most serious consequences of inadequate pricing. It is an insurance-like service that is being provided. But it does not trigger in a serious way the concerns insurance regulation is intended to deal with.

40 posted on 03/22/2009 5:49:20 AM PDT by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: genghis

This sounds exactly like a retainer.

Does that mean that lawyers are charging for legal insurance?


41 posted on 03/22/2009 5:53:27 AM PDT by chrisser (The Two Americas: Those that want to be coddled, Those that want to be left the hell alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Somebody needs to get this Doc an award for free market capitalism..and common sense. His critics need an enema.


42 posted on 03/22/2009 5:56:28 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
The difference: when billings exceed the retainer, you get charged the difference. This is exactly the issue raised by the doctor's service. If he gets more than the expected number of accidents or illnesses, he will go broke. And his patients will be left high and dry.
43 posted on 03/22/2009 6:00:10 AM PDT by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
The doctor is not being an insurance agency, he's being a one-man, limited-coverage HMO.

The insurance companies and bureaucrats can't afford to have this catch on. Otherwise the next step would be comprehensive group practices doing the same thing. The step after that would be for people to only have catastrophic hospitalization insurance, plus a yearly plan with their local doctor/group.

44 posted on 03/22/2009 6:01:05 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

which will do away with any need for a national health care system


45 posted on 03/22/2009 6:02:57 AM PDT by Gone_Postal ("Men who say it cannot be done, should not interupt those doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
Why is there a law that prevents this doctor from doing this?

Who is John Galt?
46 posted on 03/22/2009 6:06:40 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
If he gets more than the expected number of accidents or illnesses, he will go broke. And his patients will be left high and dry.

Or he will have to change his rates, or not retain patients with chronic conditions (For this to work, the doc has to have the option of not renewing a patient who has a chronic condition at the end of the year).

For other patients, it is reasonable to assume that illnesses and accidents will be fairly evenly distributed over the year, and that this month's payments can be used to cover this month's expenses.

47 posted on 03/22/2009 6:19:45 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy
Government officials are becoming more unhinged by the tminute.

Key observation.

It is because There's few limits to their authority. The presumption of enumerated powers of government is pretty much gone. Many officials, from the local queen bee at the town hall to the State and Federal bureacracies, feel that if they say it, its the law unless some other more influential politician or agency says otherwise. If you don't like it, tough... go to court and fight government paid drone lawyers... with the high costs and lengthy delays. Good luck in anything but the clearest cases, because of the politicization of the courts, too. And, for the official... the consequences of a reversed decision are minimal.

48 posted on 03/22/2009 6:23:39 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

You have described an actuarial (insurance math) solution. I think NY State is being foolish. But it is an insurance-type product.


49 posted on 03/22/2009 6:28:19 AM PDT by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: genghis
"How can the state dictate you've got to charge more?"

Easy, the state is a dictatorship and can do whatever it wants. We gave them that power one slice at a time over the last 200 years. Maybe it's time to take it back.....

50 posted on 03/22/2009 8:29:09 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson