Posted on 03/29/2009 6:32:33 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Thank God only science is taught in science class.
==Thank God only science is taught in science class.
I’m not sure what science class you are referring to. If a science class teaches goo-to-you evolution, they are teaching historical inference and conjecture, not science.
Your problem seems to be with evolution, a theory that is supported by observation and evidence. Furthermore, as a theory derived by a scientific method, it is falsifiable. If you can collect, verify, and present real evidence to the contrary, it will be discarded. Can you say the same about creationism?
Evolution and Christianity are perfectly compatible. Thank God creationism is not taught as science (except, perhaps, in certain private or home school environments where recess includes such activities as kickball and snake handling).
==Your problem seems to be with evolution, a theory that is supported by observation and evidence.
When it comes to origins, even if you start with the first proto-cell, all the evos have is conjecture and inference. And that’s all they can have, because they are dealing with the UNOBSERVABLE, UNREPEATABLE past. Surely you can grasp the obvious????
“When it comes to origins, even if you start with the first proto-cell, all the evos have is conjecture and inference. And thats all they can have, because they are dealing with the UNOBSERVABLE, UNREPEATABLE past. “
The past is not repeatable, but the evidence of past events remains. That evidence conclusively supports evolution. There is no comparable body of evidence that supports any other method.
Evolution and Christianity are perfectly compatible.
==The past is not repeatable, but the evidence of past events remains. That evidence conclusively supports evolution. There is no comparable body of evidence that supports any other method.
If you’re up to the challenge, I would be glad to rigorously debate you on any subject relating to origins. Indeed, you can even pick where we start. Are you game?
==Evolution and Christianity are perfectly compatible.
The Bible is specifically campatible with biblical creation. Whereas, there is no mention at all of evolution anywhere to be found in the Bible, and plenty of verses that specifically contradict Darwood’s materialist creation myth.
Of course, but I don’t see the point. You don’t seem to understand the fundamentals of the scientific method.
“==Evolution and Christianity are perfectly compatible.
The Bible is specifically campatible with biblical creation. Whereas, there is no mention at all of evolution anywhere to be found in the Bible, and plenty of verses that specifically contradict Darwoods materialist creation myth.”
I said that evolution was perfectly compatible with Christianity, not with a literal reading of the bible.
OK, pick your poisen, where would you like to start?
If you have a point, make it and I’ll respond.
Ouch.
Well done!
I will, I will! Our subject: information theory and evolution.
Starting place: creationist contention that evolution is impossible since mutations never add new "information" to the gene pool.
Sorry old man, one person at a time. But if you like, I will be glad to debate you on the subject (including your inexact understanding of the creationist position contained in your “starting place”) once I demonstrate to Buck W that goo-to-you evolution is sham science.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.