Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Press release: Iowa Supreme Court Rules in Marriage Case
Iowa Supreme Court ^ | 04/03/2009 | Iowa Supreme Court

Posted on 04/03/2009 8:01:29 AM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last
To: Liberty1970

—Why limit it there? I want to marry my furniture so I can claim additional tax deductions.—

I want to marry my computer. I spend enough time with it, after all!


121 posted on 04/03/2009 4:30:03 PM PDT by seatrout (I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ramjet50

Being 12 minutes from the Missouri border you don’t know how many times I’ve thought of doing just that.


122 posted on 04/03/2009 4:48:51 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. 2010 awaits.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

For years, though I no longer lived there, I would claim Iowa as my home state. No longer. I will not utter it. I don’t belong there anymore. I am ashamed of the place. I am a full-fledged Tennessean now. To paraphrase Reagan: “I didn’t leave my home. My home left me.”


123 posted on 04/03/2009 5:04:54 PM PDT by troublesome creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

This needs to be stapled to John McCain, and all the rest of the hard-headed politicians who have been arguing AGAINST a constitutional amendment defining marriage. Their argument that it is a “state” issue. Well, excuse me - but the will of the people in Iowa by a large margin is that the legal definition of marriage be between one man and one woman. Period.

Yet the Iowa supreme court decides to legislate in favor of the homosexual lobby basically telling the Iowa legislature and voters “screw you”.

How is banning homosexual “marriage” against ANY Constitution in the US? My understanding is that 100% of citizens have the exact same set of rights including the right to marry someone of the opposite sex. These rulings are nothing but the granting of ADDITIONAL rights to ONE particular small (but vocal) minority. By the standards set by the IOWA Supreme court - what would be any different than a man walking in and demanding a marriage license to marry his favorite sheep?


124 posted on 04/03/2009 6:27:45 PM PDT by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Iowa has had two Democrat governors since Vilsack in 2009. Ten years under two Democrat governors can cause a lot of mischief especially when it comes to the appointment of judges.

People have to get it through their heads...the modern Democrat party is a far left party. Dem voters are acting as if their party has not changed since the days of JFK. The truth is that the Democratic party is unrecognizable from the party of forty years ago.

We have to get the message out to all our Democrat relatives, friends and neighbors. Why do you complain about liberal policies, such as big welfare, soft on crime judges, gay demands, big spending etc. when YOU keep electing Democrats. DON'T YOU KNOW THAT DEMOCRAT AND LIBERAL ARE ONE AND THE SAME!

125 posted on 04/03/2009 8:59:37 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Sorry I meant to say that Iowa has had two Democrat governors since Vilsack in 1999.


126 posted on 04/03/2009 9:01:08 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
The court's arguments are so astoundingly bizarre, it defies description.

The age of reason has passed.

127 posted on 04/04/2009 12:11:05 AM PDT by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
“”“I’m off the wall,” said Democratic Sen. Matt McCoy of Des Moines, who is openly gay. “I’m very pleased to be an Iowan.”

He may be Iowan, but he is not human.

128 posted on 04/04/2009 6:12:45 AM PDT by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot child is in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gorilla_warrior
NO! Elected judges would be an even greater disaster. Maybe the sheeple in your neck of the woods are sensible. Mob rule is something the founders DID NOT want, witness Obama.

When the sheeple vote for redistribution of wealth through the judiciary, just as they do now through the legislature, don't tell me that I didn't warn you.

129 posted on 04/04/2009 9:02:32 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: magellan
Current Iowa law does not allow cousins to marry.

New York law DOES allow first cousins to marry. Same for Massachusetts, I believe.

130 posted on 04/04/2009 9:04:41 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: manc

Word of warning: Even most conservatives from the Northeast or upper Midwest are not exactly big on aggressive Christianity. Most of the evangelical/pentecostal congregrations up here are rather small and/or dominated by blacks or hispanics. As for the RCC, well, there influence has waned considerably since Vat II, and the descendants of Catholic immigrants tend be be increasingly secularized.


131 posted on 04/04/2009 9:07:35 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

been saying the same for some time now

Many Dems especially older Dems have nothing in common with the Dem party of today and we should be getting them on to our side.

Many old time Catholic Dems are in the north east and yet they still keep voting for the Dems, and thinking it is the party of JFK when clearly it is not, it’s more of a Marxist party now with aging hippies who rule it.

I blame the GOP and maybe some republicans for keeping silent and certainly the GOP not doing AD’s right now as we speak to inform voters around the country especially in Dem states what the Dem party is doing.

Rum AD’s saying that the Dem party stands for illegals, high taxes, big spending, abortion against their catholic faith, for homo to be married and have homosexuality taught in schools,
Show the voting records of their senators and officials and let the voters know that they vote for certain unpopular bills..

If the GOP did this we’d start winning and bringing them on to our side but instead the GOP do NOTHING, ABSOLUTLY NOTHING.
They have not gone after the pre paid credit cards yet and you can be sure that we will face millions in illegal money again and then watch the GOP cry about not having enough money

FOR CRYIGN OUT LOUD GOP GET OFF YOUR ARSE AND ATTACK, PICK DEMS OFF AND SPEAK FRIGGIN UP

yes I am so pissed off with the way this country is going


132 posted on 04/04/2009 10:27:33 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

As a native Iowan, I am sad to see the major industries in the state change from agriculture and insurance to sodomy and gambling.


133 posted on 04/05/2009 12:27:11 PM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

The quickest way to get this overturned is MONEY. Several posters have joked about it, but all that is required is for three or four brave Iowa FReepers to go down to the courthouse and apply for a marriage license for 3-4 (or more)people to all get married to each other. It would be best if one of them worked for the State. Once these Judges realize they have opened the floodgates of “fairness” with respect to marriage and that the State will have to provide benefits to ALL 4 (or more)spouses, the jig is up. Oh and think of the tax deductions you could have if you had say 12 or 13 spouses! Does Iowa have State Income Tax? If they deny them, class action law suit! Violation or your new rights. Any volunteers?


134 posted on 04/05/2009 2:38:53 PM PDT by John.Galt2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

135 posted on 04/06/2009 2:26:39 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The original American Gothic subjects were a farmer and his daughter. Of course, that kind of marriage will be accepted now also under “equal protection.”


136 posted on 04/06/2009 4:04:58 AM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: ltrman61

I am really super suprised at Grassley. I’ve always thought he was so wondeful, maybe he is just getting too old.


137 posted on 04/06/2009 10:16:38 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I don’t see how electing judges would make things any worse, and I certainly see how it would make things better. Your arguments are used to justify kings and queens. If the people cannot be trusted to elect judges, they cannot be trusted to elect any other official. Lifetime appointment of unaccountable judges is not acceptable. The process of impeachment is a fraud. They cannot be removed. The purpose of elections and term limits is to remove bad politicians. It needs to be applied to judges the same as for any other government official.


138 posted on 04/06/2009 10:52:10 AM PDT by gorilla_warrior (Liberalism is a hate crime that can no longer be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: manc

All the lines of what you are saying: the Bible says “If the bugle makes the uncertain sound who will follow?”

Republicans have to have a clear understanding of what to believe in and not be afraid to say it. Many Republicans like McCain and Bush are like the classic hen-pecked husband - yes dear, yes dear, anything you say dear. The Democrats act like haridans and shrews. Notice that they are not afraid to blame Republicans. All they do is BLAME, BLAME, BLAME. I don’t know if these Republicans have been socialized to be too gentlemanly, but if seems that they are afraid of words. How silly is that.


139 posted on 04/07/2009 4:00:33 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: John.Galt2012

Plans are being made to do this. A friend(straight-father of 4) was discussing this with lawyers yesterday.


140 posted on 04/10/2009 11:14:25 AM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson