Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Press release: Iowa Supreme Court Rules in Marriage Case
Iowa Supreme Court ^ | 04/03/2009 | Iowa Supreme Court

Posted on 04/03/2009 8:01:29 AM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: iowamark

This also increases the likelihood that the US will be a target of Muslim terrorism. The Muslims (correctly) see homosexuality as an abomination. They won’t take kindly to rulings like this.


21 posted on 04/03/2009 8:36:27 AM PDT by seatrout (I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Currently, the Defense of Marriage Act(DOMA) prevents the Federal government from recognizing homosexual marriage. However, with the Congress and President that we now have, DOMA will probably be repealed soon.


22 posted on 04/03/2009 8:37:52 AM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

If equal protection applies to activities that may be approved by a court, then the phrase “equal protection” no longer has any meaning.


23 posted on 04/03/2009 8:38:22 AM PDT by HoosierHawk (Democrats - Looting American citizens for generations to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Why bother getting married at all, when marriage is undefined?

Don't forget the income tax implications for high wage earners now coming from Zero.......

24 posted on 04/03/2009 8:40:17 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Gay marriage is coming. Well, if it helps us dissolve the present corrupt union and form a smaller republic then it was a good thing.

What date should we put on the death certificate? What date did the U.S. die on?


25 posted on 04/03/2009 8:40:49 AM PDT by Professor_Leonide (I said to the young man who showed me a photo, "Who can ever be sure what is behind a mask?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Excellent post...right to the heart of the argument!


26 posted on 04/03/2009 8:42:11 AM PDT by FlashBack ('0'bama: "Katrina on a Global Level")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
These reasons, the court found, must be something other than the preservation of tradition by itself. “When a certain tradition is used as both the governmental objective and the classification to further that objective, the equal protection analysis is transformed into the circular question of whether the classification accomplishes the governmental objective, which objective is to maintain the classification.” Here, the County offered no governmental reason underlying the tradition of limiting marriage to heterosexual couples, so the court proceeded to consider the other reasons advanced by the County for the legislative classification.

This is exactly the conclusion that is reached when God is removed from the equation. Tradition is simply tradition. It has no bearing. It is changeable. It is transient. If people want to rely on marriage (or anything else) as a tradition and not as a God created and God sanctioned event then this is the inevitable result.

27 posted on 04/03/2009 8:45:34 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professor_Leonide

Sometimes you have to look at the silver lining just to get through the day.


28 posted on 04/03/2009 8:45:39 AM PDT by seatrout (I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Yikes, Iowa. Can’t keep them down on the farm when they meet the wild folks in Iowa City.
This is horrible news, but I’m getting a little used to it. Ice cubes clinking.


29 posted on 04/03/2009 8:46:06 AM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart.........2012--can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Well, if the Iowa queers move to Michigan they will be divorced as soon as they cross the state line.

We banned queer marriage and queer partnerships, or anything else of a similar nature.

30 posted on 04/03/2009 8:50:34 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Watch for people marrying their dogs, horses, etc.

After all, animals deserve love, too.


31 posted on 04/03/2009 8:50:34 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Cancel liberal newspaper, magazine & cable TV subscriptions (Free TV-dtv.gov). Stop funding the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

The only way anyone can support same-sex marriage is if one believes that marriage can be defined in any way one wants. The state of Iowa and the other states that have “legalized” same-sex marriage have just removed any logical and legal barrier to restricting marriage in any way. It will eventually be “designer” marriage.


32 posted on 04/03/2009 8:51:05 AM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateBlues

The Good Lord will bring down His wrath on Iowa. Expect crop failures, floods, or locusts. God is not mocked.


33 posted on 04/03/2009 8:51:48 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

NO ONE is being denied the right to marry. If you are a man, you can marry a woman. If you are a women, you can marry a man.

But no one is being denied the right ot marry.


34 posted on 04/03/2009 8:52:31 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Exactamundo!


35 posted on 04/03/2009 8:54:29 AM PDT by seatrout (I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

—We banned queer marriage and queer partnerships, or anything else of a similar nature.—

Better hope your state Supreme Court feels the same way. This entire mess illustrates why the concept of judicial review is a curse. Why do we tolerate a doctrine which impinges so cruelly upon the will of the masses; this will being the very foundation of a representative republic.


36 posted on 04/03/2009 8:56:23 AM PDT by seatrout (I wouldn't know most "American Idol" winners if I tripped over them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

This state is becoming more and more a bastion of liberal activism. This action was originally brought by a gay activist group in New York. A court has no right to make law! It’s time for people to realize that and stand up! It’s the constant drip drip of the dismantling of the Constitution! It must stop!


37 posted on 04/03/2009 8:59:16 AM PDT by ltrman61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

“So why limit that version of marriage to just two people? How about a menage a trois?”

Every dark cloud has a silver lining ;)


38 posted on 04/03/2009 9:02:33 AM PDT by Lou Budvis (0bama Lied and the Market Died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ltrman61

Any state that keeps electing Tom Harkin deserves no pity.


39 posted on 04/03/2009 9:02:43 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: seatrout
“Better hope your state Supreme Court feels the same way.”

It doesn't matter what they think, we changed our constitution.

40 posted on 04/03/2009 9:04:24 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson