- Nuts!
Posted on 04/11/2009 8:58:10 AM PDT by Brilliant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JQpKeyN39c
These guys feel so safe that they can say anything, even what they are really thinking.
These people have clearly lost their minds.
What political youtube moment this should be
Sorry, but the GOP has already lost the majority. And, what Schumer says is that Obama stands a chance of becoming MORE POPULAR WITH THE PEOPLE!
You bet, politicians haven’t seen anything like this since FDR! Who early on could threaten a politician just by saying he’d go public with their names.
In the 1940 election, again, won by FDR ... in his 3rd outing. He pitched the public on three US House of Representatives GOP leaders who were ISOLATIONISTS: He just said out loud: MARTIN, BARTON, AND FISH.
That was his campaign. And, the GOP lost, again.
Of course, back then, it was only the Rockefeller’s, and Chase Manhattan Bankers, who were in charge of the “country club.” Things changed when Reagan came into the White House; in spite of the republican insiders favoring Bush.
Then? Well, we got the Bush’s. And, the conservative right, along with Rush Limbaugh, owns the mind set of the GOP these days. Where they sit in the minority.
Keep in mind that the democrats are willing to discuss this in public. Even if the right screams louder and louder. They’re still not able to conceptualize a country that keeps tossing out their nominees.
Charles “Chuck U” Schumer is an absolute disgrace. He is a disgusting man.
If he is correct, and it is likely he is, this means the US becomes a second rate power. It’s on the Democrat’s watch. Incomes for the middle and lower class will drop 20-30% to match Europe’s standard of living and the country will be much more susceptible to attack. At some point people may wake up and see the utter ruin. The lifestyle they TOOK FOR GRANTED will be gone and it may be too late to get it back. Maggie Thatcher will have been proven correct when she said, “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Marxism is our nation's most serious threat.
Corollary: All Marxists lie.
Schumer always comes across as the ungainly and disliked weakling who constantly overcompensates for his insufficiency by running his big mouth and seeking adoration by sucking up to his political superior.
He has ZERO allegiance to this Republic or the oath he has sworn to...
Schumer is the poster child for despicable bastards, and desperately needs his ass kicked severely with extreme prejudice.
If you believe this, you are either a leftist troll or you're not paying attention.
How many times does it have to be conveyed?
Is there mass insanity inflicting our country is masses? ; )
Yep they do for that is a requirement to survive as a Marxist.
One doesn't have to be a Marxist to be a liar however....
The truth comes out.
I heard that and was really KOd
you need an editor
your post is incoherent
Smucky Schumer makes NY proud, what a moron.
Given his born on date ... I say it's the former
Thank you - I thought it was just me.
Never trust a guy who looks like he had a lead role in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit.”
Chucky seen here fresh from his starring role in “Who Screwed the American People (Again!).”
It was never about bipartisanship with Obummer. Obummer talks up bipartisanship but it is in fact the last thing he really wants. Obummer talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk and neither do Pelosi and Reid and all the other far left loons in Washington DC.
It was never about bipartisanship with Obummer. Obummer talks up bipartisanship but it is in fact the last thing he really wants. Obummer talks the talk but doesn’t walk the walk and neither do Pelosi and Reid and all the other far left loons in Washington DC.
Sounds like a good way to kill off the USA, once and for all.
There have always been those on the battlefield who fear the fight. In some cases they cling to the legs of those willing to fight and beg them to stop fighting in hopes that the enemy will treat them better if they willingly surrender.
Illogical at best...
That is their plan.
I know. Just engaging in some rhetoric of the obvious. ;^)
Sounds like you're making a case for more moderate Republican candidates and a centrist policy agenda. Of course, that would make us conservatives more like the Demlibs and less like traditional Americans.
I smell a troll.
And to all the RINOs in Versailles on the Potomac, THIS is how your “friends across the aisle” REALLY feel about you.
And to the few remaining Conservatives in Congress, NOW do you believe that this enemy wants you dead?
“Our Country won’t go on forever, if we stay soft as we are now. There won’t be any AMERICA because some foreign soldier will invade us and take our women and breed a hardier race!”
Lt. Gen Lewis Burwell “Chesty” Puller, USMC
LOL! Like the grass roots is going to take orders from a control freak.
Why is it that so many Jewish politicians are hell bent on running everyone else's lives?
And, the conservative right, along with Rush Limbaugh, owns the mind set of the GOP these days. Where they sit in the minority.Funny how easily manipulated people come here thinking it will work on Conservatives because they fell for the leftist talking points like good little lackeys.If you believe this, you are either a leftist troll or you're not paying attention.
I couldn’t disagree with your analysis more. The Republicans lost because they were perceived as a big government party, little different than the Democrats. The Republicans lost because they nominated a weak, inarticulate, candidate who lacked core conservative principles.
GW Bush was a big government guy. I would hardly consider him a fiscal or economic conservative. Social? Yes. National security? Yes. But he was not an economic conservative and the most important issues in the last election cycles was economic.
Earlier, we lost the House and Senate when the electorate failed to perceive a difference between Republicans and Democrats. The GOP congressional delegation acted Democrats at a 10% discount. When given a choice between an imitation Democrat and a real one, the public chose the real thing.
Even with all of the disadvantages, we might have won the White House if we had a viable conservative candidate. McCain is hardly a conservative. His positions are all over the map. Obama, who the media failed to vet and inform the public about, actually ran to the right of McCain economically with a populist twist, promising a tax cut for everyone but the uberwealthy. Even so, without the financial collapse and the Paulson/Geithner Goldman Sachs bailout plan, McCain might still have won.
Obama was a Rorschach candidate. People looked at him and saw whatever they wanted. They voted for him without knowing why, without reason. He’s now in the process of defining himself by his actions and inactions. If the remaining 45 months are like the first 3, America will get to know him well and his popularity will tank.
Obama is not FDR II. He’s Jimmy Carter’s second term. The parallels between Obama and Carter are striking. Carter was also an unknown Rorschach candidate.
Carter and Obama’s elections were similar. Obama received 53% of the popular vote. Obama didn’t have a 3rd party candidate. Carter did. Add Eugene McCarthy’s vote total to Carter and he received 52%. Strikingly, he defeated a sitting president (a moderate Republican, BTW).
Their initial popularity ratings are similar. Carter/Obama Year 1 Total Approval Ratings...
Feb 04 66%/62%
Feb 18 71%/61%
Mar 04 70%/60%
Mar 18 75%/57%
Mar 22 72%/56%
Apr 01 67%/57%
Carter was more popular than Obama at this point.
The Democrats dominated with Carter and Obama. In the 95th Congress Democrats held 61 Senate seats and 292 House seats. In the 111th Congress Democrats hold 56 (effectively 58) Senate seats and 256 House seats with one seat still up for grabs in either chamber.
The Democrats had slightly better control of Congress after Carter was elected.
Both Obama and Carter are ideological, naive about the nature of the world and our enemies, wrong economically, terrible on energy, and unwilling to compromise.
This is not 1932 all over again. It’s 1976. If the Republicans can manage to nominate a candidate who presents a clear difference to Obama in 2012, we win. If we nominate another mushy, wobbly RINO, we lose and the country loses.
FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.
What a bunch of bovine excrement. What the Hell are you doing posting on a board that’s “in the minority” then?
the schmuck is now the Senior Senator from NY.....LOL...I prefer Former Senator.....just like hilly is now.
The truth comes out.
___________
Truth my a**. Those are fighting words from one of the Marxists out to make OUR country into a Cuba.!
As Hitler explained in Mein Kampf:
The size of a lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies but would be ashamed to tell big ones.
It did not lose it, it threw it away--again. Bombard people with a beggar mailer a week, and then tell them their thoughts on the Border, illegal aliens, abortion, etc. are 'too extremist' (albeit they are Constitutional mandates), and then, in the guise of 'fiscal conservatism' piss money away like Democrats used to (Dems have moved the standard of late), and the 'big tent' gets a whole lot smaller.
So does the kitty at election time.
We might get 'stuck' with all this 'centrism', but we don't have to shell out our hard-earned money to support it.
Well, we got the Bush’s. And, the conservative right, along with Rush Limbaugh, owns the mind set of the GOP these days.
As the saying goes, that does not compute.
Bush was to the right of Kerry and Algore, but hardly a Conservative.
Had the Conservative Right owned the Party, the nominee would have been Duncan Hunter, not Juan McCain. We have spent so much time under the GOP bus we know the chassis wiring.
I don't take advice from lying, deceitful bottom-dwellers like Schumer.
He can stick it up a nostril.
Thanks for the ping!
This sounds like good material for an ad against Schumer, who is running for re-election in 2010. Of course, he never should have been elected in 1998 but for Damato’s mistakes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.