Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/07/2009 10:35:54 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: nickcarraway

Outruns, what is this shit sounds like the black house is running the anti pirate scheme.


48 posted on 05/07/2009 10:58:43 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Pitiful. Like a hawk chased by blue jays.

Just PITIFUL.


52 posted on 05/07/2009 11:00:05 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

They RAN AWAY instead of engaging?

What is going on?


57 posted on 05/07/2009 11:02:14 AM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I damned sure don’t like the idea of a US Navy vessel running from the bastards! This is absolutely disgusting!


62 posted on 05/07/2009 11:04:23 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Why does the upi even post such a short do nothing story?

upi UnAmerican Political Indoctrination.

74 posted on 05/07/2009 11:13:44 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; All

The USNS Sacagawea (the second in the line of Lewis and Clark class ships) is armed with 2 to 6 12.7 mm or 7.62 machine guns.

Don’t see any armament listed for the USNS Lewis and Clark.

Correcting a design flaw maybe with the Sacagawea?


75 posted on 05/07/2009 11:15:02 AM PDT by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Why are WE running??


81 posted on 05/07/2009 11:22:44 AM PDT by MrLee (Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
How about placing several of these sea going electronic Gatling guns on every Navy ship?
82 posted on 05/07/2009 11:23:02 AM PDT by jws3sticks (WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Are we practicing for maneuvers with the French?


87 posted on 05/07/2009 11:27:16 AM PDT by Waryone (If the democrats paid taxes like the rest of us, the United States wouldn't have a deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Lawd Almighty, why aren’t the puckers pish pood?


88 posted on 05/07/2009 11:27:22 AM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

We are a nation of wimps, I absolutely cannot take it. What a disgrace.


89 posted on 05/07/2009 11:31:22 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

We out ran em??? !!

Huh...


96 posted on 05/07/2009 11:35:54 AM PDT by Former MSM Viewer ("We will hunt the terrorists in every dark corner of the earth. We will be relentless." W 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The might U S Navy is turning and running from pirates in skiffs????? WTF????


97 posted on 05/07/2009 11:35:59 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

If the Navy ship was carrying munitions, wouldn’t there be a chance a rocket propelled grenade or small arms fire from the pirates might blow up the whole ship?

If so, running away from a fight seems the right thing to do.


102 posted on 05/07/2009 11:45:29 AM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Maybe the pirates were Union Pirates and “0” doesn't want to risk a backlash.
107 posted on 05/07/2009 11:56:40 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Class and type: Lewis and Clark-class cargo ship
Displacement: 41,000 tons (41,700 t)
Length: 689 ft (210 m)
Beam: 105.6 ft (32.2 m)
Draft: 29.9 ft (9.1 m)
Propulsion: Integrated propulsion and ship service electrical system, with generation at 6.6 kV by FM/MAN B&W diesel generators; one fixed pitch propeller; bow thruster
Speed: 20 knots (37 km/h)


110 posted on 05/07/2009 12:06:06 PM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Ballsy - attack a USNS ship? One would think such vessels would be an excellent trial platform for ship mounted non-lethals, if such things exist. Problem is probably range. Your non-lethals may not have the effective range to deal with RPG’s and 50’s.

Another thing you might try would be smaller versions of drones. They are developing some sweet new smaller-form factor missile types that ride better on smaller drones.

Another surprising sort of thing: We used to operate these ships that had large dirigibles on tethers. On the dirigibles were radar. Around the dirigibles were surface assets and guard ships. The guard ships protected the radar asset. The other surface assets were used to pursue vessels of interest.

A combination of one of these radar ships, a helicopter carrier, and some patrol boats and you have an end to piracy off of Somalia. There’s about 700 to 800 miles of Somalian coastline in the Gulf of Aden. Not impossible to bottle up. Air assets can make quick work of the distance, and they’ve got enough firepower to give bad guys a moment of pause, even if you don’t want to kill them with it.

Not going to happen.


112 posted on 05/07/2009 12:10:55 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

With all that ammo on board? McGyver + Swiss Army Knife = Lots of dead pirates.


113 posted on 05/07/2009 12:11:18 PM PDT by Moltke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Back in the late 1960’s and early 70’s ammunition ships along with the oilers and supply ships were actually USS Navy ships and were armed. To bad we now contract those services out.


114 posted on 05/07/2009 12:21:03 PM PDT by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
“...pirate vessels, chased the Lewis and Clark...”

US Navy runs from two pirate skiffs??

Surely, that is simply not possible. The Lewis and Clark has to be French.

118 posted on 05/07/2009 12:31:19 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson