I hope not. This site would be out of business.
But it's certainly possible to do these things without mentioning his race.
It may not have been your intent, but you have to consider how these words come across.
I don't think the Navy alters its ROE simply because of the skin color of the president. One can imagine a number of possible black presidents - say, Colin Powell (be he RINO or not), Michael Steele, etc. - which wouldn't seem likely to prompt such questions.
It is my contention, that Obama's decisions and his race can NOT be separated.
His 20 years in a hate pit "church" - preaching black racism and Black Liberation Theology make ignoring his race and his racist foundation -- IMPOSSIBLE.
Obama and his supporters use every opportunity to call attention to his race....why should we not view him in the same window?
"I don't think the Navy alters its ROE simply because of the skin color of the president."
The Navy in under the direct control of the CIC - the President... It is the PRESIDENT's unproved ability to make decisions that are FREE of his undeniable Leftist, black racism and life long association with anti-American Marxists and self declared terrorists that I fear.... His relationship and early support of his confessed Muslim Islamist terrorist Uncle in Kenya can not be ignored......
Even a casual review of nearly every act by Obama and his administration have followed a radical Left tack - and casting America in a negative role with his constant apologizing for America and without question - BOWING to the King of Saudi Arabia... That act really ripped it for me.
I question this president's ability, loyalty and trustworthiness in the position of CIC - and fear his influence is detrimental to National Security. I believe a large measure of that is directly related to his history and resentment of his experiences as a half black, half African - who appears resentful of his white half.