Posted on 05/27/2009 11:38:04 PM PDT by SolidWood
The Alaska Personnel Board, clearly frustrated with the pile of ethics complaints filed against Gov. Sarah Palin, wants to publicize the cost of dealing with them.
The personnel board members decided at a Wednesday meeting to work with the attorney general's office on how to make public the cost of addressing each ethics complaint, without violating the board's confidentiality rules.
"We've spent pretty close to about a third of a million dollars, and it's getting to be really expensive," said Al Tamagni, a member of the board.
Also Wednesday, the three-member board dismissed another complaint, this one involving Palin and her political action committee, and heard testimony from a woman who asserted fear of retaliation has prevented her from filing a complaint against the governor.
(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...
Another McLeod Ethics Complaint Fails -(13 Ethics complaints against Sarah Palin's office dismissed)
Board dismisses Palin ethics complaint
Governor Palin Always On The Job & Putting Alaska 1st
State hiring freeze ends June 1
Corrections union sues Palin administration
For more Information visit:
Palin PING! - No.13 - May 28, 2009
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
Why should the Rats care what it costs the citizens of Alaska, so long as they sideline this major threat?
Making the costs and parties public is exactly what needs to happen.
Are there not laws against frivolous litigation, or using the courts for the purpose of harassment?
This is a disturbing action by the Democrats against this woman...
I am seeing actions that are national (rather that state) which suggest that she is a target nationally. This of course, means that they fear her and her promise in future elections. No problem...let them continue to condemn her and let the public see what is happening...She will prevail!...
The question is : WHO is coordinating all those attacks against PALIN ?
And what’s their goal?
Curiously all those complaints came since the last electoral campaign! Some political goals?
RHINOS and ZEROBAMA in the tank?
S.PALIN must be financially supported!
I suppose she can receive fundings....
That’s too easy...
The question is : WHO is coordinating all those attacks against PALIN ?
Easy, the Democratic party - all of them... Destroy her is their goal...
And what’s their goal?
To diminish or destroy her chances of election...She is way too normal of a person (non-politician) to be trusted...
Curiously all those complaints came since the last electoral campaign! Some political goals?
Yes, but she is still a threat to the Democrats. A normal person with normal views will always confuse Democrats...
If she runs, she will be supported! She is a favorite of very many Conservative and Republican voters!
People of the world UNITE against those who seek to divide and conquer.
http://www.thedailychange.com/
They should bill the DNC.
They could care less if they prevail. The whole objective is to harass her should she run in 2012. Then the New York Times, LA Times, the networks, etc., will look back at 2008 and 2009 and crow that Governor Palin had been the subject of 12 ethics complaints (or whatever the number may get to), and then not explain that they were all frivolous. They know that they can just say the number of complaints and then report them as if they were all valid.
If we had “loser pays”, this problem would quickly disappear.
I’m with you on this one. Something needs to change.
yep.
You mean you don’t?
Surely even so, if a legal action is brought that is clearly motivated by malice, greed or unsubstantiated claims, then Palin could counter-sue?
This is very simple to correct. If you sue and you loose, then you pay the costs. Would that not put a screeching halt to frivolous lawsuits? I think it would solve it.
This is a political problem - not a judicial problem... You should understand the difference.... Just look at the past and you will either understand or you are a Democrat...
The Clinton trip to China cost taxpayers about $30 million. In the photos of the trip were friends and family. I didn't/don't think the taxpayers should pay for friends and family members to take nice vacations. If the IRS won't let a business person write off the expense of their family and friends on a business trip, government officials should not have that benefit.
If she’d sue the Indonesian for eligibility, I’d donate!!!!!
“Hey, lemme hijack this thread and pimp my blog”
Your aggressive statement is unjustified, and also illogical.
The motivation for these legal actions is purely political, as evidenced by the fact that nobody did any of them before Palin came onto the political main stage. But if it is a political battle it is being fought on a judicial front. Therefore surely the way to fight back is also on the judicial front. Once people discover they have to pay for making their unfounded, stupid, and politically motivated assaults, then they will soon stop.
Of course there are. Palin has no greater rights than anyone else, but she has (or shouldn’t have) any fewer either. If people are libelling her with these frivolous lawsuits, hoping that people will equate “no smoke without fire” then they should be counter-sued for defamation of character.
send the bill to the DNC.
Sounds like a backlash is brewing and the ankle biters are getting nervous.
Follow the money...
“Money-Grubbing Smear Merchants Rex Butler and Tank Jones Target Governor Palin”
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/05/money-grubbing-smear-merchants-rex_01.html
“The Secret Side of David Axelrod”
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/mar2008/db20080314_121054.htm
Governor Palin is pro-2nd Amendment, pro-life, pro-drilling, anti-tax and she has a real reverence for the Constitution. She’s conservative.
She grates on the nerves of lib’s which is why they think that they have to trash her so heavily week-in and week-out. Demonizing the enemy is the RATS prime directive particularly since Palin inspires resistance to their collectivist mission.
The main story here seems to be she is a career woman in politics, and the pathological hatred from Dem’s for a true family values woman who does more than they could, is frightening. I am disgusted with these hit piece lawsuits, especially since they ignore all the negative about the ‘Messiah.’
I’d settle for traditional common sense long before the Harvard gangsters succeed in bankrupting this country. If Palin runs on a common sense agenda, and doesn’t take the bait, I think she’ll go far.
She has my vote.
I suppose she can receive fundings....
She has a legal defense fund which was established in April, the Alaska Fund Trust: http://www.thealaskafundtrust.com/
Gov. Palin has chosen to limit the maximum amount anyone can donate to $150.
WHO is coordinating all those attacks against PALIN ?
One of the filers of the complaints is one Linda Biegle, who was the official DNC blogger in Alaska during the campaign. She admits that she has no paying job, but is an “activist.” We also know that the other filers, Andree McLeod, Tompkins, Henning, Chatman, meet with Shannyn Moore who writes for the Huffington Post, and coordinates much of their activity through Jean Davon through her website Mudflats. These people meet, call, email each other on a regular basis, they have admitted this, and Moore has even written about it for the Huffington Post. Once they file these frivilous complaints, they can count on getting on the local TV, and getting a big story in the Anchorage Daily News.
Essentially, what we have is a conspiracy to defame Gov. Palin through abuse of the ethics complaint system, which passes the cost on to the State of Alaska.
It would be interesting to unravel the money trail, who is paying all these “activists,” because even activists have to eat. Who is paying for the websites they operate, Mudflats, and Divasblueoasis?
My bet is that the money is originating with the DNC, being laundered through some sort of Axelrod enterprise, and then funneled to them through moveon.org or some other George Soros funded front group.
It would be a great investigative journalism coup for someone to unravel it all. My guess is, if enough pressure was put on one of these pathetic creatures, he or she would crack like an egg, and spill their guts.
It's very Alinskyan:
RULE 11: “Pick a target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.”
RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up."
If Barack Obama has been the most remarkable phenomenon of the recent political scene, Sarah Palin must be second. The emotional responses to each-- especially by the media and the intelligentsia -- go beyond anything that can be explained by the usual political differences of opinion on issues of the day.
That liberals would be thrilled by another liberal is not surprising. But there are conservative Republicans who voted for Barack Obama, and other conservatives who may not have voted for him, but who are quick to see in various pragmatic moves of his since taking office an indication that he is not an extremist.
Anyone familiar with history knows that Hitler and Stalin were pragmatic. After years of denouncing each other, they signed the Nazi-Soviet pact under which they became allies for a couple of years before going to war against one another.
Pragmatism tells you nothing about extremism. But the conservative intellectuals who seize upon President Obama's pragmatism to give him the benefit of the doubt are obviously bending over backward for some reason.
With Governor Palin, it is just the opposite. The conservative intelligentsia who react against her have remarkably little to say that will stand up to scrutiny. People who actually dealt with her, before she became a national figure, have expressed how much they were impressed by her intelligence.
Governor Palin's "inexperience" is a talking point that might have some plausibility if it were not for the fact that Barack Obama has far less experience in actually making policies than Sarah Palin has. Joe Biden has had decades of experience in being both consistently wrong and consistently a source of asinine statements.
Governor Palin's candidacy for the vice presidency was what galvanized grass roots Republicans in a way that John McCain never did. But there was something about her that turned even some conservative intellectuals against her and provoked visceral anger and hatred from liberal intellectuals.
Perhaps the best way to try to understand these reactions is to recall what Eleanor Roosevelt said when she first saw Whittaker Chambers, who had accused Alger Hiss of being a spy for the Soviet Union. Upon seeing the slouching, overweight and disheveled Chambers, she said, "He's not one of us."
The trim, erect and impeccably dressed Alger Hiss, with his Ivy League and New Deal pedigree, clearly was "one of us." As it turned out, he was also a liar and a spy for the Soviet Union. Not only did a jury decide that at the time, the opening of the secret files of the Soviet Union in its last days added more evidence of his guilt.
The Hiss-Chambers confrontation of more than half a century ago produced the same kind of visceral polarization that Governor Sarah Palin provokes today.
Before the first trial of Alger Hiss began, reporters who gathered at the courthouse informally sounded each other out as to which of them they believed, before any evidence had been presented. Most believed that Hiss was telling the truth and that it was Chambers who was lying.
More important, those reporters who believed that Chambers was telling the truth were immediately ostracized. None of this could have been based on the evidence for either side, for that evidence had not yet been presented in court.
For decades after Hiss was convicted and sent to federal prison, much of the media and the intelligentsia defended him. To this day, there is an Alger Hiss chair at Bard College.
Why did it matter so much to so many people which of two previously little-known men was telling the truth? Because what was on trial was not one man but a whole vision of the world and a way of life.
Governor Sarah Palin is both a challenge and an affront to that vision and that way of life-- an overdue challenge, much as Chambers' challenge was overdue.
Whether Governor Palin runs for national office again is something that only time will tell. But the Republicans need some candidate who is neither one of the country club Republicans nor-- worse yet-- the sort of person who appeals to the intelligentsia.
I've been trying to convince my fellow conservatives that they have been wasting their time in a fruitless quest for a new Ronald Reagan to emerge and lead our party and our nation. I insisted that we'd never see his like again because he was one of a kind.
I was wrong!
Wednesday night I watched the Republican National Convention on television and there, before my very eyes, I saw my Dad reborn; only this time he's a she.
And what a she!
In one blockbuster of a speech, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin resurrected my Dad's indomitable spirit and sent it soaring above the convention center, shooting shock waves through the cynical media's assigned spaces and electrifying the huge audience with the kind of inspiring rhetoric we haven't heard since my Dad left the scene.
This was Ronald Reagan at his best -- the same Ronald Reagan who made the address known now solely as "The Speech," which during the Goldwater campaign set the tone and the agenda for the rebirth of the traditional conservative movement that later sent him to the White House for eight years and revived the moribund GOP.
Last night was an extraordinary event. Widely seen beforehand as a make-or-break effort -- either an opportunity for Sarah Palin to show that she was the happy warrior that John McCain assured us she was, or a disaster that would dash McCain's presidential hopes and send her back to Alaska, sadder but wiser.
Obviously un-intimidated by either the savage onslaught to which the left-leaning media had subjected her, or the incredible challenge she faced -- and oozing with confidence -- she strode defiantly to the podium and proved she was everything and even more than John McCain told us.
Much has been made of the fact that she is a woman. What we saw last night, however, was something much more than a just a woman accomplishing something no Republican woman has ever achieved. What we saw was a red-blooded American with that rare, God-given ability to rally her dispirited fellow Republicans and take up the daunting task of leading them -- and all her fellow Americans -- on a pilgrimage to that shining city on the hill my father envisioned as our nation's real destination.
In a few words she managed to rip the mask from the faces of her Democratic rivals and reveal them for what they are -- a pair of old-fashioned liberals making promises that cannot be kept without bankrupting the nation and reducing most Americans to the status of mendicants begging for their daily bread at the feet of an all-powerful government.
Most important, by comparing her own stunning record of achievement with his, she showed Barack Obama for the sham that he is, a man without any solid accomplishments beyond conspicuous self-aggrandizement.
Like Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin is one of us. She knows how most of us live because that's the way she lives. She shares our homespun values and our beliefs, and she glories in her status as a small-town woman who put her shoulder to the wheel and made life better for her neighbors.
Her astonishing rise up from the grass-roots, her total lack of self-importance, and her ordinary American values and modest lifestyle reveal her to be the kind of hard-working, optimistic, ordinary American who made this country the greatest, most powerful nation on the face of the earth.
As hard as you might try, you won't find that kind of plain-spoken, down-to-earth, self-reliant American in the upper ranks of the liberal-infested, elitist Democratic Party, or in the Obama campaign.
Sarah Palin didn't go to Harvard, or fiddle around in urban neighborhood leftist activism while engaging in opportunism within the ranks of one of the nation's most corrupt political machines, never challenging it and going along to get along, like Barack Obama.
Instead she took on the corrupt establishment in Alaska and beat it, rising to the governorship while bringing reforms to every level of government she served in on her way up the ladder.
Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time around.
On a random and exciting note - I got a card in the mail yesterday from Sarah Palin! :) I will be saving that FOREVER! Looks to be hand written and actually signed by her - not the typical computer generated crap that is very impersonal - I was quite pleased & flabbergasted that I got something!
Did you write to her requesting a card? If so, how long did it take to get a response?
You’re so lucky
I wrote to her after the election at the end of November - not a request just a long thank you and an appreciate for someone like her on the political scene and how I admired her being a young female who now wants to get involved in politics :) I’m not sure if it was that letter that triggered the card and they are just getting around to writing back (5-6 months backlog - which is definitely feasible) or the donations to SarahPac but I will assume it is the former rather than the latter!
Well then, by all means Andree, Pony UP your wallet if it is that important. Or is your mouth only engaged on Other Peoples Money?
I agree. If Palin is going to pay for her children on state required trips, Obama should also pay. Why is there two standards for ethics? Ethics is not party sensitive.
Linda Biegle
Oink!
You’re right... I apologize!. Was carried away by the rhetoric...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.