101 evidences for a young age of the earth...and the universe

CMI ^ | June 4, 2009 | Don Batten, Ph.D.

[GodGunsGuts]

101 evidences for a young age of the earth...and the universe

Can science prove the age of the earth?

There are many different categories of evidence that the cosmos and the earth are much younger than is generally asserted today...

[freedumb2003]

>>Let me guess, you are really a Christian and are posting this stuff to make the atheists look bad.<<

The irony ... the irony...

[editor-surveyor]

"Well obviously you are Mr. Bible-Scholar and are above all of us."

Nice try! How many of you are there in "us?"

Your twisting of the facts and reliance on misapplied sarcasm tells much about your character.

[freedumb2003]

Hey, here is an idea: link scientific sites as opposed to WWN-related sites.

Just an idea.

Of course, maybe this post happened before your post. Since time dilates according to how much brew you have chugged. Or something.

[freedumb2003]

Are you still back-door apologizing for your vote for obama?

Dude, we almost forgive you.

But please don’t do it again.

[freedumb2003]

>>Your twisting of the facts and reliance on misapplied sarcasm tells much about your character.<<

The irony... the irony...

[editor-surveyor]

So you are God’s appointed trickster?

Interesting! - It sheds new light on your bizzare presence here.

As for evolution, there really is nothing there to grasp. All one needs to understand is that as it became apparent that their dreams were mathematically impossible, those that sought a creation without a creator imagined up more and more time for their impossible dream to happen.

But impossible is still impossible. Statistical improbability is actually an inadequate term to describe the dream of evolution.

[editor-surveyor]

The irony in your head-ery?

You are a pathetic pile of “unmentionable”

[freedumb2003]

>>So you are God’s appointed trickster?

Tsk tsk tsk — your attempting to sway people into lies is not going to go well in the afterlife.

>>Interesting! - It sheds new light on your bizzare presence here.<<

The irony... the irony...

>>As for evolution, there really is nothing there to grasp. All one needs to understand is that as it became apparent that their dreams were mathematically impossible, those that sought a creation without a creator imagined up more and more time for their impossible dream to happen.<<

I always enjoy the standard “I don’t understand something so I will knock it with nonsense” defense. It cracks me up (as it no doubt does so many observers of this thread).

So, was it your mama or your daddy or both that made you feel you had to become “special” in denying simple science? Because I can understand how you use God rather than worshiping Him to aggrandize yourself.

BTW — you should see a doctor about that mole on your cheek.

>>But impossible is still impossible. Statistical improbability is actually an inadequate term to describe the dream of evolution.<<

Thanks for telling everyone in the Internet how little you know. It saves me a LOT of time.

:)

[freedumb2003]

>>You are a pathetic pile of “unmentionable”<<

And you are classic case of the “Christian who really uses Christianity as a badge of self-importance.”

Keep it coming — you dig your hole deeper post by post.

:)

[GSWarrior]

Isn’t it possible that God created the cosmos millions of years ago?

[GodGunsGuts]

Not according to God’s Word, the Bible. I think you might find the following quite interesting, while at the same time showing you how a creation scientist might interpret such a question.

http://creation.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter5.pdf

All the best—GGG

[tpanther]

Oh c’mon, ‘dumb, anyone that’s been on FR for 2 days understands you’re the zerrhoid sir-project-alot.

[GSWarrior]

Without sounding blasphemous, the Bible has been edited too many times by man, IMHO. Anyway, why not let the mystery be?

[freedumb2003]

>>Oh c’mon, ‘dumb, anyone that’s been on FR for 2 days understands you’re the zerrhoid sir-project-alot.

And everyone on FR knows you are a obama-supporting libtard who is trying desperately to convince people that you made the “right” decision.

[freedumb2003]

>>Isn’t it possible that God created the cosmos millions of years ago?

Billions — and that is what people who understand science agree upon, irrespective of their theological bent.

[tpanther]

Hissy Fit Matthews? Is that you?

[GodGunsGuts]

Either you believe it is the Word of God or you don’t. If you don’t, then I understand why you would be incredulous. However, creationists do believe the Bible in matters of doctrine, theology, salvation, morals, history, etc. Thus, if the Bible says such and such happened at a given time, then the bible-believing Christian believes that whatever evidence remains from said happening will fit with the biblical description of the same.

PS Did you give the link I sent you a quick read? What did you think of Einstein’s General Relativity/Time Dilation allowing for the Earth to be thousands of years old, and distant stars to be billions of years old, and yet both owe their existence to the SAME creation event???

[Oztrich Boy]

And while it is true that agricultural societies usually grow, sometimes rapidly, such things aren't generally seen in non-agricultural societies.

Not quite correct.

Simplifying (but not as redicuously as Creationists do) there have been three levels of growth

• Preagricultural ~ 0.00%
• Agricultural ~0.1%
• industrial ~2%

Then along comes Morris and take "one quarter of the last" as "reasonable" just because it creates the answer he wants without any analysis of what is actually happening and why. (much like a AGW believer)

[freedumb2003]

>>Either you believe it is the Word of God or you don’t. If you don’t, then I understand why you would be incredulous. However, creationists do believe the Bible in matters of doctrine, theology, salvation, morals, history, etc. Thus, if the Bible says such and such happened at a given time, then the bible-believing Christian believes that whatever evidence remains from said happening will fit with the biblical description of the same.<<

Either you are “special” or you are capable of understanding subtleties and nuances about the Bible that Biblical scholars have been debating for thousands of years. Real scholars and not people who use the Bible to make up for mommy and daddy’s bad parenting skills.