Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bodies Found From Air France Plane Crash
SkyNews ^

Posted on 06/06/2009 9:56:25 AM PDT by traumer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last
To: zeebee
Do you think the truth will ever be made public?

that Airbuses are death traps? Pretty much know. I haven't flown one since one lost its tail taking off from LaGuardia.

101 posted on 06/06/2009 1:44:53 PM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
I deal in facts when assessing aircraft mishaps.

Conjecture is fun but when actually assessing the whys of something, facts are key, not what ifs. Maybe it was a meteor strike, or perhaps alien abduction, or maybe it was a Mission Impossible scenario of an escaping scientist trying to get away from the evil corporate armies. . .those MAY have happened. . .before an investigation revealed the facts of the why (cause). You go where the facts lead you. Anything beyond fact-based analysis is mere conjecture.

Have a nice day. Game over.

But hey, I like a good conspiracy like the next guy. They are fun to play with.

102 posted on 06/06/2009 1:46:08 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Drago
It is getting to the point where every aviation accident has it’s instant conspiracy theorists

No. There was a bomb threat for a flight from Rio to Paris and a few days later that same flight goes down. So terrorism has to be near the top of the list of possible causes.

103 posted on 06/06/2009 1:56:03 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

The vast majority of “home mechanics” are dealing with GASOLINE tanks — not jet fuel whose vapor is significantly less combustible than gasoline. U.S. commercial jets use a fuel that is essentially kerosene.

Then too - there are 10s of thousands of flights DAILY with far less than full fuel tanks - and how many “spontaneous explosions” have you heard about?

I don’t doubt the fuel ignited — my suspicion is that it was IGNITED from an EXTERNAL source and not internal to the system.

I remain convinced that TWA 800 was brought down, either intentionally or my some horrible accident initiated by some force OUTSIDE of the aircraft...


104 posted on 06/06/2009 2:13:57 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
No doubt. I've been thinking of something like a massive sandstorm ~ would start out as a field of loosely knit cometary "boulders" hitting the atmosphere, and then turning into particles traveling several tens of thousands of miles an hour.

That'd undoubtedly take out a plane ~ even one without a center tank. Just shear the wings right off of it, and if it was a big enough storm, maybe the static electricity you'd have in a storm like that would shut down the electronic components one by one.

105 posted on 06/06/2009 2:17:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Yeah ... just like the “truth” about TWA 800.

Nelson DeMille has a good take on that. The "evidence" in the book was "lost" on 9/11.

I sure wish I could recall the name of the book...

106 posted on 06/06/2009 2:25:35 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zeebee; Perdogg

Wouldn’t make any difference. Any report, however accurate, will be presumed a coverup.

So, truth: Maybe yes. Maybe no. Consensus? Not a chance in hell.


107 posted on 06/06/2009 2:28:37 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

So, what, you presume someone asked for a Bud Light and someone pulled out a cigarette lighter instead?


108 posted on 06/06/2009 2:37:29 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

Nightfall.

But I preferred Mayday.


109 posted on 06/06/2009 2:45:37 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face
Night Fall
110 posted on 06/06/2009 2:46:43 PM PDT by PuzzledInTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

I read where loss of cabin pressure at high altitude results in blackout in 10 sec.


111 posted on 06/06/2009 2:48:26 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

I like ALL his books.
I read them when I find them. And thanks for the title!!

;o]


112 posted on 06/06/2009 2:50:18 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: PuzzledInTX; Larry Lucido

You’re awesome! It’s good to know I’m not the only Nelson Fan!!


113 posted on 06/06/2009 2:51:06 PM PDT by Monkey Face (Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

You’ve got to be joking. I’ve seen similar o-ring failures on a smaller scale in gas distribution systems. Only difference is the ones I’ve seen caused a mess instead of exploding because there wasn’t an ignition source anywhere near it.

The o-rings weren’t a cover up.


114 posted on 06/06/2009 3:01:23 PM PDT by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
No. There was a bomb threat for a flight from Rio to Paris and a few days later that same flight goes down. So terrorism has to be near the top of the list of possible causes.

 I am aware of the bomb threat, and I agree that terrorism/bomb is in the top 10 probable causes, but where is the conspiracy to cover that up?? 

115 posted on 06/06/2009 3:07:20 PM PDT by Drago (FAA certified A&P mechanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
"Actually I was thinking that if the airplane broke up suddenly the forces applied would have killed them."

Not if some reports are true and the plane was flying slowly due to sensor malfunctions. The forces involved could be no worse than a bad car wreck.

I'm expecting the slow-speed conjecture will gain weight in the coming days. One or both engine and/or the composite tail or flight-control surfaces might have sheared off as a consequence of abrupt side winds on a plane traveling too slowly. As AA587 showed--even if you believe the official explanation, which became even more questionable after the Air Transat flight from Cuba lost its rudder--the Airbus tail assembly is laterally weak, and in AA587's case both engines came off as the plane spiraled, too. I'm suspecting something similar happened, a big tragic cascade of structural failures exacerbated by the Airbus' reliance on flight systems automation.
116 posted on 06/06/2009 3:10:23 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: halfright
"Pop two benedryl and sleep all the way there... :)"

Please don't. Deep-vein thrombosis is a killer.
117 posted on 06/06/2009 3:11:55 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: traumer

If terrorists brought the plane down, why haven’t they made a public statement and taken responsibility for it?


118 posted on 06/06/2009 3:13:04 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
There was a bomb threat for a flight from Rio to Paris and a few days later that same flight goes down.

An Air France spokesman says the airline received a bomb threat for a flight from Buenos Aires to Paris on May 27, but that warning proved to be false.

119 posted on 06/06/2009 3:26:25 PM PDT by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham; F15Eagle
"I hope their deaths were instantaneous and they didn’t have to suffer the torment of an uncontrollable descent."

There is good reason to suspect that most did not suffer any torment - other than the fear brought on initially by the harsh turbulence, and breakup of the plane. But, unfortunately they didn't die instantaneously.

But, at the point that the plane broke up and cabin pressure was lost, all aboard the plane would have fairly quickly lost consciousness, and soon died (in few minutes) from lack of oxygen shortly thereafter, long before landing on the ocean surface.

The typical deployment of oxygen masks from above would have been completely ineffective for all aboard as the plane disintegrated and the system that provides the oxygen was disabled by much of the system being destroyed. In effect, they all 'went to sleep' very quickly - and now await the wakening of all dead. (Of course, none believers don't believe that will happen... and don't believe in anything 'spiritual.')

Yes, I'm certain that they did see what was happening as they were losing consciousness, and probably knew their life was over. But, many probably used that short period of time before consciousness was lost to pray, 'Into thy hands, Oh Lord...'

120 posted on 06/06/2009 3:36:39 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson