Posted on 06/10/2009 3:07:18 PM PDT by blackrobe
>I consider my oath to be binding as well. I didn’t take it lightly.
I as well.
Though there are several cases which could be treason, the aid and adherence to America’s enemies, that Obama is directly accountable for:
1 - The full pardoning of the USS Cole bomber.
2 - The dropping of charges of the 11Sep01 terrorists.
3 - The signing into law of a document he did not read (the stimulus bill).
4 - The coercion of the auto execs.
And indirectly:
1 - The dropping of the charges against the two New Black Panther members who were practicing voter-intimidation.
2 - The [specific] closing of auto-dealerships, which MAY be targeted due to their political involvements/
3 - Any ‘bailout’ of California which comes at the expense of ANY other state that he signs.
>Don’t you have to be a citizen to be charged with treason?
>0bam is Kenyan - he should be deported.
Another historic first!
“First President to be deported!”
And that SHOULD be the charge at his IMPEACHMENT trial in the spring of 2011....
Oh, and the USSC could be considered traitors for:
1 - Refusing to see/try the cases against Obama regarding his natural born status.
2 - Refusing to hear the case[s] of the GM/Chrysler bondholders, who are being cheated out of their contractual earnings/assets by sanction of the executive branch.
3 - The 25Jun05 decision (I believe Keely v. New England), wherein they validated governmental theft/larceny under guise of “Immanent Domain”.
Which is exactly why this guy hasn't been charged with anything.
The Congress, generally speaking could be tried for treason for:
1 - The mere suggestion that the AIG bonuses be retroactively taxed at 90%... this is contra-Constitutional in at LEAST four ways.
2 - The refusal to properly investigate Obama’s eligibility before validating the electoral college votes.
3 - The passing of a bill which they, self-admittedly, did not read. (The stimulus package.)
More individually, Murtha:
1 - The condemnation of active-duty Marines in a war-zone before a investigation had even finished.
2 - The judges who ruled that the law protecting federal employees performing their duties applied to him.
3 - Any other such entity who aids and adheres to Murtha.
He was referring to a comment by Evan Thomas (Newsweek?) that Obama is a sort of God.
Rush opined that O did have something in common with God.....God does not have a birth certificate either!
The silence from Obama is deafening
It’s quoted from the CFP article above.
Oop’s Thank you!
BTT
He’s at least guilty of federal document fraud for the forged CoLB he posted on the Internet as his ‘proof of natural born citizenship’. Since he has not proven he’s eligible and has posted a false document with the intent to deceive the American people and defraud the election process, then taken the oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution while violating it knowingly, YES, BARRY SOETORO, aka BArack Obama is guilty of treason. Those giving him cover to remain as head of state under those circumstances are also guilty of treason/treachery against we the people.
Finally the “T” word has been uttered. I wondered how long it would take. Thank you Canada.
Boy those Canadians will go to any length to stop our nationalized health care...they will have no place to go.
I can’t wait for Michael Moore’s movie about our amazing health care.
God Bless this soldier for his courage.
I'm going to post this so that EVERYONE who thinks we are powerless to do something about this understands how best to go about it. We need to find the legal remedy enabling us to charge our representatives with disobeying their oaths of office and start removing them one by one. Here is the case.
Exhibit A, The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 reads as follows:
" ”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
Exhibit B U. S. Code, CITE: 3USC19
TITLE 3--THE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER 1- PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES
Sec. 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act
”(a)(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. “
Exhibit C: U. S. Constitution, Article Six Oath of Office for elected officials:
” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
Exhibit D: The Electoral Vote Counting Act of 1877:
The process currently provides that someone “challenge” the electoral votes during a short, specified time frame while the Electoral College votes are opened and tabulated. This process does not cover challenges to "eligibility" qualifications. In fact, if this act pretends to do so in the manner in which it prescribes, it is unconstitutional. Any act of this sort that does not require that qualifications be presented by the President elect serves to undercut the provisions in the Constitution itself. No act that does not support the Constitution is constitutional. In order to change the requirements of the Twentieth amendment, one would need to pass another amendment. An “Act” doesn’t cut the mustard.
The portion in bold stating “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify” in section three is particularly interesting in that it plainly seems to infer that a “qualification” of some sort must be made in order to serve as President. Certainly, one cannot argue that it does not require a qualification process for one to “qualify”. To infer that the lack of a “specified” qualification process means that stated eligibility “qualifications” for the office of president can be ignored is fallacious. The wording of this passage in the twentieth amendment clearly infers that a qualification is required, regardless of how this is done.
There is only one set of qualifications listed anywhere in the Constitution that are not health related and they are listed in Article two, section one.
” No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
To satisfy meeting the requirement of the twentieth amendment to “qualify”, a president elect must present evidence that he meets it’s requirements for eligibility to serve. This means that a proper birth certificate HAD to be presented by the president elect in order to serve as president. If this was done, where is that certificate and to whom was it presented? If this was done, why would we not have the right to verify and inspect it under the freedom of information act?
If it was NOT done, then under the provisions of the twentieth amendment, Barrack Obama has “failed to qualify” and should not be serving as president of the United States of America.
Based upon the above, I conclude that:
1. We currently have a vacancy at President because no one has yet “qualified” as required in the Twentieth amendment. The terms "The President elect shall have failed to qualify" clearly places this burden upon the President elect and not on someone raising their hand in objection.
2. Anyone serving in Congress (see “Congress” in bold in Exhibit A), or anyone who is currently serving under the oath of office in Article six has "standing" and can DEMAND that their oaths be met by receiving proper “qualifying” documentation from Mr. Obama. This charade at the time of counting the Electoral College votes does not limit their ability to do so at any time they so choose. The very fact that they are duty-bound by oath to "support" the Constitution REQUIRES them to respond to any and all attacks against it. No judge can deny any of them the standing to do so. It would ask them to break the law in their effort to enforce the law.
3. We need to start pressing legal charges against all of our local representatives and senators covered by the oath of office in Article six for disobeying their oaths to support the Constitution as it pertains to the language of section three of the Twentieth amendment. Put PRESSURE on them to represent the document that gives them their authority in the first place. We are looking into how best to do this down here. We all should be looking into this approach. NOW.
Oh, do we still enforce laws against treason?
I thought they had gone the way of immigration laws.
Agreed.
Any country that could produce the McKenzie Brothers can't be all bad.
Shityeah
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.