Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Move to Repeal Presidential Term Limits
The Voice magazine ^ | June 11, 2009 | Brian Burke

Posted on 06/11/2009 2:52:11 PM PDT by truthnomatterwhat

Liberals have always covetted the return of Clinton in the Oval Office. Those were the days, if only he could run again, they dream. Can you imagine unlimited terms for any president? Nixon perhaps or Bush the second? Maybe we should bring Carter back? God forbid. Now they have Obama. What if President Barack Obama could be our President forever? Imagine that?

I know, you think this could never be in the home of the free. But Democrat Congressman José Serrano (NY) had the audicity to propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow this to happen. He introduced the House Joint Resolution 5 (HJR5) entitled: "Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President."

To give you a bit of Constitutional history, it was...

(Excerpt) Read more at thevoicemagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 4kooks; hjr5; joseserrano; oldnews; presidentialterms; termlimits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 06/11/2009 2:52:12 PM PDT by truthnomatterwhat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

Two terms is enough for any politician.


2 posted on 06/11/2009 2:53:25 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

Liberals have no intent of imposing the laws and traditions of mere men on their “god”.


3 posted on 06/11/2009 2:54:55 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

Knew this was coming-it will be slipped into some bill in the middle of the night on a Friday-or holiday weekend.

THIS is very very BAD.


4 posted on 06/11/2009 2:55:38 PM PDT by homegroan (Proud to be a Palinite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

Farewell America, we hardly knew ye.


5 posted on 06/11/2009 2:56:58 PM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: homegroan

It will have to be ratified by the States.

NOT going to happen.


6 posted on 06/11/2009 2:57:07 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

Who here on FR didn’t see this comming?


7 posted on 06/11/2009 2:57:31 PM PDT by John 3_19-21 (Tagline server crashed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: homegroan

As is everything else that’s leftist-very bad!


8 posted on 06/11/2009 2:57:32 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

kooksville


9 posted on 06/11/2009 2:57:38 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

It still has to be ratified by 2/3 of the states. Before ACORN that might not have been possible.

Gunner


10 posted on 06/11/2009 2:59:06 PM PDT by weps4ret (Where is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1

Of course it’s not.


11 posted on 06/11/2009 2:59:46 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

I give that liberal credit for at least going through the amendment process - most of the time they are shoving filth down our throats by judicial fiat or secret midnight legislation.


12 posted on 06/11/2009 3:00:37 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

‘Liberals have no intent of imposing the laws and traditions of mere men on their “god”.’

Doesn’t this need more than Congressional approval to pass? Doesn’t a supermajority of the states (2/3, or 34 states) need to vote on something like this before it can actually become law of the land?


13 posted on 06/11/2009 3:00:42 PM PDT by joejm65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

Serrano is a radical nutbag and introduced this resolution some time ago (under Bush, IIRC). It’s been floating around for quite a while and is laughable. BUT...

Under Barry, what was once laughable becomes reality. We have to keep an eye on this.


14 posted on 06/11/2009 3:01:22 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat
I seem to recall during discussions on this topic during college, that any amendment would only apply to future presidents. As I understand it, anyone elected to an office would be bound by the constitution as it was when he assumed office. Probably ways around this just as there seem to be ways around birth requirements-but that's what I remember and I'm stickin' to it!

I'd imagine, if this is correct, that any members of congress would be exempt from term limit legislation so long as they continued to hold their office. Only those elected after the amendment change would be limited to the new reg's.

15 posted on 06/11/2009 3:02:03 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

OF course if Palin ever gets into office and she gets Reagan’s approval numbers they will be screaming bloody murder to undo their abolition of term limits.


16 posted on 06/11/2009 3:02:11 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joejm65

Yep but don’t worry. ACORN is busy setting the redistricting up.


17 posted on 06/11/2009 3:04:09 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

I guess we can’t trust the citizens to vote “correctly” after 2 terms.

Pretty cynical attitude toward democracy.


18 posted on 06/11/2009 3:04:37 PM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat

Another example of the lack of thinking going on nowadays.

Ironically, probably the best way to kill this is to ask it’s supporters “Would you still support it if a Republican got elected?”


19 posted on 06/11/2009 3:05:22 PM PDT by RWB Patriot ("Let 'em learn the hard way, 'cause teaching them is more trouble than they're worth,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthnomatterwhat
Liberals have always covetted the return of Clinton... Carter..

Why restrict it to live ones? Now that the dead have the right to vote, it would be discrimination and hateful to say that FDR couldn't serve a few more terms.

20 posted on 06/11/2009 3:05:30 PM PDT by C210N (A patriot for a Conservative Renaissance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson