Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zman516
I believe the founding fathers assumed their words "natural born" would be understood as born within the confines of the United States of two citizen parents

English common law doesn't say that, and since many were lawyers then they would know that to be the case. If they had meant for the meaning to be outside of that then I would expect that they would have mentioned it somewhere in their writings. If they did, then I'm not aware of it.

You are also aware that your definition would exclude McCain, Jindal, and numerous others.

109 posted on 06/20/2009 5:58:17 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Yes, Jindal would be unqualified under that definition.

I think McCain was OK in the sense that his parents were both citizens and their home of record was within the US, even though on temporary duty in Panama at the time. It’s no different than if two US citizens had a child while visiting a foreign country. i.e., I think the important thing is two citizen parents, not location. If Zero’s father had been a US citizen this wouldn’t be an issue, obviously.


110 posted on 06/20/2009 6:19:37 PM PDT by Zman516 (socialists & muslims -- satan's useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson