Skip to comments.
Palin Exposed
New Majority ^
| July 2, 2009
| David Frum
Posted on 07/02/2009 1:25:38 PM PDT by yongin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
1
posted on
07/02/2009 1:25:38 PM PDT
by
yongin
To: yongin
2
posted on
07/02/2009 1:27:42 PM PDT
by
joejm65
To: yongin
If the old saying, “you are over the target if you are taking flack” is accurate and Palin was a bomber formation, the Nazis just lost the biggest ball bearing plant this week...
3
posted on
07/02/2009 1:28:45 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: yongin
I’m supposed to care what that twit David Frum thinks?
4
posted on
07/02/2009 1:28:51 PM PDT
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: yongin
"The McCain campaign is over. The duty of confidentiality has expired. "Therefore, the Romney bootlickers who are behind these anonymous attacks should be man enough to reveal themselves and their sponsor.
5
posted on
07/02/2009 1:29:17 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
To: yongin
6
posted on
07/02/2009 1:29:18 PM PDT
by
pgkdan
( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
To: yongin
Man I thought that this was a PICS thread ;-(!
To: yongin
"In the mysterious soup of motives that sustains her supporters, enthusiasm for effective governance does not seem a very major ingredient." WTF?
Palin ain't running deficits and she is increasing the US natural gas supply by 8% while creating real jobs in the process.
8
posted on
07/02/2009 1:30:33 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
ITEM: A year ago, 80 percent of Alaskans viewed Palin very favorably or somewhat favorably; by this spring, just 55 percent had a positive opinion. Same with Obama
9
posted on
07/02/2009 1:30:38 PM PDT
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: Albion Wilde
Yeah, good luck with that.
The have to keep Palin down so Mitt has a shot. They are still at work...
10
posted on
07/02/2009 1:31:24 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: yongin
I don’t hate David Frum because of his ideas, which suck, but which he is entitled to— I hate him because he’s a jerk. Honestly he is second only to Andrew Sullivan in bashing Sarah Palin every single chance he gets. This moron thinks he can build his “New Majority” by attacking Rush and Sarah Palin? He speaks of “moderation” and “modernity” and but uses HuffPo ad-hominem tactics.
11
posted on
07/02/2009 1:31:36 PM PDT
by
exist
To: yongin
Who stands to gain from the continued onslaught of Sarah Palin? None other that Mitt Romney and Mark Huckabee.
12
posted on
07/02/2009 1:31:41 PM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
To: yongin
Yawn. The Neo-Liberal David Frumpy tries yet again to destroy Sarah Palin.
Everyone has faults, but McCain is the co-author of American disaster -- along with his other neocon buddy Bush.
Sarah Palin's real problem is that she looks to the neos like someone they can't control - and that terrifies them.
13
posted on
07/02/2009 1:31:54 PM PDT
by
Regulator
(Welcome to Zimbabwe! Now hand over your property)
To: TommyDale
Or Mike Huckabee? Whatever his name is.
14
posted on
07/02/2009 1:32:32 PM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
To: US Navy Vet
15
posted on
07/02/2009 1:32:53 PM PDT
by
TheZMan
("I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.")
To: yongin
I’m not onboard the Palin for 2012 campaign, but I’m absolutely against Frum, McCain, or Romney.
16
posted on
07/02/2009 1:33:44 PM PDT
by
Darren McCarty
(We do what we have to do.)
To: yongin
"In the mysterious soup of motives that sustains her supporters, enthusiasm for effective governance does not seem a very major ingredient."
Ever read C.S. Lewis' That Hideous Strength?
Young Mr. Studdock is employed to write articles for newspapers explaining everything... making the news, forming the nation's opinion for the unwitting masses.
This article (and many, many like them) ring of ideological control of newspapers. Articles intended to "say it enough times and it will be true". This really is sad. And Lewis saw it in the '40's.
To: yongin
If any of this is true, why not put their name on it??? Most of it is just opinionated Bull Shit.
18
posted on
07/02/2009 1:34:30 PM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: TheZMan
We need to make sure Steve Schmidt NEVER works for a national republican campaign again.
To: yongin
WHATEVER! Palin is heads and tails above any of republocant. All these whiners can go suck an egg.
20
posted on
07/02/2009 1:35:01 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson