Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Should Reexamine the Public Good of Private Citizens
Weekly Standard ^ | July 7. 2009 | Jim Prevor

Posted on 07/07/2009 6:37:26 AM PDT by Al B.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 07/07/2009 6:37:26 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HalfFull; mick

Ping


2 posted on 07/07/2009 6:39:08 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Who said they would rather be governed by the first 10 names in a phone book than all the faculty at Harvard or something like that??


3 posted on 07/07/2009 6:40:02 AM PDT by lakertaker (Libertarian Party since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lakertaker

Bill Buckley.


4 posted on 07/07/2009 6:43:36 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Another elitist...


5 posted on 07/07/2009 6:44:27 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Reminds me of the comments from various GOP senators referring to Rush as “not a recognized GOP official” concerning his comments on the Sotomayor nomination. These turds have lost all sense of how they were placed into authority and who they are ultimately responsible to.


6 posted on 07/07/2009 6:44:38 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Sarah Palin: Sun Tzu of Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

[Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski as saying that Palin’s actions mean she has “decided to abandon the state and her constituents”—a critique Senator Murkowski never expressed toward Hillary Clinton when she resigned mid-term as a senator from New York to serve as Secretary of State.]

I also didn’t hear anyone saying this of that witch Kathleen Sebelius.


7 posted on 07/07/2009 6:44:44 AM PDT by KansasGirl (I still think Obama is just plain creepy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

An interesting argument, but it presumes that when someone actually RUNS for an office that has a term, that doing so does not imply the commitment to actually serve the term, barring something that obviously requires you to move on.

In general, if I work for a candidate to get them elected, I expect them to do the job. I understand that if they run for another office and get elected, they will have to leave — if McCain/Palin had won, nobody would be criticizing her for leaving the Governorship since she would have to do so to be VP.

So while we can argue the merits of her decision, or how much it really hurts or helps Alaska (I leave that to Alaskans), I really don’t think those who have said she was wrong say so because they have an obsession with public service.

As to Grassley’s comment, I do want the person I pick for President to have a lot of executive experience. Running a large corporation, or a large organization, would be a substitute for being in public leadership, but I’d like there to be leadership somewhere. McCain had it just a bit because he was an officer in the military. Obama had no leadership, and it shows now.

I don’t think I would ever support a person running for the President who didn’t have executive experience. Being Governor of Alaska was good executive experience, but 4 years would be better than 2.


8 posted on 07/07/2009 6:46:54 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lakertaker

Bill Buckley


9 posted on 07/07/2009 6:47:29 AM PDT by Lets Roll NOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

The GOP needs to dump all these old geezers, molding away in their D.C. offices for decades, in the next primaries. They are totally irrelevant and useless to the survival of our nation.


10 posted on 07/07/2009 6:54:12 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Al, thanks for the ping. This is a great article that perfectly expresses why we love SP. And SP herself has expressed it better than I can...."she has a servant's heart" That is what we want, that is what we need, and that is what we will demand in 2012.

I have been battling close relatives all week who are talking crap about her "quitting", being "unstable", and all the rest of the garbage.

My final argument to these fools is that she can be trusted with power. And this article is as good as any in showing that......she walked away from power and perks for the higher good

My only problem the last few days has been no patience with anyone who doesn't see it my way with SP.....I guess I'm getting old and cranky...it's going to be a long 3 yrs!

11 posted on 07/07/2009 6:54:40 AM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mick

Hang in there FRiend. I’ve got a lib sister so I can identify. Can’t stop loving her, can’t lock her in a padded room or anything, so we just pray for her...LOL. She’s deaf to any rational discussion of politics.


12 posted on 07/07/2009 7:02:50 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

CharlesWayneCT: “Being Governor of Alaska was good executive experience, but 4 years would be better than 2.”

Then you’re not buying her argument that she would do more harm to Alaska by staying rather than turning it over to another competent person? Plus you think she should operate at an extreme disadvantage, if she chooses to run for president in 2012, by trying to operate a campaign out of Alaska? And, you think she would be able to run such a campaign, serve her state, and take care of her family?

How many politicians have you know that have “served” in an office while campaigning. McCain didn’t resign as a senator, but do you honestly think he was serving his state well at the time he was campaigning?

Sarah doesn’t conform to typical political behaviors, and that’s exactly why I’m starting to like her more and more. I don’t care if she’s some deep conservative intellectual. I’m more impressed that she IS conservative.


13 posted on 07/07/2009 7:12:59 AM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mick
My final argument to these fools is that she can be trusted with power. And this article is as good as any in showing that......she walked away from power and perks for the higher good

Thanks for saying that, I've been feeling the same way. Look at the fools who cling to every powerful position they can backstab their way up to (nearly every pol in DC, and most in state govt). On the other hand here is someone who can walk away from a powerful position. I don't see that as being a quitter (unlike most of the talking heads), I see that as someone who has principles. The fact that all of the establishment (D and R) is against this move tells me that it was the correct decision. I suspect many of our founding fathers would agree. See the 3rd Principle in The 5000 Year Leap.

14 posted on 07/07/2009 7:16:08 AM PDT by thecabal (Hey Obama, when you gonna start sharin' the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

The swearing in of Al Franken as a US Senator surely calls in to question any “experience” factor of being in public service.


15 posted on 07/07/2009 7:16:54 AM PDT by Neverforget01 (Talk is cheap...except when Congress does it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Certainly, many politicians in Wash DC have quite condescending perceptions of citizens, but Grassley is not one of them. Sen. Grassley is one of the few good guys and a role model for politicians. 99 more of him and the nation’s governance would be in very good hands.


16 posted on 07/07/2009 7:38:59 AM PDT by iacovatx (If you must lie to recruit to your cause, you are fighting for the wrong side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Exactly. The elitist are so out of touch that someone who does not fit their mold is out of the picture to them. I hope they get a rude surprise in 18 months.
17 posted on 07/07/2009 7:41:25 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Being Governor of Alaska was good executive experience, but 4 years would be better than 2.

As a point of reference, she already served through 3 of 4 legislative terms; leaving her hand-picked successor a full legislative session to have under his belt for his own election campaign.

18 posted on 07/07/2009 7:43:21 AM PDT by kevkrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Now that Palin is not an elected official, the Republicans in power have no way to influence or control her through political means.


19 posted on 07/07/2009 7:45:28 AM PDT by TheThinker (America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Two points:

First, I agree wholeheartedly with the thesis of the article. Just a few days ago, I heard (for the umpteenth time) from a liberal co-worker that BHO was qualified for President because he attended Harvard. I have met and talked with Harvard, Yale, and Princeton graduates holding BA, Master’s, and Ph.D. degrees (I hold a Ph.D. of my own) — trust me, they are nothing to write home about. Some of them were dumber than a sack of bricks when it involved any topic outside their chosen area of study. That level of ignorance, however, was more than offset by their degree of arrogance.

That is one of the reasons that I voted for Sarah. The Presidency is not, nor should it be, the province of some self-selected elite. We are not living in Plato’s Republic, wherein a power-hungry, “golden” caste inherits for itself the right to rule over all.

The second point is this: Palin’s resignation has its closest parallel in the acts of Cincinnatus. And that, by itself, recommends her to the highest Office in the land. It harkens back to the acts of George Washington, who refused to continue in office beyond the time deemed appropriate. Palin has my admiration and respect, and this latest action on her part merely cements my opinion of her.


20 posted on 07/07/2009 8:34:13 AM PDT by ForeignDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson