Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Papal Message Seeks "Global Authority" for Economy
Reuters ^ | July 7, 2009 | Phillip Pullella

Posted on 07/07/2009 10:30:02 AM PDT by TheRiverNile

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Benedict called on Tuesday for a "world political authority" to manage the global economy and for more government regulation of national economies to pull the world out of the current crisis and avoid a repeat.

The pope made his call for a re-think of the way the world economy is run in a new encyclical which touched on a number of social issues but whose main connecting thread was how the current crisis has affected both rich and poor nations.

Parts of the encyclical, titled "Charity in Truth," seemed bound to upset free marketeers because of its underlying rejection of unbridled capitalism and unregulated market forces, which he said had led to "thoroughly destructive" abuse of the system.

The pope said every economic decision had a moral consequence and called for "forms of redistribution" of wealth overseen by governments to help those most affected by crises.

Benedict said "there is an urgent need of a true world political authority" whose task would be "to manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result."

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antichrist; catholicism; communism; dictatorship; globalism; hitler; ifitwalkslikeaduck; ihearquacking; lenin; marx; nwo; obama; obamaism; obamaist; oneworldgovernment; pope; socialism; socialistagenda; spartansixdelta; stalin; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 801-811 next last
To: vladimir998
The Catholic Church was established by Christ.

That's funny, I heard Him say, "my Church." Can you show me where He said "Roman Catholic Church"? While you're busy curing my confusion, perhaps you can tell me why it was James who issued the ruling on the Apostolic Decree, and not Peter? Then tell me how the Apostolic Decree prohibited drinking blood while allowing that "transubstantiation" thingy.

If you folks want to wallow in ignorance of your Jewish Messiah following one man go for it. I'd rather follow The Man, thank you.

141 posted on 07/07/2009 11:55:03 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Indolence is the enemy of a republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Have you seen this?


142 posted on 07/07/2009 11:55:37 AM PDT by fortunecookie (Please pray for Anna, age 7, who waits for a new kidney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRiverNile
The Pope's own words from the Encyclical Letter:

67. In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is a strongly felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth. One also senses the urgent need to find innovative ways of implementing the principle of the responsibility to protect[146] and of giving poorer nations an effective voice in shared decision-making. This seems necessary in order to arrive at a political, juridical and economic order which can increase and give direction to international cooperation for the development of all peoples in solidarity. To manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a true world political authority, as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated some years ago. Such an authority would need to be regulated by law, to observe consistently the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity, to seek to establish the common good[147], and to make a commitment to securing authentic integral human development inspired by the values of charity in truth. Furthermore, such an authority would need to be universally recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice, and respect for rights[148]. Obviously it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international forums. Without this, despite the great progress accomplished in various sectors, international law would risk being conditioned by the balance of power among the strongest nations. The integral development of peoples and international cooperation require the establishment of a greater degree of international ordering, marked by subsidiarity, for the management of globalization[149]. They also require the construction of a social order that at last conforms to the moral order, to the interconnection between moral and social spheres, and to the link between politics and the economic and civil spheres, as envisaged by the Charter of the United Nations.

The Vatican's Link For This Letter

143 posted on 07/07/2009 11:58:35 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Columbo

I believe strongly in helping the poor (although I believe that it is the job of the individual and the church and not to be done with the force of law).

In any case, I can understand his desire to help the poor.

What I can’t understand is him calling for a global economic authority. It is the prerequisite for one of the best-known and feared prophecies in all of the Bible.


144 posted on 07/07/2009 11:58:59 AM PDT by TheRiverNile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Yeah, the Pope is a Commie Lib.


145 posted on 07/07/2009 11:59:55 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Apparently, that has been superseded by this new document.

You see, it was just the implementation that was the problem. The pope has just given us the new recipe.

See his prescription in post #143.


146 posted on 07/07/2009 12:01:32 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
One world government with the Antichrist as the political and ultimately the religious leader of the world. Don't worry pope, he will solve the money mess for you. People will just have to get this "little mark" on their forehead or on the back of their hand, no problemo.

The pope calls for one world government in control of the economy! I guess he does not read his Bible! The woman rides the beast!

Man is God ever setting the stage for the return of His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. World economies in shambles, Verichip i.e., the "digital angel" is going full bore in their program to chip the masses for "security" and for "protection of their identity". Also... no cash or credit cards to get lost or stolen... and now the pope calls for a one world government to control the monetary system to clean up the mess and to do it all... how concenient!

God has told us all how it all works out in the end. He has a plan and nothing in heaven or on earth will thwart it.

147 posted on 07/07/2009 12:04:45 PM PDT by Jmouse007 (tot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheRiverNile

another precursor to the end times.


148 posted on 07/07/2009 12:04:51 PM PDT by BlackjackPershing (?The patriot's blood is the seed of Freedom's tree? - Thomas Campbell (Scottish poet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Well, in the interests of transparency and intellectual honesty, I must say that I found this section interesting. This also may be the source of the consternation of some here on FR:

42. Sometimes globalization is viewed in fatalistic terms, as if the dynamics involved were the product of anonymous impersonal forces or structures independent of the human will[102]. In this regard it is useful to remember that while globalization should certainly be understood as a socio-economic process, this is not its only dimension. Underneath the more visible process, humanity itself is becoming increasingly interconnected; it is made up of individuals and peoples to whom this process should offer benefits and development[103], as they assume their respective responsibilities, singly and collectively. The breaking-down of borders is not simply a material fact: it is also a cultural event both in its causes and its effects. If globalization is viewed from a deterministic standpoint, the criteria with which to evaluate and direct it are lost. As a human reality, it is the product of diverse cultural tendencies, which need to be subjected to a process of discernment. The truth of globalization as a process and its fundamental ethical criterion are given by the unity of the human family and its development towards what is good. Hence a sustained commitment is needed so as to promote a person-based and community-oriented cultural process of world-wide integration that is open to transcendence.

Despite some of its structural elements, which should neither be denied nor exaggerated, “globalization, a priori, is neither good nor bad. It will be what people make of it”[104]. We should not be its victims, but rather its protagonists, acting in the light of reason, guided by charity and truth. Blind opposition would be a mistaken and prejudiced attitude, incapable of recognizing the positive aspects of the process, with the consequent risk of missing the chance to take advantage of its many opportunities for development. The processes of globalization, suitably understood and directed, open up the unprecedented possibility of large-scale redistribution of wealth on a world-wide scale; if badly directed, however, they can lead to an increase in poverty and inequality, and could even trigger a global crisis. It is necessary to correct the malfunctions, some of them serious, that cause new divisions between peoples and within peoples, and also to ensure that the redistribution of wealth does not come about through the redistribution or increase of poverty: a real danger if the present situation were to be badly managed. For a long time it was thought that poor peoples should remain at a fixed stage of development, and should be content to receive assistance from the philanthropy of developed peoples. Paul VI strongly opposed this mentality in Populorum Progressio. Today the material resources available for rescuing these peoples from poverty are potentially greater than before, but they have ended up largely in the hands of people from developed countries, who have benefited more from the liberalization that has occurred in the mobility of capital and labour. The world-wide diffusion of forms of prosperity should not therefore be held up by projects that are self-centred, protectionist or at the service of private interests. Indeed the involvement of emerging or developing countries allows us to manage the crisis better today. The transition inherent in the process of globalization presents great difficulties and dangers that can only be overcome if we are able to appropriate the underlying anthropological and ethical spirit that drives globalization towards the humanizing goal of solidarity. Unfortunately this spirit is often overwhelmed or suppressed by ethical and cultural considerations of an individualistic and utilitarian nature. Globalization is a multifaceted and complex phenomenon which must be grasped in the diversity and unity of all its different dimensions, including the theological dimension. In this way it will be possible to experience and to steer the globalization of humanity in relational terms, in terms of communion and the sharing of goods.

This seems to be reflective of the general theme of the letter. The reality of Christ must impact every aspect of what we do, or else, not only are we not truly living Christianity, but also, we aren't being fully charitable. Thus, I believe what the Holy Father is saying is, that if everyone were to walk in imitation of Christ, then the type of globalization that would occur would naturally be beneficial for everyone.

Also, what he appears to be saying is something to the effect of, "Like it or not, but globalization is going to happen".

I may get castigated for this, but quite frankly, I would agree with that sentiment. It's up to us, as Christians, to ensure that the type of globalization that does occur is a Christian one. At least as "Christian" as imperfect humans can make.

If we refuse to accept this reality of our changing world, then the type of globalization that will occur will be the type Benedict describes here, "if [globalization is] badly directed, however, they can lead to an increase in poverty and inequality, and could even trigger a global crisis."

IOW, the type of "redistribution of wealth" he talks about here is a purely voluntary one, one motivated by imitation of Christ, that is, by "charity".

The more I read this letter, the more I do not see a proposal for some kind of "one world government". It's remarkable to me that some do. The only time something remotely like that is mentioned is in paragraph 39, but simply reading the "offending" phrase in context makes it clear the Holy Father isn't calling for some kind of state-enforced socialism or communism: "[it was proposed during the Industrial Revolution that] the civil order, for its self-regulation, also needed intervention from the State for purposes of redistribution. Not only is this vision threatened today by the way in which markets and societies are opening up, but it is evidently insufficient to satisfy the demands of a fully humane economy.

That paragraph was posted on another thread allegedly to support the idea that the Pope was calling for a "one world government", when it's clear, or it should be, from the context (bolded and underlined) that that is the exact opposite of what the Holy Father is saying.

After reading as far as I have, I think I should retract my previous statement on this thread, in somuch as to say, "This encyclical has nothing to do with proposing a specific economic system. It is merely attempting to remind us all of where our true destiny lies (in Christ), and that in such a realization, a truely beneficial transformation of society can begin."

I wouldn't be surprised though if the words "globalization", and "redistribution of wealth" used in this letter cause a knee jerk, almost instinctive reaction in some, which is a shame. It truly isn't "poor in spirit" to act in such a way, this much is certain.

149 posted on 07/07/2009 12:05:31 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
And how well is that serving the poor by the way? How harshl do you think Jesus will judge this rich world for having so many poor and hungry people? I’m just asking.

The Costa Rican President just gave a speech where he said it is time to quit blaming others for the failures of third world countries. He said South America had universities before North America. He said they were once ahead of Mexico, South Korea,and China economically. He said they are so concerned about "isms"; is it better to have capitalism, socialism, communism, etc.

What they need to do is start educating their people, building their infrastructure, clean up their own governments and quit complaining that the United States has more than they do. In 1750 the USA was just as poor as they were.

150 posted on 07/07/2009 12:05:44 PM PDT by oldbrowser (This is not an administration, it's a crime syndicate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: TheRiverNile

I am catholic and I think the pope should be more worried about saving souls of the earth and not the money........you cannot have 2 masters...


151 posted on 07/07/2009 12:10:44 PM PDT by angelcindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets
How about the 12th Mahdi?Just to clarify it is Al-Mahdi (who will be named Muhammed bin Abdullah). It is the 12th imam (descendant of Muhammed who is in hiding/resting until he is revealed). Most assume both to be the same person.
152 posted on 07/07/2009 12:13:24 PM PDT by LivingNet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

Post #143 highlights why you are wrong in your interpretation.

The pope seeks a world authority that has the teeth to enforce among the nations what he is proposing. There is no doubt, that is, if you trust the pope’s own words, straight from the Vatican.


153 posted on 07/07/2009 12:13:24 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Thought you’d be interested in seeing this.


154 posted on 07/07/2009 12:14:11 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRiverNile
Anybody care to explain?

The article is al-Reuters.

Anybody who takes it at face value is acting very foolishly.

You wouldn't trust them if it weren't about the Pope, would you? Why trust them now?

155 posted on 07/07/2009 12:15:13 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

He’s a great moral leader; he’s a great economic illiterate.

Well said. Just like every priest I have ever met, except one.


156 posted on 07/07/2009 12:15:41 PM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Vlad, the pope specifically states that there is “urgent need of a true world political authority” and “Furthermore, such an authority would need to be universally recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice, and respect for rights[148]. Obviously it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international forums.”

Vlad, you need to read better. You papal apologists really ought to be able do better.

See post #143 for the Vatican link on the pope's words.

157 posted on 07/07/2009 12:18:00 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Columbo; Pyro7480
Thank you for highlighting that paragraph. I would further refine it to this part:

In order not to produce a dangerous universal power of a tyrannical nature, the governance of globalization must be marked by subsidiarity, articulated into several layers and involving different levels that can work together. Globalization certainly requires authority, insofar as it poses the problem of a global common good that needs to be pursued. This authority, however, must be organized in a subsidiary and stratified way[138], if it is not to infringe upon freedom and if it is to yield effective results in practice."

158 posted on 07/07/2009 12:30:04 PM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
Free emerging societies have given growth to The Catholic Church.

Controlled and Socialist societies have replaced the Church and kicked it out.

Not sure where he is going with this.........

159 posted on 07/07/2009 12:32:49 PM PDT by Patas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Salvation

Do you have comments about this?


160 posted on 07/07/2009 12:33:24 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 801-811 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson