Posted on 07/10/2009 12:37:29 PM PDT by dr_who
"Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say, because I think that like in any political movement there are shades, and there are libertarians who are almost over at the point of wanting no government at all or anarchy. I believe there are legitimate government functions." --Ronald Reagan
Yeah, and that too. Could also be Fishy Republicans, only with a French accent.
Reason is a libertarian mag
And failing miserably. George Will, Peggy Noonan and David Frum are the "right"?
Mainline Republicans see 1960s Marxist-Alinsky street rabble-cum-Rat Party (formerly the traditional, patriotic Democratic Party) attacking a Party member who's not "one of them" and their response?
"Run away! Run away!"
Mainline Republicans don't have the guts to confront the Rat Party's tactics.. or is it something else?
Rockefeller still rules? A generation ago it was the Goldwater supporters outside the Republican mainstream were "purveyors of hate." Now, a slight improvement, we're purveyors of polarization and resentment.
Nelson Rockefeller according to Stuart Spencer (Rockefeller's public relations head) said, "We had to destroy Barry Goldwater as a member of the human race."
We have to destroy Sarah Palin as a member of the human race?
This seems to be the biggest complaint against her. It just doesent seem to me like that would be such a hard thing to do. I just dont get all the animus from "this " side of the aisle.
I thought the baby and communist jabs were self-evident, but the point is taken. Sarcasm tags always, from here on out.
There is retreating and there is maneuvering.
Hunter/DeMint 2012
To your knowledge is Hunter making any preps for the 12 primaries? If so are you free to share any? What is he doing at the present time, consulting, speaking, etc?
cathy young: “Its true that she has been attacked viciously by the Left and by members of her own party in terms I couldn’t repeat in front of my mother. But somehow I can’t resist the urge to pile on. Given the chance to defend her against these irrational and vicious attacks by her and my common enemy I can’t do it. If I speak up for her, they might come after me next.”
The RINOs are still bitter and clinging to a time when there was more of them.
I’m not even going to bother reading it, but yes she is.
Palin 2012.
Palin has a lot of critics on the right, and for a number of reasons.
The one thing the 3 you mention all have in common is a respect for the English language.
What you are doing here, of course, is promoting a logical fallacy — guilt by association — by attempting to discredit all Palin critics on the right by associating them with a few critics you dislike. Of course this is circular logic in the first place, because your reason for disliking them is primarily because of their criticism of Palin.
Perhaps you should start trying to defend Palin’s merits instead?
If you read her biography on Wikipedia, she wanders from campus to campus conducting "gender studies" seminars.
So much for offering "reasoned arguments"...
Take a breath...you’ll need it. Palin is not just a person, she is an idea. One that is lost on the sell out Republicrats.
A feminist that hates Sarah Palin? I’m shocked.
Worse than just a feminist. From the wiki bio: ... gender issues and feminism ... she taught a 3-week gender issues course at Colorado College.
So Cathy's a diesel dyke, deeply depressed and confused about her own gender, patently insane, yet somehow she possesses some mysterious wisdom about what's best for conservative voters, Sarah Palin, and America overall.
You and Andrew Sullivan don't count.
The one thing the 3 you mention all have in common is a respect for the English language.
Is that why they parrot Democrat talking points?
Those were the exact parties named in the Losertarian article. Try reading more slowly.
“Yet these same conservatives have been devout admirers of Ronald Reagan, hardly a product of the Ivy League.”
Hardly an appropriate comparison: they worked for Reagan after he’d proved himself and have become Reagan snobs (no arrows, I’m a complete Reagan fan myself).
Colonel, USAFR
It is becoming abundantly clear that the most vocal criticism of Sarah Palin is originating from the lesbians and gays of both parties, .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.