Skip to comments.Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging prez
Posted on 07/15/2009 5:37:44 AM PDT by buggy02
A U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida scheduled to report for deployment to Afghanistan within days has had his military orders revoked after arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office. His attorney, Orly Taitz, confirmed to WND the military has rescinded his impending deployment orders. "We won! We won before we even arrived," she said with excitement. "It means that the military has nothing to show for Obama. It means that the military has directly responded by saying Obama is illegitimate and they cannot fight it. Therefore, they are revoking the order!" She continued, "They just said, 'Order revoked.' No explanation. No reasons just revoked."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
“> 65 million idiots voted FOR him, the opposing party conceded, 300 million Americans tacitly watched his inauguration, the outgoing POTUS validated him and the Chief Justice of the USSC capped it off with a handshake,... he is POTUS.
The Rule of Law vs The Will of The People was the core issue between Bush and Gore. Rule of Law won.
Why should this situation be any different?”
the Constitution trumps all that, if he is not a natural born citizen then everything he has signed since last January is null and void.
Of course that is just a dream, since every branch of government (except barely the Supreme Court) is owned by the Damocrats we are officially governed by tyranny.
Sam, you said:
“65 million idiots voted FOR him, the opposing party conceded, 300 million Americans tacitly watched his inauguration, the outgoing POTUS validated him and the Chief Justice of the USSC capped it off with a handshake,... he is POTUS.”
No my friend. None of the republic ‘conceding’, none of the votes for him, no law, no nothing validates him as POTUS IF HE WERE NEVER ELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR ANY OFFICE TO BEGIN WITH.
I’m not screaming - just emphasizing. None of the validations or consessions are legitimate if HE was never eligible to BEGIN WITH! All occurences or events are invalid surrounding him before they occur if he was not eligible from the get go.
If you want to be blunt - if Oboy is found to be ineligible for POTUS let alone a US Senator......none of us should have ever called him “President”. He is not and will never be called “President” by me until he proves with several individual pieces of documentation that he was eligible to run for the office.
“I think its admirable. And so do a lot of senior Officers who were talking about it in a bar last night, and toasting to his name.”
Were you personally there to hear them?
I agree with most of what you say, as I have already said but he is Army Reservist.It is in the first paragraph of the posted article.
He has a court date on this tomorrow morning so more will be known then.
What’s the name of the soldier being sent to fight in his place? I prefer to credit the real hero here.
I don’t think he has anything to worry about. He hasn’t missed his unit’s “movement,” because he hired a lawyer to file a motion before he was scheduled to deploy. As a result of his lawyer’s filing, *poof*, his orders had gone away, so he can’t get in trouble for not following an order that no longer exists. I would have said the thing to watch for next would be whether he just gets demobilized, but apparently his lawyer is amending her motion to include the entire unit. I’m sure the Pentagon can do without one of their many Majors, but without the entire unit... well, that may be a different story.
Done with your interest for now? Bash a mans character and run-is more like it.
My thoughts go back a little farther...to when the Watergate burglars all pleaded "guilty" to avoid a trial and what would be disclosed therein. Judge Sirica was not pleased, said as much, threw the book at them and then pushed for the investigations that disclosed the hush money and led to the whole house of cards tumbling.
>I sure wouldnt want him as my commanding officer under the circumstances.
Why not? The oath is to the Constitution, not the President, not the Congress, not the USSC... All three branches have been violating the law, Constitutional or otherwise, in recent months. (GM/Chrysler, for one: The exec. branch made criminal threats and extortion against those willing to support the bondholders; the USSC for allowing the Exec. branch to do so AND refusing to hear the case despite Constitutional guarantees about ‘equal protection under law,’ ‘petition the government for redress,’ and ‘right to jury-trial’; and the Congress... well, any Legislative body that passes a bill unread is criminally negligent, incompetent, or full of traitors.)
Does anybody read the articles posted before commenting anymore?
William Jefferson Clinton was guilty of perjury and of suborning such. Rule Of Law did not win then.
Why should this be any different?
1996: 47,402,357 vs. 39,198,755 - Clinton beats Ken Starr by 8 million
2000: 50,456,002 vs. 50,999,897 - Rule of Law gets a token win
2008: 69,456,897 vs. 59,934,814 - Cult of Personality beats Rule of Law by 10 million
Probably about 6-7 million, I'd guess. That's where will of the people trumps rule of law, unfortunately.
Either way, by your own admission this is clearly now a judicial oligarchy, not a constitutional republic.
You're depending on one tiny branch to respect the Constitution when every other segment of the Republic has ignored it in this case: Electorate, Congress, outgoing POTUS, governors, state legislatures, generals, colonels, ambassadors, past presidents, etc, etc.
I was refering to my situation. As Army Reserve, I am not in the State chain of command - strictly federal.
That was my first reaction to the headline , Then I was puzzled as to why Taitz is thrilled.
Obama isn't showing the BC ever. Maybe a fake one if anything. The real one is probably deep within Iron Mountain by now
Consider that the Obama administration is about to go after “rogue interrogators” who, during the previous administration, followed apparently legal orders to interrogate terrorist suspects.
Now Obama says the orders were illegal, and he’s going after them.
So maybe Cook is concerned that any actions he takes in Afghanistan will, in the view of the next administration, be deemed illegal owing to Obama’s illegal usurpation of the office.
Well said. Bears repeating.
To which I'd add:
This is clearly now a judicial oligarchy, not a constitutional republic.
[We] are depending on one tiny branch to respect the Constitution when every other segment of the Republic has ignored it in this case: Electorate, Congress, outgoing POTUS, governors, state legislatures, generals, colonels, ambassadors, past presidents, etc, etc.
Zero is de facto POTUS and the bar to foreign presidents has been dropped.
In fact, I'd not be surprised if at the end of his term, he doesn't force the issue himself as a final insult to say, "aha! you allowed it, so it is now ok."
At the moment, we still have free speech. But with statements like yours & for the sake of supporting our military, a patriot & a fellow FReeper, I’d like to think you’d understand it when I ask you to consider keeping comments like this one to yourself. Good grief.
I would be concerned about exactly that.
My dh was. And he was one of them.
That said, what’s your point? That I was lying to fellow FReepers? What the heck is going on at FR?
The Republic may have allowed it but the people can still challenge it. Roberts shaking his hand does not mean a thing. Until a case is heard before the courts it is not proven. All the courts have done so far is to stall and declare everyone without standing.
The congress and the states that did not verify are the ones who have dropped the ball.