Posted on 07/31/2009 12:45:39 PM PDT by steve-b
An impossible position, social liberalism requires non fiscally responsible big spending.
Wheelock Whitney’s involvement with Pawlenty has never bothered me.
It’s some of the things that Pawlenty stands for that bothers me!
Pawlenty is a loser!
Go Sarah!
Pawlenty is yet another RINO and the GOP presidential race in 2012 doesn’t need any more, thanks, we’ve got our limit.
Ditto!
Gov “Asleep at the Switch” is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
” I am not interested in Pawlenty. The only decent thing out of Minnesota is Bachmann.”
Well stated. She’s the kind of representative who we need
more of.
Pawlenty couldn’t even get a pub senator elected from this state.
Not that Norm is any prize, but he’s better than Franken
They already did that in the last election with Grandpa Munster running against Obama. And Pawlenty was first in line to endorse him.
Exactly!
I don't see why you can't think abortion should be legal and that homos should be allowed to marry each other (if this is what social liberal means) and not hate taxes and government spending. I'm sure plenty of everyday people feel that way.
However in elected politicians that alignment is unheard of. Those who have claimed it are liars who aren't fiscal conservatives at all. Jesse Ventura for example. "Fiscally conservative, socially liberal" was his friggin motto. And he wanted to hike taxes. Mark Kirk and the twins from Maine are so 'pro-choice' they want taxpayers to fund abortions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.