Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
orlytaitzesq.com ^ | 8/2/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid

Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]

Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.

Barry's Kenyan B.C.??

Special Motion for leave

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; article2section1; awgeez; banglist; barackhusseinobama; barackobama; bc; betrayed; bfrcolbtwawlol; bho; bho44; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; birthplace; ccw; certifigate; citizenship; colb; conman; democratssuck; devilspawn; dreams; dreamscopyright; dreamsfrommyfather; enoughofthiscrap; fauxbama; fraud; greatpretender; hailtothekenyan; hawaii; hoax; honolulu; honoluluflimflam; hopespringseternal; hussein; imom; indonesia; kenya; kenyabelieveit; kenyaman; kenyan; keyes; lgfequalsdailykos; lgfhateschristians; lgfracist; lucyhazfootball; m0mbasa; marxistusurper; mas; muslim; naturalborn; nbc; nothingburger; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obroma; ods; orly; orlytaitz; orlytaitzpatriot; philberg; polarik; potusbogus; prezzot; repository1; rkba; rosemarysbaby; stalinistusurper; suckers; taitz; texasdarlin; thekenyan; thistimeforsure; tinfoilhat; unpresident; usurper; vips; zulu666
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,161-2,1802,181-2,2002,201-2,220 ... 12,101-12,111 next last
To: Mount Athos
Here is a document which references a "Trade Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Poland and the Government of the Republic of Kenya signed on 20th April, 1964"

However, the document is dated March, 1990, and may incorrectly refer to the name of the country in the prior agreement.

Otherwise, this suggests that the name "Republic of Kenya" was in use prior to December, 1964.

2,181 posted on 08/02/2009 11:34:25 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2124 | View Replies]

To: David
My reading of that amendment is that the determination of eligibility is a one shot deal. Once he is determined to be eligible and sworn in as president, he can only be removed by impeachment. Otherwise there would be no need for impeachment and the role of the Senate could simply be cut out by the House of Representatives employing the stratagem of reviewing the matter of eligibility whatever it pleases.

Under this interpretation of the Constitution you would soon have tyranny by the House of Representatives intimidating the president into obedience.the House of Representatives would have the exclusive power of impeachment which is constitutionally only to be shared with the Senate.

I simply do not think that eligibility can be determined more than once by this method. It may be that eligibility can never again be determined by any method. That is, even though someone got to be president by committing fraud, even fraud against the Constitution, he nevertheless committed that fraud before he became president. There is a strong body of constitutional scholarship that says the president can only be impeached for "high crimes and misdemeanors" committed while in office. Otherwise you would have the president being impeached for every misstep throughout his life and an opposition majority could tie a president up for his whole term.

I do not accept this argument but I am sure that the Democrats would make that argument and, like the Clinton impeachment, the idea is to kick up enough dust so that the public loses the thrust. I have outlined Bill Clinton's high crimes and misdemeanors in a previous post but the public saw it as merely a sex peccadillo and they did not wish to endanger their retirement accounts, so public opinion called for his acquittal and the Senate dutifully obliged. I agree with you that it is an anomaly to have a man in the oval office and have no constitutional or legal remedy to uphold the Constitution. That is the great principle and, as against this overwhelming truth, the idea that a high crime and misdemeanor must be committed in office as opposed to a means of getting in to office, must give way in any decent society.

One last caveat, I recall reading some very turgid article, perhaps a Law Review article, on the subject and it is not so simplistic as we are treating it.


2,182 posted on 08/02/2009 11:35:19 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2030 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

As a senator his birthplace didn’t matter, but he had to be a US citizen for 14 years. I want to see his I-9 form.


2,183 posted on 08/02/2009 11:35:26 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2176 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Since it didn’t become a “Republic” until DECEMBER of 1964, and this document is dated FEBRUARY of 1964, I would think that they would still use the term “Dominion” on official paperwork. I think that’s the more reasonable explanation. It seems very unlikely to me that they would have printed up official documents with “Republic” about 11 months prior to the changeover.

Until that matter can be resolved to prove that the Kenyan gov’t did indeed use documents with “Republic” instead of “Dominion” before it officially happened, I would have to take that document as a hoax :-(


2,184 posted on 08/02/2009 11:35:38 AM PDT by xine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1473 | View Replies]

This thread is an insult to my intelligence.

The Republic of Kenya did not exist in February of 1961, let alone August of 1961.

Read up about the Colony of Kenya and the Dominion of Kenya.


2,185 posted on 08/02/2009 11:35:44 AM PDT by Shaniqua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

What Freepers can come up with on the fly never ceases to amaze me!


2,186 posted on 08/02/2009 11:35:50 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1419 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Who cares what the left thinks? When have they ever had anything good to say about us? Sarah Palin is as straight as an arrow yet they bury her in crap on a daily basis.


2,187 posted on 08/02/2009 11:36:07 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2160 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I’ve always thought there are multiple ways to crosscheck things like this. Even Soros and The Ballerina cannot purge the world of ALL incriminating documents of B.O. They can’t destroy the web of information that would confirm or deny this document. The truth doesn’t need to always be looking over its shoulder, double checking everything. At some point, the pieces will all fall into place with regard to Anne’s whereabouts and the real BC. When revealed, they will fit perfectly together. With few exceptions, a person’s true BC is an objective document that has no agenda, and its facts are unassailable. It’s not as though Anne had presidential aspirations for her son, IMO.


2,188 posted on 08/02/2009 11:36:29 AM PDT by 1951Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1802 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

BTTT
sorry for using your post... but have to do it somewhere.. not sure how much longer before I pass out and my head hits the KB >.<


2,189 posted on 08/02/2009 11:36:31 AM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1641 | View Replies]

To: Shaniqua

The document was prepared in Feb, 1964. Please try and keep up.


2,190 posted on 08/02/2009 11:37:19 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2185 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

No, only half that thick because there would be a book A. Also, at least two bc can fit on a page so that cuts it in half again. Still, thick books though more managable but who knows how they number these things in Kenya. I do hope Orly can track this thing down and remembers to check the other 3 births (at least two on front and two on back) listed on the sheet of paper to make sure nothing has been tampered with.

I’m betting London is more respectful of original documents than Hawaii seems to be.


2,191 posted on 08/02/2009 11:37:29 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2034 | View Replies]

To: wkg
It should be easy to determine if the typing was done with a "basket" key typewriter or an IBM Selectric "golf ball" typewriter.

If the latter, it is probably fake, as the IBM Selectric wasn't introduced until 1961, and it is difficult to envision it importation to this hospital in Kenya by 1964. Eventually, it achieved 75% of the US market, and so a forger would probably find a Selectric to use for the fake.

To me, the typed sections appear uniform, and thus likely produced by an electric golf ball typewriter, rather than the uneven result from a manual basket typewriter likely in use in Kenya in February 1964.

2,192 posted on 08/02/2009 11:37:43 AM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2126 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Pelosi just PO’ed the CIA bigtime. Payback?


2,193 posted on 08/02/2009 11:37:46 AM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2142 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
"It appears to me to be a bit light, perhaps, which might be consistent with older manual typewriter."

As I mentioned, I have an Underwood from the 40s/50s and I assure you that you have to almost type with your fists.

It is REALLY hard to easily [and consistently] punch the keys.

Here is a photo of one that is similar to mine. It was first patented in 1927 and superceded in the 50s by a more "portable" version that was *quite* expensive.

When my mom worked for Sinclair Oil in the 60s [yup, I'm old] she was still using a Royal brand model that was just as big and clunky as this.

She was a speed typer even on these things so she could probably have bent steel with her bare hands, if she'd wanted to...:)

2,194 posted on 08/02/2009 11:37:51 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed with Second Sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1278 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Fake document.

Kenya was declared a Republic on December 12 1964 and this fake document shows Republic of Kenya and it was dated February 17 1964 i.e. before Kenya was declared a Republic.

2,195 posted on 08/02/2009 11:37:57 AM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding
Always interesting to find a newbie vehemently refuting this topic the day he/she joins FR....8/2/09
2,196 posted on 08/02/2009 11:38:04 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2171 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
It seems odd that the document number on the top is 47,044 considering that Obama is the 44th president and in 2008 he was 47 years old.
2,197 posted on 08/02/2009 11:38:20 AM PDT by nightlight7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Nasher

True. And if enough grandmas and grandpas start getting the needle, you’re talkin’ overwhelming societal uproar if they think that the one killing them off is a usurper.


2,198 posted on 08/02/2009 11:38:26 AM PDT by 1951Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1807 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

They were on the road to becoming a republic and the government knew it. What else would they have put on their letterhead? “The Transitional Land of Kenya?”

All the other former British colonies became republics and Kenya was in the process of becoming one too.


2,199 posted on 08/02/2009 11:38:57 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2162 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Re Hawaiian newspaper birth announcements:

“Those birth announcements are fraudulent.”

The birth announcements are stating the date on supposedly long-standing multiple microfilms in multiple Hawaiian libraries well before the elections. The director of the Hawaiian State Department of Health has also publicly corroborated the COLB (and hence the date of birth on it) as being accurate.

Take a deep breath for a bit. Too many people are making
money off of promoting conspiracies related to this issue and a lot of well intentioned folks are being manipulated.

I think that Obama was born in Hawaii but there must be something awfully embarrassing on his real birth certificate (and Occidental College Records) that was not immediately recognized until his presidential run was well under way.

All Democrats should demand he release the original BC and move on and be done with this distracting and now very negative issue for the President. However if there is nothing of issue on the long form original birth certificate, then it shows Obama to be a very trite person incapable of competently fathoming the complexities of higher leadership.


2,200 posted on 08/02/2009 11:39:56 AM PDT by 4FreeSpeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1892 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,161-2,1802,181-2,2002,201-2,220 ... 12,101-12,111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson