Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
orlytaitzesq.com ^ | 8/2/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid

Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]

Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.

Barry's Kenyan B.C.??

Special Motion for leave

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; article2section1; awgeez; banglist; barackhusseinobama; barackobama; bc; betrayed; bfrcolbtwawlol; bho; bho44; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; birthplace; ccw; certifigate; citizenship; colb; conman; democratssuck; devilspawn; dreams; dreamscopyright; dreamsfrommyfather; enoughofthiscrap; fauxbama; fraud; greatpretender; hailtothekenyan; hawaii; hoax; honolulu; honoluluflimflam; hopespringseternal; hussein; imom; indonesia; kenya; kenyabelieveit; kenyaman; kenyan; keyes; lgfequalsdailykos; lgfhateschristians; lgfracist; lucyhazfootball; m0mbasa; marxistusurper; mas; muslim; naturalborn; nbc; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obroma; ods; orly; orlytaitz; orlytaitzpatriot; philberg; polarik; potusbogus; prezzot; repository1; rkba; rosemarysbaby; stalinistusurper; suckers; taitz; texasdarlin; thekenyan; thistimeforsure; tinfoilhat; unpresident; usurper; vips; zulu666
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 5,251-5,3005,301-5,3505,351-5,400 ... 11,851-11,852 next last
To: Rex001

Bobby Jindal was a U.S. citizen when he took his first breath: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html


5,301 posted on 08/03/2009 10:01:40 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5271 | View Replies]

To: BP2
It became independent on Oct. 17, 1963 via an agreement between Prime Minister of Kenya Messrs Jomo Kenyatta, and the Prime Minister of Zanzibar M. Shamte nearly TWO months earlier than the rest of Kenya declared independence on Dec. 12, 1963. The Muslims in the ten-mile strip seemingly called themselves the "Republic of Kenya" in 1963, before the rest of the country was officially known by the same name on Dec. 12, 1964:

Excellent research -- thanks. The truth will stand in the end, the lies will fall by the wayside.

5,302 posted on 08/03/2009 10:02:15 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5222 | View Replies]

To: WVNan
"Something don’t jive jibe."

Sorry. Pet peeve.

5,303 posted on 08/03/2009 10:02:21 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3070 | View Replies]

To: Rex001

“They figure that his policies, the policies of the Dems will be their Waterloo. That logic is taking a big risk by ignoring this issue. “

I’ll bet if the fairness doctrine messes with thier income, they’ll jump on the birther bandwagon.

And “taking Obama out on policies” was all we heard during the election. Soooo many told us to ignore it, no big deal, focus on the issues... now we have trillion deficit, possible government control healthcare and cap and trade.

How’s that ‘let’s beat Obama on the issues’ thing going?


5,304 posted on 08/03/2009 10:03:19 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5272 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri
Has come a long way with lots of info since we mentioned pardoning. ;)

NO doubt. Just trying to contemplate the enormity of this if it is ever proved zer0 and his accomplices pulled a fast one is too much to imagine, oy

5,305 posted on 08/03/2009 10:03:47 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Move over NetZero - Obama's in the house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5296 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

How can we? None of them do anything to instill trust in us. Bottom line, once they get elected they no longer care about us, if they ever did. It’s all about how much they can steal for them and their buddies before we can throw them out, and even that is becoming impossible


5,306 posted on 08/03/2009 10:03:56 AM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5295 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

I don’t think blacks will riot if it turns out he’s not a natural born citizen — or even a citizen. I think most would be offended by him, frankly.


5,307 posted on 08/03/2009 10:04:07 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5297 | View Replies]

To: Rex001

We’ll see.
I’m not sure it is real, and I’m pretty sure that nothing could be done even if Obama were shown to be unqualfied for the presidency. I’m afraid our government has degenerated that far.


5,308 posted on 08/03/2009 10:04:07 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5291 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Looks like a raised stamp to me. Bottom left of the certificate.


5,309 posted on 08/03/2009 10:04:42 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5278 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Just like with the natural-born provision, if there is no U.S. statute that mandates enforcement, nothing can be done other than suing, and as we discovered, for that provision, anyone other than a fellow-candidate has no legal standing to sue.


5,310 posted on 08/03/2009 10:05:27 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5298 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

That’s exactly why I favor a multi-pronged attack. Don’t just hit on one thing...hit on all of them.

Attack, attack and attack some more...well, at least that’s what Patton said to do. ;)


5,311 posted on 08/03/2009 10:05:59 AM PDT by PowerPro (2009 - Conservative Revolution Reborn (Go Palin!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5304 | View Replies]

To: Rex001

It’s so friggin maddening that we can’t get a straight answer from anyone.

I would suggest that we diatance ourselves from this sort of thing until it’s proven to be legit.


5,312 posted on 08/03/2009 10:05:59 AM PDT by nikos1121 (praying for -13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5292 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
Obama has a moral duty to clear this up immediately.

Bravo!!

I pray more and more will come to that same conclusion, very soon!

5,313 posted on 08/03/2009 10:06:08 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Move over NetZero - Obama's in the house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5270 | View Replies]

To: Rex001

That’s what Orly’s trying to do in London right now, I think: Find corroboration of the information.


5,314 posted on 08/03/2009 10:07:01 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5292 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

I will go along with the pardon if we can DEPORT his ass!!!


5,315 posted on 08/03/2009 10:07:20 AM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1391 | View Replies]

Comment #5,316 Removed by Moderator

To: Technical Editor

I don’t think blacks will riot if it turns out he’s not a natural born citizen — or even a citizen. I think most would be offended by him, frankly.
_________________
I agree, some are already repulsed by his elitist, extravagant spending. The ones that might riot or commit suicide are the KOS kiddies, progressives, and Marxists.


5,317 posted on 08/03/2009 10:07:58 AM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5307 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Over 5,313 posts!!

I’d say this story has legs!


5,318 posted on 08/03/2009 10:08:03 AM PDT by airborne (Congratulations to the Stanley Cup Champions! PITTSBURGH PENGUINS RULE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5313 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
1. Kenyan official documents did NOT bear the name "REPUBLIC of Kenya" until 1964, if only because the Republic of Kenya was proclaimed in December 1963.

At the bottom of the document, it clearly states that it was produced in February of 1964

I would have expected better analysis from you.

5,319 posted on 08/03/2009 10:08:11 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4121 | View Replies]

Comment #5,320 Removed by Moderator

To: PA Engineer
Depending on the timing, she might not have known that her husband would not contest the divorce and default. Even if she knew who he was in default, she could not know whether he would attempt to reopen either before or after final judgment. If there was a chance that he might intervene in the litigation, she ran the risk that Barack Obama Senior would expose her birth certificate fraud in Hawaii. So, even if Obama's mother had already obtained a fraudulent Hawaii birth certificate for Barack Obama, she may have concluded it was too risky to use in the divorce case.

She was evidently avoiding her husband and the relationship that must've thoroughly broken down by the time of the divorce proceeding and it is likely that she would be insecure about trusting him, not knowing whether he would be offended that Barack's Hawaiian citizenship was being used instead of his Kenyan citizenship. She simply could not rely on his silence.

Alternatively, she might not have secured the fraudulent Hawaiian birth certificate until after the divorce case because she was simply unaware of how easy the procedure might be and only learned from her attorney as another Freeper has suggested.

Of course it is also possible that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and that the Kenyan certificate is a counterfeit. It is also possible that no birth certificate was needed or used in the Hawaii divorce case at all.


5,321 posted on 08/03/2009 10:10:16 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5266 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

Whoa .. that’s very focused on ‘right wing extremists’ and race. Is that the only way you feel they’ll grant Hawaii’s birth certificate records ?


5,322 posted on 08/03/2009 10:10:58 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5300 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

No, the exception clause or the grandfather clause had to be there because the Framers themselves were not natural born citizens. Why? There was no United States when THEY were born. But for those born after the Constitution was ratified, all they had to do was BE born. Yet without the grandfather clause, the country could not have had a president at all — until a child born after the Constitution was ratified had attained the age of 35. Long time without a president for a new country, no? That’s the reason for the grandfather clause. Nobody alive at the ratification of the Constitution (except a baby 2 minutes old) could possibly be president unless the living people in the country were exempted from having been born in the United States. Remember that there WAS no United States when George Washington was born.


5,323 posted on 08/03/2009 10:12:27 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5288 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Yeah, I know. I get sloppy because I don’t hunt down the original post you responded to.


5,324 posted on 08/03/2009 10:13:50 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5282 | View Replies]

To: Rex001

Remember AlGore breaking Federal Election Law getting away with it claiming there was “no governing authority?” If it is real, wanna bet they make the same claim and get away with it?


5,325 posted on 08/03/2009 10:14:33 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5320 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
"Something don’t jive jibe."

Sorry.

Pet peeve.

You mean it's really "jibe turkey"? :)

5,326 posted on 08/03/2009 10:14:34 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Move over NetZero - Obama's in the house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5303 | View Replies]

To: Prince of Space

Ambercrombie is the ONLY one who has ever said anything about their relationship except for two short remarks from her parents. He has never said anything that has been published or recorded about seeing them after the marriage and with the baby.He did speak about seeing the little boy with his grandfather later after Anne returned to the island to go to U of H. There’s a big gap in his memories. Others who have shared their warm memories of O Sr. never mention knowing or seeing Anne and she never appears in any of the photos of O Sr. that have been posted on various FR threads.


5,327 posted on 08/03/2009 10:14:57 AM PDT by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5210 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

If this turns out to be real...imagine the sheer amount of people who would be culpable for this conspiracy! It’s mind boggling...


5,328 posted on 08/03/2009 10:17:15 AM PDT by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voveo

Bingham’s statement does not trump the federal statute or the 14th Amendment. That’s a fact. Bingham’s statement is not the law.

Why can’t you all realize that the nationality law tells you who is a natural born citizen by defining who is a citizen at birth?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html

“The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; ... “


5,329 posted on 08/03/2009 10:17:55 AM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5286 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

It would sure help to clear things up if the marxist released his vault BC that HI claims to possess.


5,330 posted on 08/03/2009 10:18:38 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5321 | View Replies]

To: Peter Horry

Birth - August 4, 1961 - Friday

Date of Registration - August 5, 1961 - Saturday

District Registry Office - August 9, 1961 - Wednesday

So, he’s born the 4th.

Perhaps the 5th was when he was entered in the hospital records.

The 9th would be when he was entered into this supposed Book 44B.

I had a brain freeze (gee at 5000 posts) so it does say it is the District Office of Coast Province, Mombasa, Republic of Kenya. Hmm, now what is and where specifically is this office? Wonder if there is a higher office where this info might also be recorded before it made it’s way to England? Are we still assuming eventually it would be forwarded to Britain depending on Mombasa’s 10 mile/republic/flavor of the week status?


5,331 posted on 08/03/2009 10:19:11 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5172 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Oh crap. Technically, that document is not a birth certificate. It's more like a COLB. I wish she'd gotten the document designation correct when she filed this. Could be trouble.

Rethink that.

It's a beautifully subtle stroke of genius.

If they try blocking it on that basis, they're ALSO doing the SAME thing to the document from Hawaii.

They may grit their teeth but they will NOT checkmate themselves like that!

5,332 posted on 08/03/2009 10:21:03 AM PDT by Don Joe ([expletive deleted])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Apple Blossom
Regarding the divorce, BHO mother, Ann, filed for divorce in Honolulu in January of 1964.

The date of this Kenyan Birth Registration is February 17th, 1964.

This seems to support that Anne Dunham, shortly after filing for divorce, had to submit proof of Obama Sr. as being the father of the child. As such, the British government generated this “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth” to support Anne's divorce proceedings.

Again, how interesting that this “Certified Copy” was generated 1 month after Anne filed for divorce.

5,333 posted on 08/03/2009 10:21:41 AM PDT by motoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4931 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

I agree with you. The news libs want you to think otherwise, but being black doesn’t mean you like being lied too.

You wrote-
“I don’t think blacks will riot if it turns out he’s not a natural born citizen — or even a citizen. I think most would be offended by him, frankly.”


5,334 posted on 08/03/2009 10:22:08 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5307 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor

Your “explanation” is a nonsequitur.


5,335 posted on 08/03/2009 10:23:09 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5323 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Over 5,313 posts!!

I’d say this story has legs!


Yep it does, fueled by a need to believe anything to oust Obama ASAP, with, or even more in this case, without actual prove that is beyond reasonable doubt.

Face the facts folks, this issue is not worth wasting FR bandwidth.


5,336 posted on 08/03/2009 10:24:25 AM PDT by yield 2 the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5318 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
another monumental task that would have to be carried out right beneath the noses of the archivists.

Bond, James Bond.

Que the Goldfinger music.

5,337 posted on 08/03/2009 10:24:25 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5180 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
or even a citizen. I think most would be offended by him, frankly.

It depends on how it is presented to them...If they are told his roots are NOT truly African American --from slavery stock, but from communist stock and that they have been conned and manipulated by those white roots. They may form the provisional lynching committee.

5,338 posted on 08/03/2009 10:25:14 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5307 | View Replies]

Comment #5,339 Removed by Moderator

To: autumnraine
Immigration law specifically dictates that if ONE parent is not a citizen, then the parent that IS a citizen must have lived in the US for at least ten years, five of which over the age of 16. Ann was only 18 and Obama’s father was not a US citizen.

I have heard that before, but my link does not say any of that. Do you have a link and, if so, which is the most current??

5,340 posted on 08/03/2009 10:26:11 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5051 | View Replies]

To: Rex001

We are getting closer to that too!

You wrote-
“He can not be impeached since he is not President. He would be arrested.”


5,341 posted on 08/03/2009 10:26:11 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5320 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

NO, not at all. Be open to what I am doing:

I am trying to build justification for the disclosure provision I cite, based (in all honesty with you) on the efforts of Obama to marginalize the right and paint them a racists and of course ridicule them.

Can you imagine the colossal BACKFIRE that would be if I used his propaganda in order to gain access to his records, citing HIS safety.

Also, notice the last material of support I offer. From the blogs at politico. It’s worse than hate groups—the left are talking about civil war.

Now, if you didn’t read the whole thing, I wrote about my motivation, not that I had to, but because I want to be fair to all sides. Quite honestly, I focus on the inflammatory left throughout. I take blame as an independent for the disclosure, if granted, and just like that—the right is no longer marginalized on this issue. Someone on the left is, me. And I state what drove me clearly. Please read it all.

Also, read it with an open mind and very carefully. I tried to create the perfect opportunity, for all parties, to grant my request and save face.

I hope I was fair. I meant to be—because the left IS MORE responsible for the racism, race-baiting, threats, and hate. I put it on record, although I used the so-called ‘expert opinion’ about the right-wing in my formal request.

I am trying to solve this peacefully. And not ALLOW you guys, take the blame. I made this request. Not you.

But, in all honesty, I did it for all of us.


5,342 posted on 08/03/2009 10:26:34 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5322 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc

The term natural born citizen was first codified in writing in colonial reference books in 1758 in the legal reference book “Law of Nations.”

That legal reference book was used by John Jay, who later went on to become the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Jay had the clause inserted into the Constitution via a letter he wrote to George Washington, the leader of the Constitutional Convention. Jay was considered the outstanding legal scholar of his time and he was the one is responsible for inserting that term into the U. S. Constitution, which was derived from the Law of Nations.

John Jay wrote: “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and reasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

Emmerich de Vattel was a Swiss jurist who attained world preeminence in international law. This was primarily the result of his great foundational work, which he published in 1758. His monumental work — The Law of Nations — applied a theory of natural law to international relations. His scholarly, foundational, and systematic explanation of the Law of Nations was especially influential in the United States.

The Law of Nations was so influential in the United States because his principles of liberty and equality coincided with the ideals expressed in the U. S. Declaration of Independence. In particular, his definitions in terms of Law governing nations regarding citizenship, defense of neutrality, and his rules for commerce between neutral and belligerent states were considered authoritative in the United States.

Many have said that de Vattel’s Law of Nations was THE primary reference and defining book used by the framers of the U. S. Constitution. It is really not possible to overstate the influence of de Vattel’s Law of Nations as the primary reference book in the drafting of the U. S. Constitution. Emmerich de Vattel’s Law of Nations is almost beyond comparison in its value as a defining document regarding U. S. Constitution intent and interpretation. The Law of Nations, or the Principles of Natural Law, published in 1758, is the first, and ONLY, definitive work the Framers of the U. S. Constitution used for the inclusion of the “Natural Born Citizen” phrase. It nails what is meant by the “natural born citizen” phrase of Section 1, Article 2, of the U. S. Constitution.

It is amazing how perfectly, precisely, and explicitly what Emmerich de Vattel, wrote in paragraph 212, of book 1, chapter 19, of The Law of Nations entitled CITIZENS AND NATIONS, applies to the Obama FRAUD. Quite clearly and explicitly it defines why Obama, can NOT possibly be qualified to be the President of the United States. Obama MUST be disqualified from the office of President of the United States according to the U. S. Constitution Section 1 Article 2.

“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society can not exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as a matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. THE COUNTRY OF THE FATHERS IS THEREFORE THAT OF THE CHILDREN.”


5,343 posted on 08/03/2009 10:27:10 AM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1750 | View Replies]

To: PowerPro

Thanks so much for the information PowerPro. Can anyone judge the a guy who is rightfully fearful for his life after the other dead people...

The other dead people: Obama’s homo music director pal in his “church” who as murder and the murdered man who was cooperating with the FBI in the investigation of the passport break in?


5,344 posted on 08/03/2009 10:28:12 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5148 | View Replies]

To: Scanian; All; LucyT
Hey guys, I am sure someone else has mentioned this before? Maybe? Anyway, I was reading the Lolo/Ann divorce to see what day they were born and noticed in the divorce papers that "mother and child are US Citizens while father is Indonesian citizen". I know that Ann was older, but Maya was not born in the US... anywho, I started questioning whether a child born abroad to a dual citizen is an American citizen.

Then I found this original constitutional amendment from 1790, look on the top of the page and it explicitly discusses Natural Born Citizen of a child born 'beyond the sea..."

Photobucket

And the children of citizens of the United States born beyond sea or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as Natural Born Citizens. PROVIDED: That the right of citizenship did not descend to persons WHOSE FATHERS HAVE NEVER BEEN RESIDENT IN THE UNITED STATES.

Now to get a definition of "resident" because Obama Sr was here on a student visa;

http://www.immspec.com/us-student-visas.htm

The U.S. Government permits people who are not American citizens or U.S. green card holders to study in the USA. Any person WHO IS NOT A U.S. RESIDENT can apply to study in America. The person has to obtain a student visa before he or she can start a course of study in the U.S.

Anyone want to reassure me that I'm not crazy and there is something here?

5,345 posted on 08/03/2009 10:28:54 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5283 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank

You are correct in that according to Article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution a person must be a Natural Born U.S. Citizen (NBC) to be eligible for POTUS. A NBC is a person that is born on American soil to parents that are U.S. citizens.

In mathematical terms:

1 (both parents are US citizens) + 1 (born on American soil) = 2 (qualified per the constitution to be POTUS).

For OBAMA we have:

0 (both parents are US citizens) + 1 (born on American soil) = 1 (not qualified for POTUS)....

0 (both parents are US citizens) + 0 (not born on American soil) = 0 (not qualified for POTUS.

Therefore, it does not matter where OBAMA was born. He is not eligible for POTUS because his father OBAMA Sr. was born in Kenya and was a British citizen.


5,346 posted on 08/03/2009 10:29:14 AM PDT by txoilman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5206 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You know, your post is #5330 in an ongoing thread the overwhelming thrust of which is to get to the truth. Yet the Wall Street Journal endorses and reproduces a link to an article that says that conservatives "latch" onto this birth certificate. We have not "latched" onto anything we are subjecting the document to the most rigorous examination within our power.

I defy Wall Street Journal or anyone else to produce a liberal blog that displays even the smallest portion of the intellectual honesty which is thriving here on Free Republic. It is high time that the Wall Street Journal exhibited a degree of intellectual rigor and honesty.


5,347 posted on 08/03/2009 10:29:54 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5330 | View Replies]

To: voveo

Ahh, thank you voveo! I haven’t seen that section and I will file away for future reference.


5,348 posted on 08/03/2009 10:29:55 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5286 | View Replies]

To: Rex001

That’s why Dr. Taitz is heading to London this week.


5,349 posted on 08/03/2009 10:31:13 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5291 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Thanks palmer. The basis of your opposition was not clear to me. You have a ligit. question. Lots of ligit. information in all ways... Which leads me to the conclusion - we don’t know one way or another! Dang! Let’s keep our minds open and see what comes out in the long run.


5,350 posted on 08/03/2009 10:31:42 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5024 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 5,251-5,3005,301-5,3505,351-5,400 ... 11,851-11,852 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson