Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army National Guard Recruiting FEMA Camp Or 'Internment/Resettlement' Specialists
Canada Free Press ^ | August 5, 2009 | staff

Posted on 08/08/2009 6:38:12 AM PDT by kellynla

The Army National Guard is now recruiting individuals to fill job positions described as an internment/resettlement specialist according to job postings on Monster.Com and other employment based Internet sites such as one listed here. In other words, they are recruiting individuals to man facilities that could be used to house political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals that the government doesn’t like. The term “resettlement” indicates that individuals holding this job position could also be responsible for moving people to other locations against their will. It is a documented fact that the U.S. government has numerous facilities at their disposal that could easily be used to house large numbers of people. Combine that, with this new job posting by the Army National Guard, and it seems as if the U.S. government is continuing to prepare for an eventual popular uprising.

Let’s look at some of the evidence we have of the U.S. government’s intentions to establish the infrastructure that could be used to house large numbers of political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals the U.S. government wants locked up.

HR 645 the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act is a proposed bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would authorize FEMA to build no less than six National Emergency Centers throughout the U.S. on closed or open military facilities. These facilities are to be designed to house large numbers of people. Why would emergency centers need to be built on closed or open military facilities unless there was a need to keep people from coming in and out of them?

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; bho44; bhofema; camp; camps; cwiiping; fema; femacamps; internment; nationalguard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-182 last
To: armymarinedad
You need to look elsewhere for black helicopters.

I found it!

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set... We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

-- July 2, 2008; Barack Obama "Ppublic Service" Address"

151 posted on 08/08/2009 4:08:29 PM PDT by Iron Munro (You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: armymarinedad
You need to look elsewhere for black helicopters.

I found it!

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set... We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

-- July 2, 2008; Barack Obama "Ppublic Service" Address"

152 posted on 08/08/2009 4:08:29 PM PDT by Iron Munro (You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

If I knew where he was I’d ask him in a second but this conversation took place in 2005.


153 posted on 08/08/2009 4:08:47 PM PDT by taxtruth (MY GOVERNMENT THINKS I"M IN A MOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Habibi
I so want to play, but I have other things going on today. Now I'm back. I think that those responsible for defending our country from external threats immediately prior to and during World War II made the best decisions they could based on the information they had at the time, and based on the norms of the time. This was not a black and white situation; all was shades of gray, and they were responsible. If they erred, I believe they did so on the side of caution, not spite. And certainly, that was the case with Lincoln.

As I posted above, U.S. intelligence broke the Japanese code early in World War II, and through Japanese telegraph traffic learned that several hundred Japanese aliens and Japanese-Americans living on the West Coast of the U.S. (and in Hawaii monitoring the 7th fleet) were functioning as spies for Imperial Japan. They monitored Naval activities and movements, shipping, and in addition had infiltrated a number of defense plants. Had they been arrested, the secret that we had broken the Japanese code would have been revealed and our intelligence compromised. The Constitution does not required us to surrender to our enemies early in any war. To sum up and make it simple: hundreds of Japanese spies on our West Coast had to be stopped without revealing we had broken the Japanese code. That is why FDR signed the internment order. Had he not done so, there is a halfway decent chance that I, born on the West Coast, would be speaking Japanese today. I recommend you search out the book I mentioned, it provides useful context for thinking about these matters.

154 posted on 08/08/2009 4:13:57 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe
What ever happened to the Tin Foil Hat alert in the title?

Under this administration, no tin foil required.

155 posted on 08/08/2009 4:18:05 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: taxtruth

Thanks!


156 posted on 08/08/2009 4:33:24 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

And who is going to be interred? I suspect they’ll be some dead people on their side long before I am in a camp.


157 posted on 08/08/2009 6:10:36 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: armymarinedad

“Do you really believe the men and women who are currently defending your freedom with their lives are suddenly going to become boot jack fascists? “

Do you really need real-world examples from our own history? Bonus Army, anyone? We have cops who do nasty things and enjoy doing them. Don’t even begin to try to say the military is pure as the wind driven snow.


158 posted on 08/08/2009 6:14:22 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
It is my understanding that this program is to deal with Katrina-like situations where a large number of people need to be evacuated and housed.

Can you cite the source for your "understanding?"

159 posted on 08/08/2009 7:37:05 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“I so want to play, but I have other things going on today.”

Understandable. This media is nice for getting to things when it is convenient.

“all was shades of gray”

The “fog of war” is ever present, no matter what the commanders do to try to improve things.

“To sum up and make it simple: hundreds of Japanese spies on our West Coast had to be stopped without revealing we had broken the Japanese code.”

And thus the conversation comes down to methodologies, rather then philosophies on individual liberties. Would there have been other methods to deal with the situation without shipping them all to the middle of the country? Certainly, but progressives have never been terribly concerned about individual liberty (and still are not). I think you would agree that the methodology was Draconian. Regardless, though FDR and Lincoln took their actions in war time, less scrupulous executives have taken similar egregious steps in peacetime. We find ourselves in times that are equally as perilous, yet there is not a clear declaration of war to mark the path.

There will come a time, when a President will use his power to deny civil rights to even greater numbers within our citizenry for political gain alone. If not the current occupant of the WH, then others in the future. It is incumbent upon those that think about such issues (and I number you among the legion here at FR that are keen to it), to raise hell when it begins. There are signs that it is has begun already, so it is wise to stomp out the first sparks before a conflagration occurs.

I think we are beginning to see the limits to which a significant percentage of the population will tolerate inroads on their liberties. In other societies, this has not ended well. I suspect even the next year could provide some rather extreme examples of government/citizenry conflict. In my former career, I was something of a professional cynic, so my headware has a bit of tin in it. “When the balloon goes up” I will not be terribly surprised at its occurrence. I’m starting to feel the beginnings of a rather itchy feeling. Hopefully, it’s not going to progress, but I fear that it will.

I think it’s about ready to get interesting. Your thoughts?


160 posted on 08/08/2009 8:05:04 PM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
The authorizing legislation is the Patriot Act, as reauthorized. The facility funding is in the FEMA annual appropriation, in DHS appropriations. There is no line item appropriation for the employees mentioned in this add.

Cavallaro, Gina; "Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1"; Army Times, online, Monday Sep 8, 2008

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/EO12656.htm

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:f8HsOhWrw-8J:training.fema.gov/emiweb/edu/docs/crr/Catastrophe%2520Readiness%2520and%2520Response%2520-%2520Session%25208%2520-%2520Mass%2520Relocation.doc+legislation+for+emergency+catastrophe+relocation+resettlement&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache%3AyDVbgZiT1QEJ%3Ancseonline.org%2FNLE%2FCRSreports%2F06Sep%2FRS22235.pdf+legislation+for+emergency+catastrophe+relocation+resettlement&hl=en&gl=us

161 posted on 08/08/2009 8:33:26 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Can you please quote the relevant references to “resettlement,” specifically?
162 posted on 08/08/2009 8:36:18 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“It is interesting that this URL has been blocked by the site owner and all traces of this story have been scrubbed from the net. It was a well known story a few years ago on FR.”

Google “question 46” and you’ll find references. “I feel lucky” will get you there straight away.


163 posted on 08/08/2009 10:36:18 PM PDT by fretzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: fretzer

Interesting. Thanks for the lead.


164 posted on 08/08/2009 11:06:52 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

The troops today are trained in what is a constitutional and legal order; much better than when dugout Doug led troops against the bonus marchers.


165 posted on 08/08/2009 11:56:34 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

Well, I didn’t mention Bonus Marchers, but it’s certainly interesting.

Regarding training, I suppose it has the potential of being beneficial, but is it actually efficacious in the soldier’s decision process? I’ve had training in bomb deactivation and disposal (no kidding). It lasted all of about an hour. Would I say that I’m qualified to go around deactivating bombs and disposing of them?

No!

There is training, and there is TRAINING. Whether your information should reassure me depends, to a great extent on the quality of said training. Since you brought it up, tell me how comfortable you are re. the quality of training on this subject (No, not bomb deactivation and disposal! You know what I mean.).


166 posted on 08/09/2009 12:49:44 AM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Please read the links. I don’t feel like spoon-feeding you this any longer. Shall we agree to disagree? If you want to believe that there is a scheme, going back to the Reagan administration, to round up people who are Obama’s political opponents and put them in concentration camps, that is entirely OK with me.


167 posted on 08/09/2009 5:51:06 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

So you can’t find old references to RESETTLEMENT. If you could, you’d paste it right here, instead of sending me off on goose chases instead. Fine. I’ll take that. Have a nice day.


168 posted on 08/09/2009 5:56:01 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

My thoughts are that we disagree. If you want to believe that there is a scheme, going back to the Reagan administration (Executive Order 12656), to round up people who are political opponents and put them in concentration camps, that is entirely OK with me. If you want to believe the worst of what happened during World War II, and second-guess those who had to make such Morton’s Fork-types of decisions, that’s fine with me, too. I’m am just grateful we won.


169 posted on 08/09/2009 6:04:39 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Good grief. There is an entire division of DHS that deals with this. It is described in Title IV, Chapter 2 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as “The Refugee Resettlement Program.” I am aware of your reluctance to look up and read actual legislation, but that isn’t my problem. We have been “resettling” people in this country since the end of World War II. DHS has its own Contingency Support Project for a possible mass exodus from Mexico, and the contracts were awarded to Haliburton. There is a separate grants program set up to house and resettle refugees from natural catastrophes such as Katrina, under HHS. If you think the government is coming to get you, in order to “resettle” you, so be it.


170 posted on 08/09/2009 6:43:38 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
” If you want to believe that there is a scheme, going back to the Reagan administration (Executive Order 12656), to round up people who are political opponents and put them in concentration camps, that is entirely OK with me.”

Wow. I wasn't aware of that, and I'm not much of a scheme-theme kind of guy. For the most part, I don't think the government is terribly good at “carry-through” on this sort of thing (WWII being a noteworthy exception). Do you think there's scheme afoot, and if so, what? I'm always interested in what others perceive to be happening. Occasionally, such perceptions hit on something, though the success rate is remarkably low (worse than Vegas). That's why this thread piqued my interest.

171 posted on 08/09/2009 8:22:47 AM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950
I'm not sure they are trained in Constitutional law as well as you think.

'Question 46,' Revisited

However, the study did suggest the existence of a sizable pool of military personnel willing to carry out that mission. In that particular group, 79 Marines – a little more than a quarter of those surveyed – replied to Question 46 in the affirmative, a response Cunningham said "showed an alarming ignorance of the Posse Comitatus Act ... and of how to treat an unlawful order."

(snip)

In September 2006, - on the same day the Bush Regime effectively dismantled the habeas corpus guarantee, it inflicted what may be lethal injury to the Posse Comitatus Act as well by providing the president with the means to make the National Guard units of all 50 states into his personal army, to be deployed domestically in any way he sees fit. At least three combat brigades are now assigned to domestic duty as a homeland security force under Northern Command.

Those troops would supposedly be used for the sole purpose of dealing with catastrophic events, such as terrorism involving the use of non-conventional weapons; however, the initial report indicated that these combat veterans, during their domestic deployment, would be equipped and trained to deal with crowd control and other population management tasks. This is why the unit would be outfitted with "non-lethal" weaponry, in addition to the conventional variety.


172 posted on 08/09/2009 8:44:35 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
I’m am just grateful we won.

The ends justify the means.

173 posted on 08/09/2009 8:46:48 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Well, 16 years ago when I retired officers and enlisted were both trained in the laws of war and in what constitutes a lawful order. This is not to say there are not some senior officers who would try to act on an unlawful order; putting their career advancement over the right thing to do but overall today’s military are a lot more aware than in past times. Unlike what the democrat party would like everyone to believe, the average military member is not an ignorant robot followers.


174 posted on 08/09/2009 10:51:06 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

If 0bama wanted to institute martial law, or use military troops in some other way against civilians, which officers do you think would be selected to carry out his orders? Would he pick a General Petraeus type or a Wesley Clark type?


175 posted on 08/09/2009 10:56:38 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Obviously a weasel clark type and there are plenty of those but one or even a couple of general officers will not sway any large unit or part of any of the services to go along with them if the intent is unconstitutional, such as rounding up or firing on citizen dissenters who are not breaking any law.


176 posted on 08/10/2009 8:11:05 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

No, of course not. Not after thoroughly explaining the entire situation and answering all of their questions before deploying them to do anything. As always every last private and lance corporal will have to be fully informed and convinced that the jags have completely approved all the actions they will be asked to perform.


177 posted on 08/10/2009 8:53:40 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I agree with the decision to use the atomic bomb, too.


178 posted on 08/10/2009 3:28:38 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia; Habibi; Travis McGee
Well, now we all know what you're about.

And you know I'm not talking about the atomic bomb.

179 posted on 08/10/2009 4:08:19 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; Quix

http://www.nationalguard.com/careers/mos/description.php?mos_code=31E


180 posted on 08/12/2009 3:48:48 PM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joya; All; Quix

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin527.htm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT
by Pastor Chuck Baldwin

WHY ARE INTERNMENT CAMPS BEING BUILT?

By Chuck Baldwin
August 11, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

EXCEPRT:
‘The Internet is abuzz with news about the construction of internment camps all across America. Of course, “mainstream” media outlets refuse to touch the subject; or if they do, they pooh-pooh the story; they do what Glenn Beck recently did: try to debunk the story as fallacious and impugn people who speak of it as “conspiracy nuts.” The fact that the Becks, Hannitys, Limbaughs, and O’Reillys of the media circus refuse to deal with the construction of large numbers of internment camps does not make them disappear, however.

‘For starters, all anyone need do to begin a serious investigation of the subject of internment camps is Google the phrase “FEMA Camps.” There is more than enough evidence in that search engine alone to keep one busy with some in-depth private investigation of the subject for quite a while. ... ‘


181 posted on 08/12/2009 3:52:00 PM PDT by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

More like “hope and chains”


182 posted on 08/30/2009 7:20:57 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Diversity causes division and resentment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-182 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson