Skip to comments.Is it Racist to Disagree or is it your Obligation?
Posted on 08/30/2009 3:24:11 PM PDT by MosesKnows
Why is a white person considered racist for expressing opposition to President Obama because he is black?
Its not racist, however, to them, psychologically, the fact that he’s losing more and more support among white voters at the same time he proposes things they agree with and benefits them (or at least they feel it would benefit them) makes it seem racist. It’s not that they’re arbitrarily saying its racist knowing its not, its that they truly believe it is racist, despite the fact it isn’t.
They’ve got nothing else.
That’s why it’s “racist”
I don’t disagree with the color of his skin; I disagree with the color of his Commie RED policies and agenda. :)
Because too many white people have voted to euthanize their race.
It has become, defacto, shameful to be white in the U.S.A.
If Blacks that oppose Obama are “uncle toms”
then whites that opposed Bush are?
It is your DUTY to oppose evil no matter what shape or form it takes.
The answer is because you’ll back down if you’re called a racist and a black won’t.
For the same reason that:
The NAACP is not racist, but a NAAWP would be.
The United Negro College Fund is not racist, but a he United Whitey College Fund would be.
It would be racist to give preference to white people when hiring, but not to give preference to black people through affirmative action.
The TV channel BET is not racist, but a channel called WET would be.
It’s racist to use the word “ni**er” if you’re white, but not if you’re black.
A black conservative is an Uncle Tom, but a white liberal is enlightened.
A white person that voted for McCain last year was racist, but a black person voting for Obama wasn’t.
It’s the double standard.
As long as we continue living under the fascist PC Double Standard set up by the libtards, there will be no true advancement toward a “post-racial” society.
The heinous crimes committed in Knoxville that resulted in the first conviction last week unfortunately were not covered by the MSM because it was a horrific black on white crime. If the races had been reversed, it would have been wall to wall coverage. One AP article I read (the only national news org who said anything about the trial) mentioned that “some conservative bloggers and white supremacist groups” were upset with the lack of coverage.
Unfortunately, the first defendant got life without parole and the jury (which by the way was about half black) did not decide to impose the death penalty, although they could have.
Were the racial roles reversed, I have no doubt there’d be riots and violence, but the white families of the victims expressed their “disappointment” with the no death penalty decision.
If you don't accept liberals' definitions of reality - they can't foist lies on you. Or on to us, either.
It's time to stand up to the race baiters - the professional "chip on the shoulder" guys, the "guilt trippers" and the bullshi--ers.
Remember when Jesse, Al and other race-baiters at first said the 0 wasn’t black enough? Your post leads to:
He isn’t too white, he isn’t too black, he’s too RED.
I suspect some folks just wake up in the morning and WANT to be a victim... sadly, it is a way for them to validate their existence...
You have to admit, Obama is about the stupidest man in history to serve as President. It's the dope ~ jellied his brains.
Does that every single time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.