Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD files new complaint in Georgia seeking class action statuse
Federal District Court, Middle District of Georgia ^ | September 4, 2009 | Orly Taitz

Posted on 09/04/2009 11:36:07 AM PDT by Sibre Fan

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, and INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: 10 U.S.C. §938 and Army Regulation 27-10

COUNT I: DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DUE TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTES, ILLEGAL ORDERS, AND LACK OF ADMINISTRATIVE OR LEGAL REMEDY

COUNT II: INJUNCTION AGAINST RETALIATION FOR CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR STATUS

COUNT III: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT: EXECUTIVE ORDERS OF Jan. 21, 2009

COUNT IV: Declaratory Judgment & Permanent Injunction PLAINTIFF SEEKS A FIVE-PART DECLARATORTY JUDGMENT AS WELL AS A PERMANENT INJUNCTION TO PROTECT CONSCIENTIOUS DISOBEDIENCE TO UNLAWFUL ORDERS FROM RETALIATION

COUNT V: AN OFFICER’S RIGHT OR DUTY TO CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT?

COUNT VI: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT---5 U.S.C. §702, AND FEDERAL COMMON LAW apply to the PRESIDENT AS COMMANDER-in-CHIEF

COUNT VI: THE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE PEOPLE; THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION

COUNT VIII: CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ACTIONABLE UNDER 42 U.S.C. §§1983, 1988(a)(a)

(Excerpt) Read more at archive.org ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; connierhodes; naturalborn; obamanoncitizenissue; orlytaitz; rhodes; taitz; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-217 next last
Complaint is 47 pages long, so I just included the headers.
1 posted on 09/04/2009 11:36:09 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan


2 posted on 09/04/2009 11:39:13 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan
Maybe you can type
something about what the hell
this thread is about?

3 posted on 09/04/2009 11:39:39 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

My guess is that it is a legal case by a soldier asking for “clarification” on the CIC’s authenticity.


4 posted on 09/04/2009 11:42:31 AM PDT by Voter62vb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

Could you make it a smaller size and/or not all caps, please?


5 posted on 09/04/2009 11:43:42 AM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

I thought a military lady doctor filed a case in Texas courts? A class action suit with thousands of active duty John & Jane Doe soldiers is what is needed.

They also need an experienced attorney running the case - not Orly. She is a good lady but they need a attorney with trial experience.


6 posted on 09/04/2009 11:45:11 AM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

I thought a military lady doctor filed a case in Texas courts? A class action suit with thousands of active duty John & Jane Doe soldiers is what is needed.

They also need an experienced attorney running the case - not Orly. She is a good lady but they need a attorney with trial experience.


7 posted on 09/04/2009 11:45:16 AM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

My apologies as I assumed it was clear from the headers to the complaint and from the link.

Context: Last week, Dr. Orly Taitz filed a TRO Motion in Texas on behalf of Captain Connie Rhodes, M.D. F.S., seeking a TRO preventing her deployment to Iraq pending a decision on whether Obama is qualified to be president. That case was discussed @ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2327189/posts. (The TX judge denied the TRO.)

This story: Now, Taitz has filed a new case on Rhodes’ behalf in Georgia, making essentially the same claims, but seeking class action status (on behalf of all military members who have been or will be deployed outside the US on or after January 21, 2009.

The case is before Judge Land. Judge Land is the judge who denied Taitz’s motion for a similar TRO filed on behalf of Maj. Stefan Cook last month.


8 posted on 09/04/2009 11:45:57 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

A military Captain is asking for BHO to be proven a citizen. Basically she is seeking an injunction for her to disobey orders from a fraudulent CIC and she is seeking it to be certified as a class action to cover all active military personnel.


9 posted on 09/04/2009 11:46:15 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Voter62vb

Who will be fully known is CSIC. As far as I am conerned. Just my opinion.


10 posted on 09/04/2009 11:46:49 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
It's about a damned coward refusing to obey lawful orders.

She is no different than any other war resistor. They all think they have "good arguments."

I've dealt with lawyers like this before. They're incompetent, and all they end up with is a client in jail.

11 posted on 09/04/2009 11:46:50 AM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe; Kolokotronis
Lookie here! Our favorite quack is now trying to get the UCMJ and Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) declared unconstitutional!
12 posted on 09/04/2009 11:49:35 AM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division

I’m failing on my FLA ID. Let me se: stupidhead, sycho (sp), soulless....


13 posted on 09/04/2009 11:49:49 AM PDT by Voter62vb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jude24
You just joined Free. Are you working out of the White House?
14 posted on 09/04/2009 11:50:12 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oneamericanvoice

Headers are always in ALL CAPS.


15 posted on 09/04/2009 11:50:27 AM PDT by Concho (Tell all parents to keep their children home from school on Sept 8.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

This ain’t activism.


16 posted on 09/04/2009 11:50:37 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mickie

I’ve been here 9 years, buddy.


17 posted on 09/04/2009 11:51:42 AM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Much ado about nothing if Orly is invovled........ This was dismissed a few hours after it was filed in Texas. Now she’s [both Orly and the Female Cpt] are moving to the Georgia courts and expanding it to all unnamed military. You ever wonder how much these people cost the tax payers with this kinda crap?


18 posted on 09/04/2009 11:53:02 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jude24

That’s not the point, its the MONEY...and if they win the fame. But,,,first,,,follow the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


19 posted on 09/04/2009 11:54:07 AM PDT by Concho (Tell all parents to keep their children home from school on Sept 8.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jude24
It's about a damned coward refusing to obey lawful orders.

This is about a coward who cannot show the public his birth certificate!

20 posted on 09/04/2009 11:54:27 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jude24

You have a problem w/the military protecting the USA from enemies outside the USA and within?


21 posted on 09/04/2009 11:55:27 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
You have a problem w/the military protecting the USA from enemies outside the USA and within?

I'm active duty. I have a problem with people violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

22 posted on 09/04/2009 11:57:45 AM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Voter62vb

Ya you got it


23 posted on 09/04/2009 11:58:45 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Voter62vb

Ya you got it


24 posted on 09/04/2009 11:58:46 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jude24

I have a problem with anyone with a disregard for The Constitution.


25 posted on 09/04/2009 12:00:31 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: missnry
This is about a coward who cannot show the public his birth certificate!

1. The State of Hawaii has authenticated his Certificate of Live Birth. That is game, set, match. Don't feed me the "he won't show the long form version" bullcrap. Not buying. Certified copies of State records are presumptively authentic in all courts of law.

2. Even assuming that Pres. Obama was illegitimate - that doesn't make the orders for her to deploy illegal. SecDef Gates, and other personnel confirmed by Congress - NOT the President - cut her orders. They are legal.

26 posted on 09/04/2009 12:02:28 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

And I have a problem with promoting sedition and mutiny in the ranks.


27 posted on 09/04/2009 12:03:16 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Concho

For legal documents, yes, but for here, they don’t have to be. Nor do they have to be in a large size. It’s easier to read.

Why did you feel the need to capitalize in your post?


28 posted on 09/04/2009 12:05:50 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: deport

They “cost” a lot less than the ineligible usurper failing to provide ANY documentation to the AMERICAN citizens.

So far the tab is up to about $3 to 4 TRILLION the Kenyan has spent. Maybe the judiciary should do it’s job.


29 posted on 09/04/2009 12:06:57 PM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jude24

This captain, like Major Cook, have a question that begs tehm to violate their conscience-and you have a problem with that?

While I do not know this offcier’s history, she , like Cook, probably have served in harm’s way already, but now, under the question of lawful command authority (CIC) they must ask teh question.

Mindless they are not, patriotic, they are.

You swore an oath to the defend the constitution the same as they have.

Why do you think they are “war resisters”? Are they not in uniform, have they not (at least Cook -on the record) have indicated they have no problem prosecuting the defense of this country (and have), but they want to know for certain that they are doing so lawfully under this administration.

Thanks for your service.


30 posted on 09/04/2009 12:07:31 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret) "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Sure you are active duty. An Islamic usurper took control of “your” country. Now you have American boys dying in Islamic countries with a phony islamic CIC.

I would bet intel from the Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood moles in the white hut is getting back to the Taliban and Al Qeada.


31 posted on 09/04/2009 12:10:07 PM PDT by Frantzie (Lou Dobbs & Glenn Beck- American Heroes! Bill O'Reilly = Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jude24
2. Even assuming that Pres. Obama was illegitimate - that doesn't make the orders for her to deploy illegal. SecDef Gates, and other personnel confirmed by Congress - NOT the President - cut her orders. They are legal.

They are acting under orders and the authority of the President who is the Commander In Chief in times of war. They issue orders by dir.

The crux of the issue is that if the CIC is not legally authorized to be CIC, then all subsequent actions are illegal. This is not sedition, nor is it mutiny. There are simply too many questions that the man refuses to answer that are questioning his legitimacy.

32 posted on 09/04/2009 12:11:14 PM PDT by rjsimmon (1-20-2013 The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Manly Warrior
This captain, like Major Cook, have a question that begs tehm to violate their conscience-and you have a problem with that?

So did this guy. And this guy.

While I do not know this offcier’s history, she , like Cook, probably have served in harm’s way already, but now, under the question of lawful command authority (CIC) they must ask teh question.

That's not what they're doing. They're suing to avoid going to Afghanistan or Iraq because they lost an election.

Why do you think they are “war resisters”? Are they not in uniform, have they not (at least Cook -on the record) have indicated they have no problem prosecuting the defense of this country (and have), but they want to know for certain that they are doing so lawfully under this administration.

They're no different than the war resistors that said Iraq and Afghanistan were illegal because they weren't authorized by the UN.

33 posted on 09/04/2009 12:12:28 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

BUMP. A class action by Military members and vets would be excellent news


34 posted on 09/04/2009 12:12:44 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24

How those Obama kneepads fitting? Comfortable?


35 posted on 09/04/2009 12:14:05 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
The crux of the issue is that if the CIC is not legally authorized to be CIC, then all subsequent actions are illegal.

First of all, even assuming the underlying assumption of your argument, that is not true. President Obama, even if he were technically unqualified, still holds apparent authority - and Congress, by seating him, has ratified his apparent authority with actual authority.

This is first year law school stuff.

36 posted on 09/04/2009 12:14:15 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: deport

Not nearly as much as Obama not releasing his birth certificate


37 posted on 09/04/2009 12:15:17 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jude24

What violation? She’s demanding proof of the CIC’s credentials to legally give orders.


38 posted on 09/04/2009 12:16:19 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant
How those Obama kneepads fitting? Comfortable?

Ooooo... original.

39 posted on 09/04/2009 12:16:22 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pissant
What violation? She’s demanding proof of the CIC’s credentials to legally give orders.

That's called insubordination. That's a crime under the UCMJ.

40 posted on 09/04/2009 12:16:53 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jude24
The State of Hawaii has authenticated his Certificate of Live Birth.

Bullsh*t

41 posted on 09/04/2009 12:17:08 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

this is the same dame. Her case was denied in Texas the day it was filed. She’s filing in GA now because it has jurisdiction over her case at the present time.


42 posted on 09/04/2009 12:17:59 PM PDT by humble and shy (Taking our country back, one politician at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Show me where in the UCMJ it prohibits soldiers from civil lawsuits?


43 posted on 09/04/2009 12:18:08 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean it's "bullshit"
44 posted on 09/04/2009 12:19:16 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Article 92, UCMJ.


45 posted on 09/04/2009 12:19:44 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jude24

That’s about “lawful” orders. IF she is correct, then these are unlawful orders. Hence the lawsuit. Could be settled for $12.


46 posted on 09/04/2009 12:21:31 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jude24

I know exactly what Hawaii said and did not say. You apparently are clueless.


47 posted on 09/04/2009 12:22:17 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: pissant
If I order a Private to do something, and he says, "Only if you show me your birth certificate" (since in order to be a commissioned officer I must be an American Citizen), he's getting charged with insubordination.

Same is true with the President.

48 posted on 09/04/2009 12:22:45 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Nope. Under Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 1005, those are presumptively valid.

You conspiracy theorists are the clueless ones.

49 posted on 09/04/2009 12:24:12 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Except if you are INDEED a liar, like Obama, then it is you who has committed the fraud


50 posted on 09/04/2009 12:25:01 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson