Skip to comments.Try obama for high treason (try holding onto a steel pole in a thunderstorm while you're at it)
Posted on 09/22/2009 6:04:47 AM PDT by stephani310
Generals implore the "president" for more troops. High treason is criminal disloyalty to one's country. Obama: No plans for additional troop increase in Afghanistan: TRY OBAMA FOR HIGH TREASON.
The president has to be a real creep to ignore his general’s advice in the one war he said we must win, knowing he is leaving our troops there to get killed in an unfavorable situation.
If he is fool enough to believe he can manage a war opposite what generals tell him, he is just as bad.
Not sending more troops qualifies for many not-so-good categories, but I don’t believe that treason is one of them.
It’s not his country.........it’s just the country he runs, for the moment.
Welcome to FR. Interesting first post.
Yeah, I’m detecting a strange odor....
There are many reasons to consider Obummer, the Fascist, a traitor to our country. Too many for me to even begin a list.
However, there are legitimate reasons to debate what our future course in Afghanistan should be.
My own opinion is that it would make a great place to test our nuclear weapons.
Rather than lose one soldier, I would make it uninhabitable for humans.
No troops for the “good war” when they will be needed in Honduras.
You are just trying to give FR a black-eye. How much did Obama’s boys pay you to post this to whip up sympathy for Poor Widdle Barry Boy? Or are you just carrying his water for free?
He needs to give the generals the troops they need. But treason is not a word to be thrown around lightly. It’s the Democraps who criminalize each and every decision of their opponents.
Denying the generals the troops they need may be foolish and immoral but hold off on the treason accusations until there’s solid cause for them. The Boy Who Cried Wolf comes to mind.
what say you?
How’d I know you’d be a rookie?
The American people cannot understand the distinction. They think if the president is making decisions, he must be well-intentioned and in their interest. Of course, that thinking did not apply to GWB!
Hitler believed the same thing leading to the utter destruction of the German nation. Cuidado America.
MAKE YOUR TIME!!!
Another one post wonder
Maybe we should just TRY to vote his butt out of power in 2010 and out of office in 2012.
SOMEBODY SET US UP THE BOMB.
Well....To be a traitor does a person have to be a citizen first? At this point Obama is still an undocumented president! :-)
Mods need coffee this AM
The Constitution defines treason. He has not committed treason, only criminal stupidity. And he has a mafia-like organization aiding him.
The new ROE are bad enough. Now this. I don’t know if this is treason, but at the very least, it’s dereliction of duty.
Impeachment and the trial for removal from office upon an impeachment are POLITICAL, and not criminal actions. Obama’s refusal to provide the needed troops, his new orders in re “mirandizing” combatants, in re avoiding usage of necessary force to protect our own troops and forces when there is a possibility of collateral damage —these executive actions do rise to High Misdemeanors. No one should seek to preserve the “honor” of a President at the sake of the lives of Americans.
If you want to retain your posting priviledges, you need to come back and defend your post.
Good point. If he's not even a legal citizen (some folks have suggested this), can betraying the country actually be treason? Maybe "terrorism" would more accurately describe his crime.
I think we’d have to have a small stadium just to hold the guilty.
Would work, for me.
He is the enemy within.
It isn’t treason.
The man is unfit to command and make proper decisions that are for the benefit for our country. Gross incompetence also comes to mind. His single minded agenda is to push us into being a socialist state.
Treason? I don’t think that really fits the bill. Stupidity, yes.
More troops killed overseas, the less are available to fight side by side with the patriots in the next Revolutionary War. Thats zero’s plan. In the meantime, he builds up his civilian army.
It is ok to be against Obama’s policies - and because this is a conservative forum, you are in good company.
But this is not FOX NEWS, the Glenn Beck show or the Savage Nation - yelling out “high treason” at every turn and every step of the way would do nothing but make you lose your own credibility!
Does that make constitutional sense? What court in USA would even entertain a notion like that?
We need to keep our sloganeering intellectually and constitutionally sound or else we would reduce ourselves to nothing more than a heaping high pile of laughing stock!
Stephan may have been confused!
There is a difference between Cable TV and Radio Talk Shows on one hand and a discussion forum on the other.
On the Cable TV or Radio Talk show, shock talk is useful because it generates ratings - the language there is designed to attract ordinary, and perhaps otherwise apathetic, audience - it is a commercial bottom line driven approach!
In a discussion forum, there is no need for such shock talk because the people who are here at the forum are here because they want to express their views and increase their knowledge, understand the issues, be educated and be more informed!
I don’t think suspending or terminating stephan’s posting privileges would be the best solution. That would be like silencing views that may not be mainstream for the forum participants.
just the response that the original post has generated at this forum would be good enough!
Several people have called stephan’s hand on this one.
Impeachment and the trial for removal from office upon an impeachment are POLITICAL, and not criminal actions. Obamas refusal to provide the needed troops, his new orders in re mirandizing combatants, in re avoiding usage of necessary force to protect our own troops and forces when there is a possibility of collateral damage these executive actions do rise to High Misdemeanors. No one should seek to preserve the honor of a President at the sake of the lives of Americans.
The original post didn’t seem kosher coming from someone who just signed up. I didn’t feel the need to give them DU fodder.
Throw away the rear-view mirror!
Can we try you for terminal dimness?
Newbie posts often have the mark of silliness to them.
Yours was so silly I even guessed your sign up date.
I’m also guessing that 310 is your weight in kilograms.
We have friends and family serving in the military and some who are now in Afganistan. Obama is a disaster as Commander and Chief. In my opinion he could not care less about the troops under his command. I believe he would send ten or a hundred thousand to their deaths if he thought it could help promote his agenda.
I think that when it is finally proven that he is not constitutionally qualified to occupy the office that the “constitutional scholar” should be tried for treason. Along with ignoring the advice of his generals... Obama has emboldened our enemies and I have no doubt that he has caused the death and injury of thousands of additional troops already.
Those thousands include the future death and injury to the additional troops that it require to straighten out the mess he is in the process of creating at this time.
I have a dark cloaked cat whispering in my ear that the poster might not come back to do so.
I think it’s basement cat.
still not back to defend its post. I think troll ID is confirmed.