Mark Levin's problem with Glenn Beck ( Beck is correct about mccain )

The Week ^ | September 25th

[David1]

If you don’t think Levin can change minds, listen to this interview he had with big lib and former Obama supporter Stephen A Smith:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=834u4NcyHuU&feature=player_embedded

Please don’t compare Savage to Levin. Levin is a solid conservative. He’s been in the movement since he was a kid. He worked for Reagan to defeat Ford in 1976 and Bush in 1980. He worked in the Reagan Justice Department as Chief of Staff to Ed Meese. Levin has a very sharp mind and that is why I listen to him. I don’t think anyone can deconstruct a leftist argument on radio like he can. Not to take anything away from Rush or the others. I just think Mark is right up there.

[Arizona Carolyn]

This was a good and respectful interview, but then Stephen Smith is a sport commentator and Mark came at him with more respect because of that... I would rather see them all treat their callers with this amount of respect and maybe more hearts and minds would be changed... Smith was right that we don't have a good messenger in the GOP.. we don't...

BTW offtopic, but a friend called Hannity's show after the DC march and they screener said they only wanted to hear from liberals and hung up on him... I've heard this same thing lately on FR... to me that is a turnoff, if all Hannity wants is a fight on the air and not to impart infomation about what is going on in DC... I also have an issue with him always having the same people (Newt, etc.) as guests... JMHO ... anyway, this was a good interview and I'd like to hear more of this and less grousing about other commentators.

[Clint N. Suhks]

So if Beck mentions Sunstein or Alinsky that is ripping off Mark?

No, N&L completely made that up just like he did everything else he posted to me so I quit wasting my time. Mark never said he originated anything about Alinsky or Sunstein if you follow those links to his FR posts or listen to him on his radio show, they are just hysterical manifestations from N&L and others on this thread. No, I only claim what I wrote in my original post and agree with HelloooClareese's post.

I did some research and found the 70 second audio of Mark and the use of his paragraph, which apparently is too difficult for some to hear, and thought you'd be interested in listening. Either you believe Mark can recognize his original work or else he's a liar, being an officer of the court that would be a big no no.

[EnquiringMind]

So your argument for why he wasn’t on Geraldo defending OJ in the 90s is that he’s no fan of Geraldo, and criminal law is not his field? What, no proof?

I distinctly remember him, and am 100% certain - not just 99.9.

[Fudd Fan]

I am 100% certain as well. So I guess that’s all there is.
Have a happy day.