Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney Orly Taitz files motion to withdraw as lawyer for Capt. Connie Rhodes
Columbus Ledger-Enquirer ^ | Sept. 28, 2009 | ALAN RIQUELMY

Posted on 09/28/2009 10:15:01 AM PDT by vikk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-519 next last
To: LorenC

LOL, still trying to frame the issue your twisted obamanoid way I see. How many times must you children be told that taunting, baiting and badgering will not get you any further data than you’ve already been given. Just wait, be patient, the data will come out in a court of law, eventually. Bwahahahaha ... Axelgreasy must not be allowing you to look at his archives. What a shame. Deal with it, obot.


481 posted on 10/01/2009 4:43:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"How many times must you children be told that taunting, baiting and badgering..."

Nobody can hold a candle to you in that department. Judging by your conduct on FR, you must be a joy to your friends.

Just don't forget. People who can make rational arguments, do. People who can't, behave like you. Most people reading your stuff realize this.

482 posted on 10/01/2009 5:08:47 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Jealous of my friendships now you are ...

; )

483 posted on 10/01/2009 5:19:52 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Readers can judge for themselves regarding the fraud of the affrimative action liar-in-chief.


So can judges read legal arguments and briefs for themselves.


484 posted on 10/01/2009 5:27:47 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Indeed! Have you been following Leo Donofrio’s latest enquiry? Very interesting turn of events that.


485 posted on 10/01/2009 5:35:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: LorenC
Read the 'ACTUAL' reply from the State of Hawaii concerning the SEAL. From the State of Hawaii - the SEAL on the Obama COLB is not an actual seal from the State of Hawaii, Department of Health. PERIOD- proof of forgery!
486 posted on 10/01/2009 5:42:01 PM PDT by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: LorenC

here is a detailed breakdown of the FactCheck forgeries.
Including an analysis of the date stamp.

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/292/

They are forgeries, plain and simple.

Forgery #1 – The COLB posted on ‘Fight the Smears’ – No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery. Sandra Ramsey Lines, Ron Polirak, and myself, among others.

Forgery #2 – FactCheck – Two different COLB’s one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL

Forgery #3 – FactCheck – COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.

So how can there be three versions of a document that Hawaii NEVER issued?


487 posted on 10/01/2009 5:43:10 PM PDT by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: LorenC

First, substantiated by who? The two major “experts” who claimed that the COLB was forged both turned out to be lying about their credentials, and were never actually document experts. And after they were exposed as fakes, they promptly disappeared offline and never explained themselves.

Sandra Ramsey Lines is a Forensic Document specialist, no one has dis-credited her. My documentation has been used.

Second, the evidence showing that Obama was born in Hawaii (including the news announcements and the Secretary of State saying “Obama was born in Hawaii”) is already more evidence than I ever got that Bush was born in Connecticut, or that Palin was born in Idaho.

Since when are newspaper announcements - legal documents.
Even Chris [My leg is tingling] Matthews had to admitt that is a falsehood and total BS.

Third, on the flip-side, there’s no substantive evidence showing he was born anywhere other than Hawaii. Jerome Corsi has claimed that he was an affidavit from Obama’s grandmother. That is false. It’s been claimed that two of Obama’s siblings said he was born in Kenya. But no one has ever been able to say where or when they said this. And so on.

Even the Obama STORY about Dr Rodney West, was discredited in a matter of hours. I for one worked on debunking that lie. His ‘blood-relative’ grandmother stated she was there when he was born. The Ambassador to Kenya, even admitted that where he was born is going to be a monument.

Here is the klincher.

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-is-a-foreign-national-and-kenya-knows-it/

Updated working link; http://www.bunge.go.ke/parliament/downloads/Tenth%20Parl%201st%20Session/Hansard/5.11.08A.pdf

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT

Wednesday, 5th November, 2008

The House met at 9.00 a.m.

Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obama’s win in the United States of America (USA), the House is crippled.

Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request! *****[note - “having a Kenyan ruling the USA”!]

The Kenyan Parliment itself has stated so.


488 posted on 10/01/2009 5:43:10 PM PDT by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: LorenC
LorenC, I would just about give up with debating with MHGinTN. The guy has no rational opinions,is consistent with name calling, and never puts up on his claims. I have stopped responding to him, It wasn't even sport anymore.

And since he refers to me without a ping, I'm not pinging him, lol like that will stop him from blasting away at me or anyone else that infringes on his fantasy.

489 posted on 10/01/2009 5:49:26 PM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

Aww, come on, give us one of your racist spittles, bub. Do I need to pull one from FR archives for ya? BTW, joining the liars platoon a little late in worship of your liar-in-chief, aren’tya? ... Orare you part of the next shift? Can we expect WOSG and Non-Sequitur and Michael Michael to now show up? Are they in your platoon or another? Perhaps you can get someone to read the linked sites to you so you can get up to speed on the posted facts your little platoons have failed to refute.


490 posted on 10/01/2009 6:29:23 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob
BTW, skippy, HERE'S the link for your needed update reading since you claim to not know I post substance to a few of you children. Study it, there will be tests. Muahahaha
491 posted on 10/01/2009 6:33:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: syc1959
here is a detailed breakdown of the FactCheck forgeries. Including an analysis of the date stamp.

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/292/

Yes, that's the same link you posted before. And that MHGinTN has posted several times. And like I said before, it doesn't offer any proof at all that there was ever a missing seal on the FTS COLB. You state it as a given conclusion, but you don't give any evidence to support that conclusion.

Forgery #1 – The COLB posted on ‘Fight the Smears’ – No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery. Sandra Ramsey Lines, Ron Polirak, and myself, among others.

See, you state "No Seal," but you don't provide any evidence of that in the piece above this statement. Furthermore, Sandra Lines didn't say it was a forgery. And you're still citing Polarik as authority, even though he turned out to be lying about his credentials for a whole year, and faked at least one piece of his 'evidence.'

Forgery #2 – FactCheck – Two different COLB’s one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL

Forgery #3 – FactCheck – COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.

First, like I said before, a little tweaking in GIMP shows that there are, in fact, signs of a seal there. It's hard to see because of the focus and the shadow, but it's there. And the seal is the only distinction you claim exists between "#2" and "#3".

Second, like I asked before, is it really your contention that Factcheck took eight photographs of "Forgery #2," and then took one photograph of "Forgery #3"? And that in a photography session where they took several photos including the seal, they didn't notice when the document got switched out for one that didn't have a seal at all? And that the Obama campaign would intentionally make a seal-less version and share it with Factcheck for a single photo for no reason, swapping it with the sealed version midway through the photo shoot?

492 posted on 10/01/2009 7:15:45 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: syc1959
Sandra Ramsey Lines is a Forensic Document specialist, no one has dis-credited her.

Sandra Lines didn't claim the COLB was a forgery, though.

My documentation has been used.

Used by who? Orly? Also, everyone who cites your paper online offers only "genealogist" as your expertise. Now I rather enjoy genealogy, but what in your genealogy past gives you experience in digital image examination?

Since when are newspaper announcements - legal documents.

Who asked for legal documents? If that's the standard, I've never seen ANY evidence that Bush or Biden or Palin or Gore or Clinton were born in the U.S., much less in the states they claim. The fact that I've seen Obama's COLB automatically means I've seen more birthplace-evidencing legal documentation for him than any other President prior to or during his Presidency.

His ‘blood-relative’ grandmother stated she was there when he was born.

Sure...if you ignore the multiple times she stated that he was born in Hawaii. Also, fun fact: as early as June 2008, it was claimed that Obama's grandmother had said he was born in Kenya. But nobody ever managed to produce any evidence of that either.

The Ambassador to Kenya, even admitted that where he was born is going to be a monument.

It's a year later; has there been a monument? And if we're to assume that the Ambassador knows the real truth...why would HE know the real truth? One can at least understand why a grandmother might be a trusted source, but why would an Ambassador be a reliable source to know where a U.S. Presidential candidate was born?

Here is the klincher.

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/obama-is-a-foreign-national-and-kenya-knows-it/

Updated working link; http://www.bunge.go.ke/parliament/downloads/Tenth%20Parl%201st%20Session/Hansard/5.11.08A.pdf

So you think Obama managed to keep a Kenyan birth a total secret from everybody in the U.S. for 47 years, until some folks started tossing around unsupported rumors in spring 2008...and yet the Kenyan government 'knows' he was born in Kenya? That his true Kenyan birth was simultaneously an amazingly well-kept secret where he lived for five decades, and yet was public knowledge halfway around the world where he had only visited three times? And that interpretation doesn't strike you as a bit silly?

493 posted on 10/01/2009 7:35:38 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Indeed! Have you been following Leo Donofrio’s latest enquiry? Very interesting turn of events that.


Yes, I have been following ALL of the legal wranglings and I check his naturalborncitizen web site frequently.


494 posted on 10/01/2009 7:47:10 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: LorenC

You have posted the same arguments on other forums, and every time you have lost, left, and tried on other forums.

Face facts, Obama is an illegal undocumented alien.

“You Can Lead an Obot to Evidence but You Can’t Make Him Think,”

There is stupid
Then there is ‘Obama’ stupid

In the face of reality, Obots depend on Ritalin


495 posted on 10/01/2009 8:18:03 PM PDT by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: LorenC

Used by who? Orly? Also, everyone who cites your paper online offers only “genealogist” as your expertise. Now I rather enjoy genealogy, but what in your genealogy past gives you experience in digital image examination?

You’d be surprised at my past and experience. I am the one that posted THE video that shows you how to create the Obama COLB in 5 min.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd9K2Q3EbVQ

So you think Obama managed to keep a Kenyan birth a total secret.

Then why has he failed to release an authentic ‘certified’ Birth Certificate.

Why has BOTH hospitals in Hawaii, denied that he was born there?
Why has NO doctor, witness, or any other person validate that Barack Obama aka Barry Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham was ever born in and UNDER the jurisdiction of the United States.


496 posted on 10/01/2009 8:27:18 PM PDT by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: LorenC

Just to keep you on track;

Here are some interesting quotes concerning ‘JURISDICTION’

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

Now, explain, how a British subject governed by British Law, can be under the Jurisdiction of the United States, as defined that “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance”
So if Barack Obama’s allegiance followed his father, followed his father’s condition, regardless of where he was born. Hawaii, the Washington monument, the Oval Office or anywhere else he [Obama] was born is irrelevant, he is not, can not, nor ever be qualified per the Constitution.


497 posted on 10/01/2009 8:31:51 PM PDT by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: syc1959
You have posted the same arguments on other forums, and every time you have lost, left, and tried on other forums.

I see. Like when I pointed out at WND about how it says at the top of their forum "At least two of his relatives in Kenya claim to have been present at his birth in Mombasa, Kenya," and asked if anybody knew which two, or when/where they made these claims. And nobody could answer.

Or when I pointed out that Joseph Farah had stated more than once that Sarah Obama had stated she was in Mombasa for Obama's birth, and asked if anybody could point to where she said specifically "Mombasa". And nobody could answer.

Or when I tried to get anyone to say whether a child born to two U.S. citizens, but inheriting dual citizenship nonetheless, was a natural born citizen or not. And nobody seemed to be able to answer.

I can't say that I had viewed those as losses, myself.

498 posted on 10/01/2009 9:18:01 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: syc1959
You’d be surprised at my past and experience.

So surprise me.

I am the one that posted THE video that shows you how to create the Obama COLB in 5 min.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd9K2Q3EbVQ

And have you put the final product online for people to see how good your forgery looks up close? There's not really any detail visible in a YouTube window. For instance, you cut-and-pasted that seal; how well does the rattan pattern match around that?

Why has BOTH hospitals in Hawaii, denied that he was born there?

Kapiolani Medical Center has never denied that he was born there.

Why has NO doctor, witness, or any other person validate that Barack Obama aka Barry Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham was ever born in and UNDER the jurisdiction of the United States.

"Any other person"? At least one has: "I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen."

Have you ever heard any other President's birth be publicly validated by a doctor or witness, apart from the President's parents? I haven't. Did you ever ask why none of their births were so validated? Why demand evidence from this President that wasn't demanded of Bush, or Clinton, or Reagan, or Carter, or Ford, etc.? What makes this President different?

499 posted on 10/01/2009 9:28:24 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: syc1959
Now, explain, how a British subject governed by British Law, can be under the Jurisdiction of the United States, as defined that “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance”

That's simple. The U.S. doesn't recognize the second allegiance or the foreign citizenship. As such, a child born with dual citizenships is, in the eyes of the U.S., only a U.S. citizen.

The U.S. looked upon Obama as being a U.S. citizen and having only allegiance to the U.S.; they didn't recognize any foreign allegiance in him, even if the U.K. did. Fortunately, who is and isn't a natural-born American citizen is a function of U.S. law and only U.S. law, and isn't affected by who the United Kingdom or any other country decides to grant citizenship to of their own volition.

500 posted on 10/01/2009 9:36:53 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-519 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson