Mandatory flu vaccination splits workers

http://www.newsday.com ^ | September 27, 2009 | DELTHIA RICKS

[Elsie]

This is a terrible risk for the State to take with the bodies of free people.

What??

There is NO 'risk' to the STATE!!!

[Elsie]

“Just Say NO !”...

“Just Say F**K you!!!"

[EdReform]

Ping

[bamahead]

But some nurses and many other health care providers say the regulation violates their personal freedom and leaves them vulnerable to vaccine injury. And they cite deaths associated with the last federal government swine-flu vaccination program in 1976.



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)

[SaraJohnson]

Are you assuming that if the State orders a vaccine and it turns out to have been damaging to people, they face no consequences (risk) for their action? I beg to differ. People are pretty sick and tired of being sick and tired at this point. Heads on pikes might happen.

[Elsie]

Are you assuming that if the State orders a vaccine and it turns out to have been damaging to people, they face no consequences (risk) for their action?

Yes; I am.

The 'state' will take NO hits.

Oh, there will be someONE thrown under the bus; but the ship of state will sail on - oblivious.

[conservativegranny]

Thank you for the information Holly. I will pass this on to my other family members so they can look into it as well. We still have time to make decisions as the vaccine isn’t available yet here.

Good health to you and your family as well.

[conservativegranny]

Holly this is the response I received from my daughter when I questioned her about the sqaulene.

“The difference is in that the four vaccines that have been APPROVED for use are NOT the same as the vaccines they are using in the clinical trials. The vaccines approved for use in the U.S. do not contain adjuvants or squalene. The vaccines used in the clinical trials do not contain squalene but do contain an adjuvant. Some vaccines approved for use outside of the U.S. do contain one or both. Why they are not using the approved vaccine for the trials I do not understand. If you read the comments in the Dr. Sears link he states repeatedly that there is not squalene in any of the four approved vaccine and won’t address the issue until they approve one that does have it in. The lesson here is...don’t sign up for trials. My lingering worry is that they are lying and that the published ingredients don’t match the real ingredients.”

So I went to look it up myself. The reason we missed that is because it is in the comments section. People specifically asked about the squalene and Dr. Sears answered them there.

http://www.askdrsears.com/thevaccinebook/

Just click on the comments link at the end of the original article.

It does say that the addition of squalene could happen in the future if the need arises for example if the virus mutates.

[HollyB]

Thank you, I appreciate it. Very interesting, I’m glad you posted it. Let your daughter know thank you as well.

[mewzilla]

FWIW and since you mentioned hepatitis....

New Research Study Shows Developmental Delays in Monkeys Given Hepatitis B Vaccines

Link also mentions thimerosol. I thought thimerosol wasn't in flu vaccines?

[Preech1]

Funny, I am working under similar conditions and have been considering looking for a doctor who will do just that. I hear MANY MD’s are refusing the vaccines as well...