Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Targeting Fox News Is a Profound Political Mistake
FoxNews ^ | October 14, 2009 | Doug Schoen

Posted on 10/14/2009 10:35:21 AM PDT by Joiseydude

The White House is making a profound political mistake by targeting Fox News and deliberately deciding to exclude them from interviews and access to the administration. And not only that, they are making a mistake on both a practical and a political level.

Frankly, it just doesn’t make sense.

On a practical level, targeting a news organization only redounds to one’s detriment. I have no doubt that Fox News will not change its coverage, nor should it, in response to statements from White House Communications Director Anita Dunn. Nonetheless, indicating that five separate Fox News programs will not have access to White House personnel simply raises a red flag.

Moreover, it represents a profound political misjudgment. It is a misjudgment to believe that because a network has opinion programs that present a different view from the administration that the network itself and its viewers are unabashedly hostile.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; anitadunn; bho44; bhopress; democrats; foxnews; obama; schoen; waronfox

1 posted on 10/14/2009 10:35:21 AM PDT by Joiseydude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

profound political mistake?

COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY WISHED FOR ANY BETTER!


2 posted on 10/14/2009 10:38:26 AM PDT by Bubba (There's a revolution a-brewing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Go Fox! One honest news source is refreshing.


3 posted on 10/14/2009 10:38:35 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (dimocRATS, the party of taxes and death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
I have no doubt that Fox News will not change its coverage

Maybe that isn't their purpose in this attack. Just maybe they are building a case to shut Fox down along with the Blogs and Talk Radio. I know, progressives would never even suggest such a thing.

4 posted on 10/14/2009 10:46:50 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

FOX needs to find an Obama impersonator and let Beck do comic interviews of him....have HUGE teleprompters for the impersonator and always have them fail halfway through :-)


5 posted on 10/14/2009 10:47:00 AM PDT by Bobalu (I AM JIM THOMPSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

That would be great! Poke fun at Obama at every turn, we know he has extremely thin skin.


6 posted on 10/14/2009 10:49:27 AM PDT by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Fox bump in viewership!


7 posted on 10/14/2009 10:50:51 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

“Maybe that isn’t their purpose in this attack. Just maybe they are building a case to shut Fox down along with the Blogs and Talk Radio.”
....absolutely!....they’re ramping up to impose the Fairness Doctrine....gonna try to put FOX and Rush out of business


8 posted on 10/14/2009 10:51:50 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

I’m looking forward to see what Beck does with the hostage negotiator he’s looking for. He suggested that the white house may want to watch.


9 posted on 10/14/2009 10:53:54 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Its not just Obama with the thin skin, its his supporters too, they can’t stand for their master to be ridiculed....poor babies.


10 posted on 10/14/2009 11:20:37 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (Obamanos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
It is a misjudgment to believe that because a network has opinion programs that present a different view from the administration that the network itself and its viewers are unabashedly hostile.

It's not misjudgment, in fact it is the first proper judgment call they've made.

11 posted on 10/14/2009 11:25:37 AM PDT by Gabz (Not everyone can access online video or audio, please describe it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Hey, great idea!

Then we could quote the dumb things the impersonator said and attribute them to 0bama!

(ref Tina Fey and Sarah Palin)


12 posted on 10/14/2009 11:26:46 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

They have very good reason to desire the shutdown of all dissenting viewpoints and criticism.

Their ideology cannot stand up to a logical argument.
It will fail every time it is challenged.


13 posted on 10/14/2009 11:27:49 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

True, I have been in chat rooms with some of them. It’s quite amusing to poke fun at their “hero”, they go ballistic. They have no sense of humor whatsoever! lol


14 posted on 10/14/2009 11:30:39 AM PDT by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
Well, the author is thinking in terms of the old America. Obama is thinking in terms of the new America. And in that America, attacking Fox is to prepare Obama worshippers to be ready for the steps that will be taken to get Fox and talk radio off the air. Hugo Chavez is still in power, but the media outlets that he attacked are disappearing from the airwaves.

George Bush may have been right not to get in a battle with the NY Times. But that is because he had no intention of shutting them down. He would have to deal with their counter-attacks day after day. Obama doesn't play by those rules, he is a Kenyan dictator, an Odinga. He is freezing the target before he goes after it. When he makes his move, his fascist horde will agree that what Fox does isn't "legitimate" news reporting.

15 posted on 10/14/2009 11:33:58 AM PDT by Defiant (The absence of bias appears to be bias to those who are biased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Hey Anita, suck it!


16 posted on 10/14/2009 11:35:03 AM PDT by devistate one four (Back by popular demand: America love or leave it (GTFOOMC) TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
I think the author misses the point of the attacks on Fox. The White House is trying to taint the pool of public opinion on healthcare. These attacks will subside and they know it's not a good idea long term IMO. But for right now, they want to make Fox News, the only dissenting news source, the issue, and deflect from the actual issue of healthcare. They know Conservatives won't be swayed but they want moderates and Independents to question or at least have doubt about Fox News and its coverage, instead of the healthcare bill.

It's misdirection. Fox needs to make it abundantly clear and pull the rug out from under them.

17 posted on 10/14/2009 11:43:24 AM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
This attempt by one of the three branches of government to confront and silence dissent is indicative of the censorship of ideas which has been carried out by other institutions of the government for decades. As a matter of fact, had the teaching of America's founding ideas not been censored from the textbooks of the nation, such blatant disregard for the First Amendment would not be possible.

On another thread, I posted the following, which relates to this subject as well:

America's founding ideas of liberty were revolutionary in 1776, and they are revolutionary today! They exploded old concepts that some imperfect persons in a society were somehow entitled to make decisions for other likewise imperfect persons. They affirmed the "self-evident" truth that rights are not grants from government, but they are inherent in individuals, Creator-endowed, and, therefore, unalienable.

If today's youth and their parents suddenly were to be exposed to those common sense, "self-evident" truths explained in the writings of the Founders and Framers of our Constitution, they would be aroused to such action that the current Congress and Administration would be stopped in their tracks in their efforts to unconstitutionally "rule" this nation.

The problem is that the "censors" have, over the past several decades, removed those ideas systematically from the nation's textbooks and public discourse, and those who knew better did little to counter their actions.

Now, however, technology has made it possible to access the Founders' writings and to cause them to, once again, explode into the current debate.

Are there enough patriots who will cause this to happen?

Ideas have consequences (Weaver)! In the battle of ideas, the ideas of liberty will defeat the ideas of tyranny, if they are allowed to be read and heard, because they appeal to the innate desire for liberty in each individual.

Of course, the counterfeit ideas of tyranny must be masked in order for politicians to gain the kind of power that has occurred in recent times. To gain that power, such politicians "buy" votes with promises of "goodies" and false solutions to "crises." Once they gain the power, then the tyranny begins.

Hope and change that is acquired in order to gain power over other people's lives is not a revolutionary idea. It is as old as the history of civilization and leads to tyranny.

Where to, America?

18 posted on 10/14/2009 11:48:38 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson