Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inconvenient truth for Al Gore as his North Pole sums don't add up ("fresh figures" yrs old)
Timesonline ^ | December 15, 2009

Posted on 12/14/2009 2:41:42 PM PST by maggief

There are many kinds of truth. Al Gore was poleaxed by an inconvenient one yesterday.

The former US Vice-President, who became an unlikely figurehead for the green movement after narrating the Oscar-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth, became entangled in a new climate change “spin” row.

Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years.

In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference: “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”

However, the climatologist whose work Mr Gore was relying upon dropped the former Vice-President in the water with an icy blast.

“It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at,” Dr Maslowski said. “I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”

Mr Gore’s office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr Maslowksi as a “ballpark figure” several years ago in a conversation with Mr Gore.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algore; climategate; globalwarming; gore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 12/14/2009 2:41:42 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maggief

If Algore’s lips are moving, he’s lying.


2 posted on 12/14/2009 2:43:41 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief; Darnright; Entrepreneur; livius; DollyCali; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; Thunder90; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

3 posted on 12/14/2009 2:43:47 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Liar, liar, pants on fire,
your nose is longer than a telephone wire...


4 posted on 12/14/2009 2:45:11 PM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years.

That may very well be true about the polar ice caps. There's actually no disputing that there's been "Global Warming" over the last many decades. HOWEVER, the dispute is over whether it's "Anthropogenic Global Warming" and that part is not true.

Even Lord Monckton, whom many FReepers quote here, says that he believes that "Global Warming" is a fact and it is happening. He says he does not dispute those who say that Global Warming is happening.

What he disputes is the assertion of "Anthropogenic Global Warming"... :-)

And note that the famed "Northwest Passage" may finally be opening up once again, if the Arctic Ice does finally get out of the way. We'll have the famed "Northwest Passage" to use once again...



Melting ice opens Northwest Passage; Shrinking levels suggest route could become open shipping lane.

Article from: Albany Times Union (Albany, NY) Article date:September 16, 2007 Copyright

Byline: JAMEY KEATEN - Associated Press

PARIS - Arctic ice has shrunk to the lowest level on record, new satellite images show, raising the possibility that the Northwest Passage that eluded famous explorers will become an open shipping lane.

The European Space Agency said nearly 200 satellite photos this month taken together showed an ice-free passage along northern Canada, Alaska and Greenland, and ice retreating to its lowest level since such images were first taken in 1978.

The waters are exposing unexplored resources, and vessels could trim thousands of miles from Europe to Asia by bypassing the Panama Canal. The seasonal ebb and flow of ...



International waters dispute

The Canadian government claims that some of the waters of the Northwest Passage, particularly those in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, are internal to Canada, giving Canada the right to bar transit through these waters. Most maritime nations, including the United States and the nations of the European Union, consider them to be an international strait, where foreign vessels have the right of "transit passage". In such a régime, Canada would have the right to enact fishing and environmental regulation, and fiscal and smuggling laws, as well as laws intended for the safety of shipping, but not the right to close the passage. In 1985, the U.S. icebreaker Polar Sea passed through from Greenland to Alaska, the ship submitted to inspection by the Canadian Coast Guard before passing through. The United States government, when asked by a Canadian reporter, indicated that they did not legally ask permission as they were not required to. The Canadian government issued a declaration in 1986 reaffirming Canadian rights to the waters. However, the United States refused to recognize the Canadian claim. In 1988 the governments of Canada and the U.S. signed an agreement, "Arctic Cooperation", that resolved the practical issue without solving the sovereignty questions. Under the law of the sea, ships engaged in transit passage are not permitted to engage in research. The agreement states that all US Coast Guard vessels are engaged in research, and so would require permission from the Government of Canada to pass through.

In late 2005, it was alleged that U.S. nuclear submarines had travelled unannounced through Canadian Arctic waters, sparking outrage in Canada. In his first news conference after the 2006 federal election, Prime Minister-designate Stephen Harper contested an earlier statement made by the U.S. ambassador that Arctic waters were international, stating the Canadian government's intention to enforce its sovereignty there. The allegations arose after the U.S. Navy released photographs of the USS Charlotte surfaced at the North Pole.

On April 9, 2006, Canada's Joint Task Force North declared that the Canadian military will no longer refer to the region as the Northwest Passage, but as the Canadian Internal Waters.[46] The declaration came after the successful completion of Operation Nunalivut (Inuktitut for "the land is ours"), which was an expedition into the region by five military patrols.

In 2006 a report prepared by the staff of the Parliamentary Information and Research Service of Canada suggested that because of the September 11 attacks the United States might be less interested in pursuing the international waterways claim in the interests of having a more secure North American perimeter. This report was based on an earlier paper, The Northwest Passage Shipping Channel: Is Canada’s Sovereignty Really Floating Away? by Andrea Charron, given to the 2004 Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute Symposium. Later in 2006 former United States Ambassador to Canada, Paul Cellucci agreed with this position; however, the succeeding ambassador, David Wilkins, stated that the Northwest Passage was in international waters.

On July 9, 2007, Prime Minister Harper announced the establishment of a deep-water port in the far North. In the government press release the Prime Minister is quoted as saying, “Canada has a choice when it comes to defending our sovereignty over the Arctic. We either use it or lose it. And make no mistake, this Government intends to use it. Because Canada’s Arctic is central to our national identity as a northern nation. It is part of our history. And it represents the tremendous potential of our future."

On July 10, 2007, Rear Admiral Timothy McGee of the United States Navy, and Rear Admiral Brian Salerno of the United States Coast Guard announced that the United States would also be increasing its ability to patrol the Arctic.

5 posted on 12/14/2009 2:45:51 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Not only is the 5-7 year figure several years old its totally wrong, even the scientist he was quoting is distancing himself from it.

lol.


6 posted on 12/14/2009 2:46:13 PM PST by GeronL (Join the Palin Beer Summit Putsch!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
It’s one thing to gripe and complain about these things and disagree with it, but it’s quite another to convince your friends and neighbors and relatives and coworkers...

THEREFORE..., it’s also absolutely necessary for people to know the information in the following documentary. If there were simply one video that you could see and/or show people you know... this would be the one...


The following is an excellent video documentary on the so-called “Global Warming” I would recommend it to all FReepers. It’s a very well-made documentary.

“The Great Global Warming Swindle”

If you want to download it, via a BitTorrent site (using a BitTorrent client), you can get it at the following link. Information about BitTorrent protocol and BitTorrent clients and their comparison at these three links (in this sentence). Some additional BitTorrent information here and here.

Download it here...
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3635222/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
[This is a high-quality copy, of about a gigabyte in size. This link is the information about it, and you have to click the download link to get it on your BitTorrent client software. You'll also find users' comments here, too.]

It’s worth seeing and having for relatives, friends, neighbors and coworkers to see.

Also, see it online here...
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/great_global_warming_swindle.php
[this one is considerably lower quality, is a flash video and viewable online, of course..., and also, you can download flash video on a website either yourself or some software doing it.]

Buy it on DVD here...
[this would be the very highest quality version, on a DVD disk, of several gigabytes in size...] At Amazon, it seems to be high-priced now and have only a few copies right now.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000WLUXZE

At WAGtv (a UK shop), but don't know about shipping. The price is reasonable, though.
https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html
[And..., some information from WAGtv about this item.]


Also, in split parts on YouTube...

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 1 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TqqWJugXzs

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 2 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5rGpDMN8lw

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 3 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzFL6Ixe_bo

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 4 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNQy2rT_dvU

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 5 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dzIMXGI6k8

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 6 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GjOgQN1Jco

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 7 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHI2GfbfrYw

The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 8 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N9benJh3Lw

The Great Global Warming Swindle - Credits (Part 9 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1ifP-ri58

7 posted on 12/14/2009 2:46:27 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

Sunspot Activity at 8,000-Year High

By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer
posted: 27 October 2004
12:58 pm ET

Sunspots have been more common in the past seven decades than at any time in the last 8,000 years, according to a new historic reconstruction of solar activity.

Many researchers have tried to link sunspot activity to climate change, but the new results cannot be used to explain global warming, according to the scientists who did the study.

Sunspots are areas of intense magnetic energy. They act like temporary caps on upwelling matter, and they are the sites of occasional ferocious eruptions of light and electrified gas. More sunspots generally means increased solar activity.

Sunspots have been studied directly for about four centuries, and these direct observations provide the most reliable historic record of solar activity. Previous studies have suggested cooler periods on Earth were related to long stretches with low sunspot counts. From the 1400s to the 1700s, for example, Europe and North America experienced a "Little Ice Age." For a period of about 50 years during that time, there were almost no sunspots.

But a firm connection between sunspot numbers and climate remains elusive, many scientists say.

Better record

The new study, led by Sami Solanki of the Max Planck Institute in Germany, employed a novel approach to pinning down sunspot activity going back 11,400 years:

Cosmic rays constantly bombard Earth's atmosphere. Chemical interactions create a fairly constant source of stuff called carbon-14, which falls to Earth and is absorbed and retained by trees. But charged particles hurled at Earth by active sunspots deflect cosmic rays. So when the Sun gets wild, trees record less carbon-14.

While trees don't typically live more than a few hundred years or perhaps a couple thousand, dead and buried trees, if preserved, carry a longer record, "as long as tree rings can be identified," said Manfred Schuessler, another Max Planck Institute researcher who worked on the study.

The study's finding: Sunspot activity has been more intense and lasted longer during the past 60 to 70 years than at anytime in more than eight millennia.

Sunspot activity is known to ebb and flow in two cycles lasting 11 and 88 years (activity is currently headed toward a short-term minimum). Astronomers think that longer cycles -- or at least long-term variations -- also occur. Scientists in other fields have shown that during the past 11,000 years, Earth's climate has had many dramatic shifts.

"Whether solar activity is a dominant influence in these [climate] changes is a subject of intense debate," says Paula Reimer, a researcher at Queen's University Belfast who wrote an analysis of the new study for Nature. Why? Because "the exact relationship of solar irradiance to sunspot number is still uncertain."

In general, studies indicate changes in solar output affect climate during periods lasting decades or centuries, "but this interpretation is controversial because it is not based on any understanding of the relevant physical processes," study member Schuessler told SPACE.com. Translation: Scientists have a lot to learn about the Sun-Earth connection.

Better understanding

The study's methods appear solid: "The models reproduce the observed record of sunspots extremely well, from almost no sunspots during the seventeenth century to the current high levels," Reimer said.

The research could eventually help scientists understand why the climate has changed in the past and allow for better predictions of future change.

"The reconstructed sunspot number will nonetheless provide a much-needed record of solar activity," Reimer said. "This can then be compared with palaeoclimate data sets to test theories of possible solar-climate connections, as well as enabling physicists to model long-term solar variability."

Whatever the result, change is likely to continue.

Solanki's team calculates that, based on history, the chances of sunspot activity remaining at the currently high levels for another 50 years is 8 percent. Odds are just 1 percent the solar exuberance will last through the end of this century.

8 posted on 12/14/2009 2:46:58 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Mr. Gore, I hope soon that this becomes your world view...


9 posted on 12/14/2009 2:47:03 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Completely immune from lying. A protected class that has no responsibility, no account, and can say virtually any lie to get what it wants.


10 posted on 12/14/2009 2:47:12 PM PST by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Are Sunspots Disappearing?

September 3, 2009: The sun is in the pits of the deepest solar minimum in nearly a century. Weeks and sometimes whole months go by without even a single tiny sunspot. The quiet has dragged out for more than two years, prompting some observers to wonder, are sunspots disappearing?

"Personally, I'm betting that sunspots are coming back," says researcher Matt Penn of the National Solar Observatory (NSO) in Tucson, Arizona. But, he allows, "there is some evidence that they won't."

Penn's colleague Bill Livingston of the NSO has been measuring the magnetic fields of sunspots for the past 17 years, and he has found a remarkable trend. Sunspot magnetism is on the decline:

Above: Sunspot magnetic fields measured by Livingston and Penn
from 1992 - Feb. 2009 using an infrared Zeeman splitting technique. [more]

"Sunspot magnetic fields are dropping by about 50 gauss per year," says Penn. "If we extrapolate this trend into the future, sunspots could completely vanish around the year 2015."

This disappearing act is possible because sunspots are made of magnetism. The "firmament" of a sunspot is not matter but rather a strong magnetic field that appears dark because it blocks the upflow of heat from the sun's interior. If Earth lost its magnetic field, the solid planet would remain intact, but if a sunspot loses its magnetism, it ceases to exist.

"According to our measurements, sunspots seem to form only if the magnetic field is stronger than about 1500 gauss," says Livingston. "If the current trend continues, we'll hit that threshold in the near future, and solar magnetic fields would become too weak to form sunspots."

"This work has caused a sensation in the field of solar physics," comments NASA sunspot expert David Hathaway, who is not directly involved in the research. "It's controversial stuff."

The controversy is not about the data. "We know Livingston and Penn are excellent observers," says Hathaway. "The trend that they have discovered appears to be real." The part colleagues have trouble believing is the extrapolation. Hathaway notes that most of their data were taken after the maximum of Solar Cycle 23 (2000-2002) when sunspot activity naturally began to decline. "The drop in magnetic fields could be a normal aspect of the solar cycle and not a sign that sunspots are permanently vanishing."

Penn himself wonders about these points. "Our technique is relatively new and the data stretches back in time only 17 years. We could be observing a temporary downturn that will reverse itself."

The technique they're using was pioneered by Livingston at the McMath-Pierce solar telescope near Tucson. He looks at a spectral line emitted by iron atoms in the sun's atmosphere. Sunspot magnetic fields cause the line to split in two—an effect called "Zeeman splitting" after Dutch physicist Pieter Zeeman who discovered the phenomenon in the 19th century. The size of the split reveals the intensity of the magnetism.

Above: Zeeman splitting of spectral lines from a strongly-magnetized
sunspot. [more]

Astronomers have been measuring sunspot magnetic fields in this general way for nearly a century, but Livingston added a twist. While most researchers measure the splitting of spectral lines in the visible part of the sun's spectrum, Livingston decided to try an infra-red spectral line. Infrared lines are much more sensitive to the Zeeman effect and provide more accurate answers. Also, he dedicated himself to measuring a large number of sunspots—more than 900 between 1998 and 2005 alone. The combination of accuracy and numbers revealed the downturn.

If sunspots do go away, it wouldn't be the first time. In the 17th century, the sun plunged into a 70-year period of spotlessness known as the Maunder Minimum that still baffles scientists. The sunspot drought began in 1645 and lasted until 1715; during that time, some of the best astronomers in history (e.g., Cassini) monitored the sun and failed to count more than a few dozen sunspots per year, compared to the usual thousands.

"Whether [the current downturn] is an omen of long-term sunspot decline, analogous to the Maunder Minimum, remains to be seen," Livingston and Penn caution in a recent issue of EOS. "Other indications of solar activity suggest that sunspots must return in earnest within the next year."

Whatever happens, notes Hathaway, "the sun is behaving in an interesting way and I believe we're about to learn something new."

Author: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA

11 posted on 12/14/2009 2:47:22 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maggief

He’s such a doofus...This is like hearing him every day...”count every vote”...He makes me want to scream and strangle him at the same time.


12 posted on 12/14/2009 2:47:38 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
How sunspots were observed “back then”?

From NASA...


The Sunspot Cycle
(Updated 2009/12/08)

Sunspot Numbers

In 1610, shortly after viewing the sun with his new telescope, Galileo Galilei (or was it Thomas Harriot?) made the first European observations of Sunspots. Continuous daily observations were started at the Zurich Observatory in 1849 and earlier observations have been used to extend the records back to 1610. The sunspot number is calculated by first counting the number of sunspot groups and then the number of individual sunspots.

13 posted on 12/14/2009 2:47:52 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
I'm looking forward to the coming decade of colder winters... :-)


Dalton Minimum Returns

 21 Apr 09 - Paul Stanko of NOAA writes meteorologist Anthony Watts to tell him of an interesting development in his tracking of the International Sunspot Number (ISN).

Paul writes:

My running mean of the International Sunspot Number for 2009 just dipped below 1.00. For anything comparable you now need to go back before 1913 (which scored a 1.43) which could mean we're now competing directly with the Dalton Minimum. Just in case you'd like another tidbit, here is something that puts our 20 to 30 day spotless runs in perspective… the mother of all spotless runs (in the heart of the Maunder Minimum, of course!) was from October 15, 1661 to August 2, 1671. It totaled 3579 consecutive spotless days, all of which had obs. To say that that we in interesting times is a huge understatement. We are about to enter a Grand Minimum, which in the past have produced a cooler planet, while our government is preparing for run-away global warming. Who could have predicted this stupidity?


Is a new Dalton Minimum approaching?

Russ Steele

Well 2008 arrived last night and Sunspot Cycle 24 was absent. While we had a flurry of excitement a few week ago when a patch of reverse polarity showed on the Suns surface it soon faded. The Sun reverses polarity with each cycle change. As we have discussed in the past the length of the roughly 11-year sunspot cycle is correlated with temperature and a late arriving cycle can have some long term climate implications for us folks here on Earth. The Cycle 23 solar minimum was at 1996.5, so with an average 11 year cycle we should have seen the new minimum in mid-2007. Here we are in 2008 and the next cycle is already six months late, and the defining minimum generally occurs 12-20 months after the first spot of the new cycle. This would indicate the ending minimum of Cycle 23 and the start of Cycle 24 will come in mid  2009, resulting in a 13 year cycle, the longest since 1784-1797. Interesting to note that this cycle started a long series - 13.6, 12.3, 12.7 years, which coincided with the cold period known as the Dalton Minimum. Stay tuned, these are going to be interesting times. Sun cycles indicate cooling and the politicians are trying stop global warming. We may need a little extra warming over the next thirty years.

Thanks to David Archibald for this graphic showing the relationship of cycle length to temperature in New Hampshire.


Dalton Minimum

The Dalton minimum in the 400 year history of sunspot numbers The Dalton Minimum was a period of low solar activity, named for the English meteorologist John Dalton, lasting from about 1790 to 1830. Like the Maunder Minimum and Spörer Minimum, the Dalton Minimum coincided with a period of lower-than-average global temperatures. The Oberlach Station in Germany, for example, experienced a 2.0° C decline over 20 years. The Year Without a Summer, in 1816, also occurred during the Dalton Minimum.


14 posted on 12/14/2009 2:48:27 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All; caveat emptor
Link

Arctic summers ice-free ‘by 2013’
12 December 2007

Current model


15 posted on 12/14/2009 2:50:39 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Mr Gore’s office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr Maslowksi as a “ballpark figure” several years ago in a conversation with Mr Gore.

A ballpark figure?

When did scientists start using "ballpark figures" to scare trillions of dollars from taxpayers?

16 posted on 12/14/2009 2:51:14 PM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Well, I would agree with Lord Monckton, that Gobal Warming is indeed happening. I say that “overall” that it’s been happening, and that this is not the problem that we’re contending with. To say it’s not happening is to argue about the wrong thing.

Heck! If the Northwest Passage opens up again for open and free shipping, for the first time in many hundreds of years again — that’s fine by me... LOL...

The real issue here, in all this stuff is “Anthropogenic Global Warming” — and having all the Arctic Ice melt away, won’t affect the argument about Anthropogenic Global Warming... :-)


17 posted on 12/14/2009 2:53:31 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith
I will make Al Gore a deal. If there is no ice at the North Pole in 5 years i will kiss his butt under Kaufman's clock in the middle of the ST. Patrick Day parade in Pittsburgh. But if there is ice i get to remove both of his testicles with a butter knife. Well AL it is time to put up or shut up. Lets see if ya got the Kahunas to take me up it!
18 posted on 12/14/2009 2:54:30 PM PST by Plumberman27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Oh, and one more thing about Global Warming that is occurring and the Arctic Ice Cap, even though it’s been melting away up to the present, there has been a dramatic change in the sunspot cycle, leading us into another “minimum” again, of the sunspot cycle and that typically produces more colder weather.

But, as with all cycles, even with this sunspot minimum, it will eventually be over and it will start warming once again, after the sunspot minimum is over. So, we’ll be right back again to the warming — and we might be sailing through that famed “Northwest Passage” once again..., sooner than expected... :-)


19 posted on 12/14/2009 2:56:09 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maggief
 Al Gore
20 posted on 12/14/2009 2:56:18 PM PST by Tawiskaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief; All

Hockey Stick over Time - Narrated
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxmo9DskYE


21 posted on 12/14/2009 2:57:23 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
From the Times article:
Richard Lindzen, a climate scientist at the Massachusets Institute of Technology who does not believe that global warming is largely caused by man, said: “He’s just extrapolated from 2007, when there was a big retreat, and got zero.”

You can see that 2007 was a year with less ice. But also see how the retreat is retreating!


22 posted on 12/14/2009 2:57:34 PM PST by CedarDave (FOX news:"Fair and balanced (no matter what the White House says) . We report because others won't.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

23 posted on 12/14/2009 2:58:23 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plumberman27
Ouch !
24 posted on 12/14/2009 2:59:42 PM PST by steelyourfaith (Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrPCUWWjh0c&feature=player_embedded

December 13, 2008

Five Years. Mark it down. Al Gore spoke to a German audience this week at the opening of a dinosaur park. In this German news clip you can hear him talk about the polar ice cap disappearing in 5 ...
Five Years. Mark it down.
Al Gore spoke to a German audience this week at the opening of a dinosaur park. In this German news clip you can hear him talk about the polar ice cap disappearing in 5 YEARS!

(no links)

Warning from Gore on future - S.F. speech focuses on global warming
San Francisco Chronicle (CA) - Sunday, June 5, 2005
Author: Cecilia M. Vega, Chronicle Staff Writer

EXCERPT

In 15 years, Gore said , there will be no more glaciers on Mount Kilimanjaro. As for Glacier National Park in Montana, he said, “Within 20 years, this is the park that will be formerly known as Glacier.” And the Rhone Glacier in Switzerland “is almost completely gone,” he said.

//

GORE’S ENVIRONMENTAL STAKE - WHITE HOUSE STANCE ON GLOBAL WARMING COULD SERIOUSLY AFFECT POLITICAL CLIMATE TOO
Washington Post - Tuesday, October 21, 1997
Author: Joby Warrick, Washington Post Staff Writer
Al Gore was moving fast, as though the big glacier would melt before he reached it. With reporters puffing and wheezing in his wake, he scaled five miles of nearly vertical mountain trails to touch the ice and strike a symbolic blow against global warming.

“It’s melting right before our eyes,” the vice president observed as he stood above Grinnell Glacier , the great river of ice amid the jagged peaks of Glacier National Park. Another 30 years of warming will reduce Grinnell to a dirty puddle, Gore said — and future tourists will have to settle for “the park formerly known as Glacier .”

(snip)


25 posted on 12/14/2009 3:07:16 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maggief

In other words, global warming will actually be here two days before the day after tomorrow. Oh my God, that is...........TODAY


26 posted on 12/14/2009 3:07:48 PM PST by 12chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief


Al Gore - Supremus Idiotus


27 posted on 12/14/2009 3:11:57 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Socialism is hip until somebody loses a paycheck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Al Gore -- The LIAR King


28 posted on 12/14/2009 3:17:22 PM PST by Juan Medén
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

” That may very well be true about the polar ice caps. There’s actually no disputing that there’s been “Global Warming” over the last many decades. “

COMPLETE, UTTER BS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Evidently, you never looked at what actually happened to the Arctic ice after Al Gore threatened that the Northwest Passage was going to reopen. The ice got noticeably larger and thicker, and there was ABSOLUTELY NO CORRELATION TO HIS PREDICTIONS. THEY WERE AND ARE FALSE, FALSE, FALSE. Just LOOK at the damn EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!

THE WORLD HAS NOT BEEN WARMING FOR THE PAST MANY DECADES; IT HAS BEEN COOLING FOR THE LAST TEN. AND YOU CAN’T FOOL US ANYMORE, YOU LYING BASTARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


29 posted on 12/14/2009 3:18:23 PM PST by Humble Servant (see y'all in the Gulag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Humble Servant

Well, that’s what Lord Monckton says, in that he believes the figures which are presented showing that there is Global Warming. And I would agree with Lord Monckton. There’s been Global Warming in the past and there’s no reason why there can’t be Global Warming in the future either.

The thing that he disputes (and likewise with me) is that there is no case for “Anthropogenic Global Warming”...


30 posted on 12/14/2009 3:22:48 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The Best of Al Bore:

"The Polar Ice Cap Will Be GONE in 5 Years!"

Click on the image below to see Al Gore claim that the ice cap will vanish in five years!

(It will not. It is thicker and larger than ever.)


"The center of the Earth is millions of degrees..."

The center of the earth is estimated to actually be between only 4,000 and 7,000 degrees.

:)

31 posted on 12/14/2009 3:27:03 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Even Lord Monckton, whom many FReepers quote here, says that he believes that "Global Warming" is a fact and it is happening. He says he does not dispute those who say that Global Warming is happening.

Actually, Monckton has said on many recent videos that there has been no warming for 15 years.

32 posted on 12/14/2009 3:28:17 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
listen... warming, cooling, it was 50/50. so i took a shot!!!

Ohh WOE is me... whys everybody pickin on me???

33 posted on 12/14/2009 3:31:08 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

You are wrong about what Lord Monckton says. Lord Monckton says we have always had climate change and for 9 years it is getting cooler. You are making stuff up.


34 posted on 12/14/2009 3:38:02 PM PST by poodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: poodle
You were saying ...

You are wrong about what Lord Monckton says. Lord Monckton says we have always had climate change and for 9 years it is getting cooler. You are making stuff up.

Nope, not making it up. It's in his video that he sells, right along with the other video documentary that I presented (The Great Global Warming Swindle). Lord Monckton is selling both of those on a website that he references.

The video that he made and sells, says this very thing... that I just said. He says that he does not dispute that Global Warming has been happening. He makes a point of saying that he does not believe the "Anthropogenic Global Warming" is happening.

It's right on the video that I have from him... :-)

The video is sold here... and is made and produced by Lord Monckton...

GreatSwindle.com

I viewed it again, last night, and that's exactly what Lord Monckton says... You're more than welcome to verify that yourself any time you want... :-)

35 posted on 12/14/2009 3:44:42 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Hide the Decline for Global Goring.

Pray for America and Gov Palin


36 posted on 12/14/2009 3:46:44 PM PST by bray (Palin can see the White House from her Porch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
You were saying ...

Actually, Monckton has said on many recent videos that there has been no warming for 15 years.

Lord Monckton's own video that he produces and sells, says that right in it. He's got it on this page to sell if you want to view it. You'll see him say it there... anyone can verify it... :-)

GreatSwindle.com

I just saw it again last night and I can affirm that once more. But, please..., do look for yourself and see what he says...

37 posted on 12/14/2009 3:47:39 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“Inconvenient truth’ for the “inglourious basterd”...


38 posted on 12/14/2009 3:51:23 PM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poodle; Star Traveler
You are making stuff up.
On a video posted on youtube on December 12, he says at least 2x that we haven't had warming for 15 years.
39 posted on 12/14/2009 3:53:46 PM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: eastsider; poodle
You were saying ...

On a video posted on youtube on December 12, he says at least 2x that we haven't had warming for 15 years.

And I just gave you a video, and the reference for getting that video (which I have) -- which he makes and sells himself where he says that he agrees with those who say that we have had Global Warming and he does not dispute that. He says he disputes "Anthropogenic Global Warming"...

You may want to write to Lord Monckton and ask him if he goes by the one statement or the other... :-)

40 posted on 12/14/2009 3:57:20 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
You may want to write to Lord Monckton and ask him if he goes by the one statement or the other
Depending on the starting point, his statements are not mutually exclusive statements. Since about 150 years ago, there's been statistically significant warming; since about 15 years ago, there hasn't.
41 posted on 12/14/2009 4:02:29 PM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eastsider; poodle
What I'll do for the FReepers here and with what Lord Monckton says, is that I'll transcribe his talk just before that statement and just after that statement that he made, giving it in context so that everyone can see (in print, anyway...) what he says in his own video that he promotes himself (and he's noted as the one who has produced this video in the credits).

This will clear it up and especially since he's promoting this one himself.

And then anyone will be free to double-check it themselves...

I would think that everyone would like to be absolutely clear on what Lord Monckton does think about this...

42 posted on 12/14/2009 4:02:53 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
You were saying ...

Depending on the starting point, his statements are not mutually exclusive statements. Since about 150 years ago, there's been statistically significant warming; since about 15 years ago, there hasn't.

I'll tell you the main thing he wanted people to know when he said that. He wanted people to know that he had no complaint against those who say there has been Global Warming, because he said he believed it had been happening too.

He said that his complaint was against "Anthropogenic Global Warming"...

And he was very clear on that... (both of those statements...).

43 posted on 12/14/2009 4:05:07 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
I just saw it again last night and I can affirm that once more. But, please..., do look for yourself and see what he says...

See him on this recent video, at 2:47.

44 posted on 12/14/2009 4:06:14 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

I’m already clear about it, tx.


45 posted on 12/14/2009 4:09:08 PM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I’ll have the transcript from the video that Lord Monckton sells and post it here, to you... (it’ll be tonight that I get it) — and it will be that section that contains what he said about agreeing that there has been Global Warming and that he has no complaints against those who maintain that.

He says that his complaint is against “Anthropogenic Global Warming.

I’m going back to it and get the transcript for you and all the FReepers here... :-)


46 posted on 12/14/2009 4:13:12 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

In order to have central control and thwart all safety measures on the level and speed of adapting that control by centralized authority, you must have an accepted CRISIS.

Rome didn’t award the dictatorship without an impending Crisis.

It does’t matter that the Crisis can’t be consistantly described or verified, it is only important that it be such a shadowy thing that it can’t be explained away by any evidence. It also can’t be minimized by those that are not as caring as the leftist. If they voted for Reagan or Bush or any of that crowd they really don’t have a voice in deciding important issues.


47 posted on 12/14/2009 4:13:44 PM PST by KC Burke (...but He has made the trains run on time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Oh..., and I didn't mean that you had to take my word for it. You can see Lord Monckton's video that he produced and sells -- by going right here... and check it out for yourself. No need to believe just what I say... :-)

GreatSwindle.com

48 posted on 12/14/2009 4:16:20 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler; Maceman; eastsider

I think we are all in agreement that manmade gases, which account for about 0.28% of the greenhouse effect has no effect on the climate. (Some would even argue how much the greenhouse effect matters.)

I too used to think that “Yes - it looks like it might be getting warmer for now.” But, also saying - look at the 22 year solar cycle to bring about some cooling. (Even more now that this low cycle has lasted so long.) AND - the previous interglacial warm periods have been about 11,000 to 14,000 years in length. We are at about 11,000 years for our current warm period. So it would not surprise me if we started heading to another ice age.

The Climate Swindle document looks to be from 2007, so perhaps filmed in 2006 even? The recent data does show more of a cooling trend, so perhaps Mockton is taking into account 3 more years of data, and revised his thoughts a bit (as I have).

Or, perhaps he has revised his thoughts based on the recent emails and crooked data that he (an I) have been looking at to make our pronouncements.

Just some thoughts on the various comments that he (and I) have made in the past.


49 posted on 12/14/2009 4:36:57 PM PST by 21twelve (Drive Reality out with a pitchfork if you want , it always comes back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve; Maceman; eastsider

Yeah, I would agree with you on the effect of the mankind on the climate, as you explain it. :-)

And in terms of it getting warmer, as you said, it was before but now it’s not. And I would agree with that, too. That’s why I post the information on the Dalton Minimum and what impact the similar circumstances will have now, as we’ve entered the same kind of solar minimum as the Dalton Minimum, now. That’s just been in the last couple of years.

I’ve made the kinds of distinctions that I have, in these posts, to hopefully get FReepers less concerned and/or worried about those who give the historical data for Global Warming that we’ve had. I’m saying that this is no big deal, as Global Warming and Global Cooling happens all the time, without any input from mankind... :-)

So, I’m just saying don’t get upset about someone saying that there has been Global Warming — because there has been... LOL...

The “big deal” to hammer away on, is “Anthropogenic Global Warming”. I would keep the other side “on this issue” and not on whether there has been Global Warming or Global Cooling... :-)


50 posted on 12/14/2009 4:52:30 PM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson