Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Insurgents Hack U.S. Drones (WHAT?)
WSJ ^ | 12/17/09 | SIOBHAN GORMAN, YOCHI J. DREAZEN and AUGUST COLE

Posted on 12/17/2009 3:15:05 AM PST by Mikey_1962

WASHINGTON -- Militants in Iraq have used $26 off-the-shelf software to intercept live video feeds from U.S. Predator drones, potentially providing them with information they need to evade or monitor U.S. military operations.

Senior defense and intelligence officials said Iranian-backed insurgents intercepted the video feeds by taking advantage of an unprotected communications link in some of the remotely flown planes' systems. Shiite fighters in Iraq used software programs such as SkyGrabber -- available for as little as $25.95 on the Internet -- to regularly capture drone video feeds, according to a person familiar with reports on the matter.

U.S. officials say there is no evidence that militants were able to take control of the drones or otherwise interfere with their flights. Still, the intercepts could give America's enemies battlefield advantages by removing the element of surprise from certain missions and making it easier for insurgents to determine which roads and buildings are under U.S. surveillance.

The drone intercepts mark the emergence of a shadow cyber war within the U.S.-led conflicts overseas. They also point to a potentially serious vulnerability in Washington's growing network of unmanned drones, which have become the American weapon of choice in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Obama administration has come to rely heavily on the unmanned drones because they allow the U.S. to safely monitor and stalk insurgent targets in areas where sending American troops would be either politically untenable or too risky.

The stolen video feeds also indicate that U.S. adversaries continue to find simple ways of counteracting sophisticated American military technologies.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: drones; hacks; reaper; uav
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: khnyny

I don’t think we do anywhere nearly enough to mess with the minds of our enemies. Of course, if we WERE doing it we wouldn’t know about it anyway, so maybe I’m wrong! But I would love to be in charge of messing with their minds for a few months. I would send my carrier based planes on low level supersonic flights over their population areas at all times of the day and night. On each flight I’d drop leaflets reminding them the sonic booms could just as easily be enhanced with the booms of real ordnance!


21 posted on 12/17/2009 5:08:17 AM PST by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

LOL. You can win the war without ever going to battle. That’s the goal - or at least it should be.


22 posted on 12/17/2009 5:12:41 AM PST by khnyny (The problem is Obama didn't grow up watching "Hogan's Heroes" (American exceptionalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

I seriously would drop leaflets all over Iran advising the citizens that the World will not let the Mullahs have access to nuclear weapons, period, even if it means a military attack against them. I would further advise the citizens that their best bet to avoid such an attack would be for them to rise up and overthrow the thugs that have taken over their country for 30 plus years. Given the choice of doing battle with those of the military who would turn against their own people and dealing with the kind of attack it would take to destroy the regime’s nuclear aspirations the former is much better than the latter.

I know this is meddling with the internal affairs of a sovereign nation, but the alternatives are much worse. I’m sure if the world considers advising a revolution to overthrow the Mullahs an act of meddling they will be much less happy with the kind of meddling it will take when the world has to move to deny Iran a nuclear capability. The choice should be theirs.


23 posted on 12/17/2009 6:03:46 AM PST by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LRoggy
Does this software work for intercepting DirectTV? How about ESPN, CNBC, etc.?

DirectTV signals are encrypted. The software could intercept them, but decoding would be another story.

24 posted on 12/17/2009 6:09:55 AM PST by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
"Allah FUBAR"

Our POTUS-clown's so finished.
The imbecile single handedly did for the Democrat Party what the entire combined GOP & Co couldn't over 25 years.
Whadda guy.

I say let us raise a glass to zerO, "The Destroyer". LOL

25 posted on 12/17/2009 6:14:38 AM PST by Landru (Forget the pebble Grasshopper, just leave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Ya mean they don’t encrypt this stuff? Hell, when I was in the Army in 1980, they encrypted voice transmissions. Why can’t these idiots encrypt video transmissions?


26 posted on 12/17/2009 6:22:49 AM PST by Little Ray (Cheney / Norris in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
But, but, but . . . UAVs are supposed to be the PERFECT solution for all our air warfare needs. Who needs an Air Force with real pilots? Just put some pasty-faced videogame addicts in front of UAV monitors at some remote base in Nevada and let the REAL men fight wars on the ground. What could be simpler and more elegant?

If camel-kissing troglodyte throwbacks to the 7th Century can figure out how to hack our drones using off-the-shelf components that cost little more than family meal bucket of extra-crispy at KFC, imagine what the Russian and Chinese governments can do with their resources.

27 posted on 12/17/2009 6:27:51 AM PST by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Well..

Looks like we should go back to carpet bombing.


28 posted on 12/17/2009 6:30:12 AM PST by RandallFlagg (30-year smoker, E-Cigs helped me quit, and O wants me back smoking again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

It’s not.
The front page Wall Street Journal today was good.
The Einsteins at the Pentagon didn’t think it necessary, as they assumed the terrorists wouldn’t know how to intercept the data!!!


29 posted on 12/17/2009 7:41:29 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (The End of an Error - 01/20/2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

It’s absolutely inverdible that that stream is not encrypted.

For cryin’ out loud!

Heads should roll over this.

And watch what the response will be: “We need a 10 bil contract and then we’ll get right on that”.


30 posted on 12/17/2009 7:44:39 AM PST by Pessimist (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

The Age of Incompetence continues......


31 posted on 12/17/2009 7:46:28 AM PST by metalcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Don’t they know how to secure their wireless nets?

Here is a hint, you use very long passwords ... sheesh.


32 posted on 12/17/2009 7:47:40 AM PST by Tarpon ( ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

It is not a hack when software does what is was designed to do. It was bad design not the protect the transmissions.


33 posted on 12/17/2009 7:48:33 AM PST by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
Already posted 4 times.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=insurgents

34 posted on 12/17/2009 7:50:51 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Even though it was stupid to ever use unencrypted video, maybe this could be used to our advantage. Just like dummy radio transmissions providing false information. Let the enemy intercept unencrypted drone video that looks like we are searching for them somewhere else so they’ll feel nice and safe while a drone with encrypted video nails them out of nowhere.


35 posted on 12/17/2009 8:01:13 AM PST by Reagan is King (Every immigrant who comes here should be required within five years to learn English or leave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
But then I would change the frequency being used and transmit false info directly to their receivers!

Yup, yup. To paraphrase Sun Tzu: Deception. Deception. Deception.

Or maybe send drones all over the friggin place, transmitting data indicating a probable strike here, another probable strike there, etc. "He who defends everything defends nothing."

No doubt we're already doing this sort of thing, since our commanders have no doubt studied military history.
36 posted on 12/17/2009 8:06:15 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

There’s no way the Jihadis did this without outside help.


37 posted on 12/17/2009 8:07:45 AM PST by Catholic Canadian ( I love Stephen Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
Hacked image


38 posted on 12/17/2009 8:09:37 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Lukenbach Texas is barely there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: behzinlea
Just put some pasty-faced videogame addicts in front of UAV monitors at some remote base in Nevada and let the REAL men fight wars on the ground. What could be simpler and more elegant?

UAVs SUCK!

Videos illustrating why UAVs suck to the core. Why replace traditional maneuver warfare with push-button standoff firepower?

39 posted on 12/17/2009 8:16:14 AM PST by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thinking
If not, then perhaps the cheap software only allowed the transmissions to be intercepted and there was something more sophisticated used to crack the encryption.
40 posted on 12/17/2009 8:21:39 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson