Skip to comments.Michelle Obama Separated at Birth
Posted on 12/19/2009 5:16:07 AM PST by vrwc54
The likeness is amazing.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
She can’t help how she looks.
Personally I like to think of her as the First Wookie.
Thank You! This is really beneath us- ragging on a person because of their face. No one chooses how they are born.
I’m to the RIGHT of Rush Limbaugh and my quarrel isn’t with M.O.’s bad fashion taste but rather what is in her heart and head. If she were drop dead gorgeous she would still be what she really is. Much evil can be hidden behind beauty.
She looks like a fatter version of Verdine White of Earth Wind and Fire.
It’s parody. It’s more about her outfits. I didn’t use any wookies, klingons. I used Vanessa ?? who is beautiful. So say something useful.
Actually, she can. She can learn to walk like something other than a line backer and she can learn to dress more appropriately.
See # 7. (It was Vanessa Williams.)
It’s about how she dresses and the media insistance on telling us what a fashion icon she when she clearly is not one. It doesn’t have anything to do with what her face looks like.
Michelle Obama biggest problem is she seems to have a knack for wearing the wrong dress in almost every occasion.
Would probably help her also if someone taught her to walk like a lady instead of a Ohio State linebacker
All due respect but she changes how she looks every day and sometimes (not often) she looks great. Even the FReepers give her credit when she looks good.
But on the vast majority of occasions when she is in control of her own appearance and has the professional, tax-payer-paid help of a *lot* of people she is an embarrassment. I'm just a 50+ year old guy and even I can tell.
“Would probably help her also if someone taught her to walk like a lady instead of a Ohio State linebacker.”
Linebackers are people, too! And OSU has some great ones.
I don’t think the First Lady of the US should be doing Jacklinks beef jerky commercials.
And if the media didn't blitz us with constant reports on how beautiful, stately, magnificent, fit, fashionable and brilliant she is (the first lady the world has waited for!), then no one here would say a word.
The game is on...
She CAN help how she DRESSES.
I still say her dresser hates her.
I think her clothes are horrible. I noticed them way before he was elected.
I dont know who is making the statements on how fashionable she is..but most of what she wears look like they would end up on the clearance rack at walmarts. I wouldnt be caught dead in some of those getups.
As far as her face and body..one cant help ones looks and size. I have seen worse than her..she isnt so bad. However, I think he could have done way better, in the looks department (if one chooses a mate by looks).
Yes I did, as a matter of fact.
After I watched it, I posted my reaction to it.
Ragging on someone because of the way they look is what liberals do.
We are better than this.
Seriously, read the thread. It wasn't about how she looked. Half the pictures were of beautiful women. It was about her clothes. *sigh*
Always reminds me of Sasquatch.
Yep ... Mrs. Wee Wee exhibits that certain fashion sense that sets her apart in the crowd ... no doubt about it
This video is NOT about the she looks, it is about the way she DRESSES. She is almost always inappropriately attired. She wore a festive, sleeveless floral to a state funeral, for cryin' out loud!
Get over the "making fun of her looks" and see what is really being talked about...her clothing. It's quite embarrassing, unlike Jackie O. And that, she can certainly change.
For the first 6 months she wore nothing but sleeveless outfits, supposedly "showing off" her arms, I didn't see it myself. But hey, if you're going to accent your highlights, at least be aware of your ASSets, especially when they're HUGE, and wear clothes more slimming.
Barbara Bush was an elegant first lady. She didn't have the body of a 20 year old, because she WASN't a 20 year old. She wore clothes that made HER look good, and were befitting the wife of a dignitary.
Laura Bush was GORGEOUS, and yet her clothes were impecable. She ALWAYS looked good, befitting the office her husband held.
The media tries to spin Mo's "beauty", and yet they attacked Sarahs. They attacked Sarah because the RNC spent $150,000 on clothes. Well, Obamas don't have a problem with $100# Wagyu beef or $300 Krystal champagne, they could spend $150,000 on MOs ward robe for when she meets the Queen of England or a PrimeMinister or Presidents wife.
Laura Bush always had beautiful business skirt suits and dresses, instead of things that looked like were ripped of the White House windows.
MO was supposedly in the upper level business world before she became 1st Wookie. You're going to tell me she dressed like THAT for success?
Obamas MIGHT be still considered NEW to the position, but they had plenty of time beforehand to come up to speed on style, fashion and ettiquette. Even if they were absolute newbs, they should still have a staff that could dress MO.
They DESERVE no slack.
Then she should stop looking for the spotlight.
That dress was the toughest one of all! There were simply NO dresses out there that looked like black widow spiders.
You are so right.
I was noticing that she seems to have a problem with walking. Is it because she is bow-legged, perhaps? She walks from side to side instead of back to front.
I think she is better looking than her husband.
More likely a weight displacement problem.
Way too much weight in the backside so it makes her walk spread legged to compensate so she stayed balanced. :)
I agree with you. I think we should address the issues and not her physiognomy nor form. I really hate it when they make fun of her.
Now..Al Franken...LOL! fire away!
Of course, she can’t help the way she looks. However, if Michelle Obama is to be considered “attractive”, then no woman that we used to think was attractive can any longer be. The standards of female beauty have to be completely reversed. And what of the soul of someone who pretends that she has any fashion sense? The world is upside down.
Are you serious?
The pinheads in the media are on a year-long orgasm marathon for the Obamas, so beauty isn't beauty any more?
Turn it off, man. It's no good for you.
I’m not sure you understood what I was saying. Cooking breakfast not, so see ya’ later.
Sarah Palin made clear that the RNC did NOT NOT NOT spend $150,000 on clothing.
Clothing in various styles and sizes were purchased ( FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY) and tried on in the privacy of their hotel rooms. All except the clothing that was appropriate and the right size were RETURNED!
Dude. I can only read what you've written. Your interior monologue is accessable only to you.
Nice deflection. You sound like you didn’t get your nap out. I still don’t think you get it. Please, let’s not get serious about a non serious subject. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so is ugly.
Only one of us is "getting serious." Its possible that, after you've digested your breakfast, you'll be better able to see which one. I can't guarantee it, though.
You sure do type a lot of words without saying anything. I thought our opinions were not very different, but it looks like you are in a mood to be snippy for the sake of being snippy. I’m sure someone else will come out to play. I’d rather go shampoo my hair, now. (I’m bald)
Thanks for keeping me in the loop.
I wouldn’t care if she were the most beautiful woman on the planet. She’s a socialist, tyrannical pig whose had everything handed to her on a silver platter.