Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim spokesman: "Muslims won't stand for airport body scanners"
Fox Morning News | 12/29/09

Posted on 12/29/2009 5:43:58 AM PST by pabianice

A Muslim spokesman was interviewed on Fox this AM. When asked if he thought that full-body scanners at airports would improve security, he replied that Muslims would never stand for them because they would show the bodies of Muslim women. The interviewer let that pass without any protest.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bodyscanners; crushislam; cult; enemywithin; islam; jihad; military; muslims; obama; religionofpeace; scanners; terrorism; terrorist; trojanhorse; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-304 next last
To: Hulka
PROFILE!

Assume the worst case. You get scanned and your naked as a baby picture gets posted on Free Republic. Could it be worse than that?

Actually it could. You could get on an airplane with a 25 year old kid from Nebraska who got converted to Islam and decided to go for the 72 virgins while on your flight. You can profile forever and not see this guy coming.

(No offense to anyone from Nebraska. Actually the kid could have been from Iowa.)

I'll take the naked on FR route every time.

121 posted on 12/29/2009 8:50:49 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

See my post #120.


122 posted on 12/29/2009 8:52:24 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: rstark56

***Ok buy you own airlines and no one but muslim will fly on it. That will solve the problem!***

NO! They would have to have a Muslim flight crew which I would not trust. Would anyone else want to pilot a group of Muslims into the USA?

MAKE THEM TAKE A SHIP!


123 posted on 12/29/2009 8:57:31 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Are my guns loaded? Break in and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

A few years of 0bamacare and doctors will be union thugs too.


124 posted on 12/29/2009 9:05:02 AM PST by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Unfortunately, I think you have rewarded bad behavior by now choosing not to fly because of these a**holes.

Not directed at you, but I thinks we are again sacrificing freedom for security.


125 posted on 12/29/2009 9:26:41 AM PST by ILikeBourbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
"NO ONE touches me without my express permission."

Is there a form we can fill out or something? Please?

126 posted on 12/29/2009 9:29:36 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
At what point do you tell the government to back-off and act responsibly?

So when the next bomber stuffs the explosives up his smelly hiney, are you willing to do the body-cavity search? I would guess not. So the question is one of tolerance: How much are you willing to tolerate to accommodate the government and their PC BS just so we don't offend those that would murder us?

Right now “security” at an airport is not providing any extra level of protection. Those that fly a lot, like us, we know it is all visuals to deceive the public into believing they are being protected. How many times have you heard some once-a-year traveler oohing and awwing over the wonderful security.

Recently watched some TSA muslime waltz right on past the screeners and into the terminal, never going through security. The TSA person wasn't even in uniform but was going on vacation. That person was recognized by the other TSA dolt and waved through. I spoke with the TSA supervisor, yeah, right, like talking to a HS drop-out. Then I called TSA and was told, by someone with a muslime name, that TSA people can come and go into an airport all they want, at any time they want (flying or working or not), and don't have to be screened. It was, “A perk that comes with the job.” No ID check to even confirm the person was still employed by TSA, no screening of the bag, nothing. Just let her walk on past. Heck, we don't even let the aircrew do that and they are flying the darned jet.

Insanity, but yet we make it more and more difficult and intrusive for the Amish, 80-yr old grandmas, toddlers, 50-ish W/M business travelers and leave the muslime part out of the equation.

127 posted on 12/29/2009 9:47:08 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
Have you seen the TSA goons? Ewww. . .and they LIKE pushing people around and would enjoy the opportunity to run the body-scan.

I think you are sadly right. I think some would get a thrill out of humiliating people.

128 posted on 12/29/2009 10:58:38 AM PST by T Minus Four (Christians follow Christ, not other Christians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Good Our problems are over. Put in the body scanners and muslims will self select not to fly. Brilliant!


129 posted on 12/29/2009 10:59:53 AM PST by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I have an idea that looking at bodies would very quickly become a job, just a job and not an exciting one. Ask doctors if they are titillated by looking at bodies.

Absolutely, unequivically not. Once you have seen the first thousand bodies, you’ve pretty much seen it all.


130 posted on 12/29/2009 11:04:54 AM PST by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: carcraft

And these scans...woudn’t the picture that is displayed basically be an x-ray. It’s not as though anyone’s naked body in the flesh is going to be shown for all the see, or even the scanner to see. I would have no problem with my x-ray pic basically showing my skeleton. Devices that could be used as bombs and the human skeleton is all that would be visible. I don’t see the problem.


131 posted on 12/29/2009 11:09:19 AM PST by Patriot4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

No. The solution is that muslim owned airlines will be given a very narrow corridor to fly on and will have fighter jet escorts on all flights. Deviate from the flight plan by a hair - get shot down.


132 posted on 12/29/2009 11:13:13 AM PST by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

LOL, that was funny. I guess it’s not one of our choices either that our govt stop bringing more and more muslims into our country as fast as they can. Also not our choice I guess. So this problem now is going to be a nightmare in 20 or so years for my poor kids and grandkids.


133 posted on 12/29/2009 11:17:36 AM PST by Patriot4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Let’s see what the president says...he’s a muslim after all.

You just reminded me of an interesting paradox there.

Here we have a Muslim flying on the largest passenger plane in the U.S.; that plane is constantly flying in an out of Washington DC with the president inside, and the White House within sight. Should that Muslim inside the plane be trusted while also flying "with" the president of the U.S. and within close proximity of the White House?
134 posted on 12/29/2009 12:12:39 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Muslims complaining, demanding??? Why, what a surprise.


135 posted on 12/29/2009 12:20:23 PM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Yep if you won’t got through it just don’t fly. There is no guarantee of being able to fly to anyone out there and if you don’t like the scanners drive.


136 posted on 12/29/2009 12:20:46 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

maybe we should just give a waiver to the Muslims. I mean they only make up about 1% of the population.

Why throw out the baby with the bathwater when we could scan the other 99% of travelers?


137 posted on 12/29/2009 12:43:34 PM PST by MNDude (The Republican Congress Economy--1995-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot4ever

No, the picture does not show the skeleton; it is a 3D view of the exterior fleshy parts of the body.


138 posted on 12/29/2009 2:11:09 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Good grief, and I do suppose Muslims will be exempt from this on religious grounds so what’s the point? I can’t even imagine the scale of magnitude this problem is going to be on once we have millions upon millions more muslims living here. I feel like going and apologizing to my kids right now for the hell that awaits them called their futures. My husband and I have tried our best but it does seem we’ve been outnumbered by the liberal forces.


139 posted on 12/29/2009 2:19:20 PM PST by Patriot4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
"Muslims won't stand for airport body scanners"

Muslims won't be boarding airplanes either. Problem solved.

140 posted on 12/29/2009 2:20:44 PM PST by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson