Skip to comments.No charges for Calif. officer who kicked suspect (VIDEO of pursuit and kick)
Posted on 12/30/2009 9:55:07 PM PST by dragnet2
LOS ANGELES - Los Angeles County prosecutors have decided no charges will be filed against a suburban police officer who kicked a surrendering suspect in the head after a dangerous car chase.
Rodriguez, a parolee heavily covered in gang tattoos, was lying face-down on the ground during the May 13 incident, which was broadcast by a TV news helicopter. After four officers converged on Rodriguez, two of them did a "high five."
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
I closely paraphrase the Bible.
Have you been spiked? Or are you tied up in knotts?
Rednecks don’t go on rampages unless they’ve gone stark raving mad.
I’m waiting for a single substantive argument against my position. Of all, only thefactor has come close to making this look reasonable, and he muffed it by declaring he has a closed mind regardless of what he sees.
“Have you been spiked? Or are you tied up in knotts?
Rednecks dont go on rampages unless theyve gone stark raving mad.”
Oh, so now you pretend to not understand? lol...next you should just resort to repeating “que” over and over.
It is pretty easy to understand. You use redneck in your name. Since you also use it as a pejorative for people you don’t like, you obviously use it in an ironic/insincere fashion.
So that makes you a liar from the get-go. How about that?
Is it your contention then, that “most” of FR is now gone “stark raving mad?” Ooh, another question to hide from.
Redneck Rampages (TM) are so unbefitting of self respecting Rednecks.
I believe it was Benjamin Franklin who said that the difference between the right word and the almost right word was like the difference between lightning and the lightning bug.
“Im waiting for a single substantive argument against my position.”
Well why didn’t you just say so?
Of course, since you refuse to accept ANY argument as substantive, and the only standards you use to judge the substance of an argument are your own mysterious rules...I guess you’ll be waiting a long time.
Who knew someone in an argument would believe that the other side lacks substance? I appreciate all these little gems you keep dropping...truly you have much World experience.
Say, answer the questions...why don’t you?
The say the same thing in some places about conservative gun-owners.
The arguments almost all fall into the category of “he deserved it.” Well, that’s what the courts and penal system are for.
One or two have ventured “the police were still at risk.” I’d be willing to entertain that if the only one to seriously broach the subject didn’t state he had a closed mind.
I wonder if Santa left any “teenage mutant ninja turtle pajamas” for these “public servants”.
An odd observation: I was looking for new underpants in Wal Mart the other day. I couldn’t find any in my preferred brand, but eventually located the same size in another brand. They were camo patterned. Figuring that it doesn’t matter what doesn’t show, I got them. Only after I opened the package at home did I notice that three out of the four briefs were not just camo colored, but emblazoned with Jolly Rogers, that were not mentioned on the package. (Skull and crossbones.) NOW I know who to give the skull and crossbone undies to....
Not very Bible literate, are you?
Many times it is...Must drive the liberal sympathizers of these violent, racist career criminals, nuts.
Can you imagine this gangster cockroach goes on a 35 minute death pursuit, causing multiple crashes of innocent people, all on video tape, and some of these people here cry and whine about the cop kicking this violent, racist criminal? wow....
3 types I will never tolerate are, child molesters, religious terrorist fanatics and violent career criminal gangsters... All deserve a bullet in the head.
I would imagine the only thing worse would be those that sympathize with the above, as seen on this thread.
We have a lot of cop hating pot smoking libertarian Freepers....
High speed chases are always very dangerous to the public. Just for that this guy should have been given a serious beating. I know it can’t be done these days due to the ACLU etc....But it used to be done and the criminals got part of their punishment on the street
That's an odd moniker...You're wearing your skin color on your sleeve?
Look, the prosecutors and the DA decided not to charge the two Police officers. Is this not good enough for you? It clearly chapped the hides of several other sympathizers of violent, racist career criminals that appeared on this thread.
If you don't like their decision, feel free to go protest outside city hall, or call CNN and complain.
Dumb enough to expect Peace Officers to obey the law. How dumb are you? ;0)
What law did they break??
Officer just gaining control of thug..
Samae as mace, stungun, stun them into peaceful compliance.
Right off the bat you punk out with bullshit.
“Look, the prosecutors and the DA decided not to charge the two Police officers.”
WTF does it mean, that the cops are innocent? How so?
“It clearly chapped the hides of several other sympathizers of violent, racist career criminals that appeared on this thread.”
And here you are, back where you started; name calling as well as justifying a beating someone other than yourself is getting.
Gratuitous beating administered by cops is unmanly, unconstitutional and un-American. Resorting to a technicality such as the DA refusing to press charges is your own admission that you have no argument. It doesn't have anything to do what was clearly done by the cops and it is the best evidence anyone needs that you or someone you care about has a much better chance of getting his teeth pushed down his throat by some cop is regards himself as the law.
“You need to get yourself on the correct side of the law.”
Oh, PULEEZE! This gangbanging narco terrorist, who probably is in the country illegally, was the one on the WRONG side of the law!