Posted on 01/10/2010 2:10:29 PM PST by mgist
Who commands Obama?
In August of 2008, I wrote about The Senate Mentality of John McCain, who was then the Republican candidate for president. In response to this article, I found myself in a discussion with some of my fellow writers and publishers over the McCain candidacy. My position was that I could not vote for McCain and could not encourage others to do so either.
But there was only one other choice, and that was Barack Obama. I certainly couldn't vote for him, and for all the same reasons that I couldn't vote for McCain but 10 times over. To try to deter an Obama disaster, I was told that I had to hold my nose and support McCain.
I made the point to my associates that the likely outcome of the general election would be that Obama would win against McCain and that we should consider the inevitable results — that with Democrats in control of both Congress and the White House, the country would finally be able to see exactly what their agenda is and what they are all about.
On the other hand, if somehow McCain pulled off a victory, it would be a huge loss for conservatives, and the Republican Party would be encouraged to continue moving even further to the left — leaving no hope for conservatives to have any representation in government for a very long time.
The only way to move the Republican Party back to its founding conservative principles would be to lose to the Democrats for lack of conservative support. As unpleasant as it would be for a few years, the end result would ultimately be the reestablishment of a conservative Republican Party. Although this idea didn't go over well with my associates, it is exactly what is happening now.
While Republican Party leaders are beginning to recognize the value of conservative voters, they are also working toward restoring those conservative values to the party instead of being dragged ever further to the left and trying to be more like Democrats. Republican leaders are now learning the need to contrast with the Democrats, rather than appease and emulate them.
Democrat Party leaders are now dragging the Democrat Party directly into socialism and Marxism, which is not going over too well with the American people. Over the past few months we have been seeing Democrats losing elections and now dropping out of the race for the 2010 elections as a result of their socialist ideology.
Had McCain won the election, the Republican Party would be doing the same thing by compromising with the left and making nice with the Marxists in the Congress. Without contrast to the Democrat agenda, Republicans would be no better off now than they were in 2008. It has taken the disaster of Obama to make them realize that the future of the Republican Party points to the right, not to the left.
Lots of people today have little or no confidence in the leadership abilities of Barack Obama. Everyone has been asking, who's running the show? — while Obama is out running around the country, still in campaign mode and making speeches. Who is giving orders to Obama while he is out playing front man? Whose policies are really being implemented in Washington? Is it David Axelrod's? Is it Rohm Emanuel's? Or is it George Soros'?
If you think that Obama came up with the agenda that is being implemented today, think again. If you think someone behind the scenes is directing Obama, that would be wrong too.
The pieces are starting to come together now. There is no one person in charge and Obama is simply the mouthpiece of a larger regime. Who is setting the agenda? We have to look at who supported and funded the Obama campaign.
It is foreign investors. It's the World Bank. It's the IMF (International Monetary Fund). It's the Federal Reserve bank. It's Ban Ki-moon and the UN. It is the European Union. It is the Skull & Bones Society and the Bilderberg group. It is even King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and the Palestinians to some extent.
Rather than think of it as the plans of one man, think of it as an ideology like radical Islam. The al Qaeda organization is global but bin laden doesn't call the shots, he just organizes and encourages terrorist cells around the world who share the same ideology. In a sense, bin Laden is very much like a community organizer.
But the ideology that Obama subscribes to is global socialism and communism. He takes his cues from many different special interests who all share his Marxist ideology and desire for global socialism. Nobody tells Obama what to do, instead they tell him what he should do to promote the ideology.
His objective is the same as the UN's objective — global socialism and the destruction of capitalism and the American value system. And if Islam can be a part of that plan then more power to them. Islam is a useful tool in destroying American Christian values.
As I said, the pieces are starting to come together and the dots are being connected. We have to look not only at who Obama is taking advice from, but also who is benefiting from his policies.
So far, I have only mentioned the international components of the cabal of which Obama is just one part. I should also include the domestic components such as: SEIU, ACLU, the Soros funded Apollo Foundation, the UAW and AFL-CIO, ACORN, AIG, Bear Sterns, etc. They are all part of the global socialist cabal and led by liberal Democrats.
Understand — Obama is not the leader or the head of the cabal. He too is simply one component, but a very important component in his present position. Obama knows the objectives of the cabal, he needs his advisors only to advise him on how best to achieve them.
He doesn't know squat about running this country, he knows only that he wants a global socialist world under one government. He shares that objective with those mentioned above in a "group think" kind of mentality. Kind of like a flock of birds, or an ant colony.
Although Obama was not brought into the Skull & Bones Society at Harvard University, he has connections to the group as well as close connections to the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign relations through his wife, Michelle, and close associates.
These groups are all global socialist organizations. I suspect they may have been involved in his grooming, especially in his adult years, but he was not inducted into Skull & Bones, I suspect, because his academic grades were not high enough. However, he came in contact with these people during his far left college years.
Obama is not the leader of the cabal because there is no one leader. That is the point I am making. It is a socialist cable of all that I have mentioned. I used the example of al Qaeda because Osama bin Laden, although the leader of his al Qaeda organization, is not the leader of all of the radical Islamist groups around the world. They just share the same radical Islamic beliefs and commit terrorism to promote the cause — not because they were ordered to, or directed by bin Laden.
They share a common philosophy, just as Obama does with the global socialist organizations and people. Obama is currently one component but will never rise to a more powerful position in the cabal once he is out of office. He is being used like a puppet to promote their goals.
99% of what Obama says publicly is scripted by his staff and speech writers. You don't think he actually writes his own speeches do you? That is why he is so dependent on the teleprompter. He depends on others to put words in his mouth. In his own words, he is a "blank canvas" for other to project their thoughts onto. Or to put it another way, an empty suit.
This is a result of the man having no core principles compatible with the American people. Were he to express his own views — as he did to Joe the Plumber — he would be rejected by the vast majority of the American people.
The media, although they may not see things the same way as Obama, are in his corner and cover for him because of purely political affiliation reasons. They are liberals who hate Republicans. They are interested only in promoting the Democrat party, and for that reason, are reluctant to be critical of Obama.
So if you want to know who is commanding Obama, look no further than the special interests who financed his campaign and their special interest in global socialism. Obama is simply one spoke in the wheel of Marxism which is determined to take over the world and redistribute the wealth.
related....
Good question.
One thing is for scure — Hussein is merely a puppet.
“This is a result of the man having no core principles compatible with the American people.”
Yup. No Core Principles even close to compatible with the American people. He’s clearly unqualified, to go along with being ineligible.
It’s time to take back the country. Starting with the ouster of this pretender is a good start.
You mean besides Goldman Sachs?
This might be a really dumb question but doesn’t this global socialist/communist cabal actually support themselves with capitalism??
And if the Demorats steal enough votes, and they just might, by 2012 we won't even have a country.
Enough of this win by losing dreck!
Skull and Bones Scoiety is at Yale--not Harvard!
Satan.
Sobering - but very accurate - summary of a subject I’ve long been puzzled by.
Good writer. Let’s hope his words get to Rush, etc for wider distribution. (A NY Times editorial ? Har, har.)
However, there is “somebody” or (bodies) who flipped the media in 2006-07-08 to Obama - they laid down and sucked his propaganda dry in those years by “not-covering” his faults and lack of experience. Destroying anybody who approached the truth about anything: and yet ignoring the gaping holes of grades, attendance, associations, performance, speeches (lack of) and votes (lack of) .... Anti-Hillary was one part, sure. But the whole package makes no sense.
Why? How could you get a group of hundreds of national reporters - all liberal, all extremists of course, but all from a background of “journalism” and - well, liberal activism too - to so blatantly violate everything they’ve been taught and been saying for the thousands of man-years they represent covering politics?
The same people who command the GOP, maybe?
Yep, and it’s Rahm not “Rohm” Emmanuel. Whoever wrote this article is a moron.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.