Skip to comments.Pastor James Manning accuses Columbia University of treason. Obama never went to the school.
Posted on 01/11/2010 5:35:53 PM PST by Mozilla
click here to read article
Sadly, I'm beginning to wonder about Pastor Manning's sanity. The allegation against Columbia is very serious, accusing them of selling Soetoro/Obama a degree.
That drek may have been generated by a societ operative and given to Barry for forwarding to publication as yet another piece of fabricating his ‘history at Columbia’. Nothing about this affirmative action lying bastard in the White House is as it appears. Nothing!
Nada. That twerp didn't write that!
Not to worry, I posted it below.
I'm very aware of the massive voids in his history. It stinketh . . . Nonetheless, if Rev. Manning is serious about going after Columbia I hope he has more than suspicions, or he won't get far.
Community organizing. On the job training.
OK. Extremely crazy. Alleging Columbia allowed him to claim he attended when he didn’t to cover up time allegedly spent in the ME is ridiculous.
He may not have attended Columbia...but a school in Russia...no one not one person remembers him AT ALL...at Columbia...something is very very fishy about the impostor and Columbia University.
God Bless the good Pastor.
It just isn’t natural how those two men are sitting together.
That is kind of creepy, that photo.
What a model student.
Count the fingers on the hand/s on the Paki’s knee. More than one hand there. Snuggle bunnies.
The hearts are a nice touch.
I never noticed the fingers before. Thanks for pointing that out. Can’t tell for sure. Need a higher quality image.
There was a thread or two a while ago whereon people including maggief (hope I got her name right) blew it up and you could count NINE fingers on that hand/s on the Paki’s knee.
They’re holding hands.
Our current commander in chief should be referred to as ‘Thing’ until we find out who he really is and where he came from.
I wonder if he ever registered for the Draft,,,,,I bet not.
Your reaching for something that isn’t there. Good luck with that.
Hey Rahm. How are you?
It looks to me like Barry has his left hand on his own thigh. That said, I don't know any (sober) straight guys who would sit that close together, at least not American guys. Very odd image.
Are those the rest of Obama's fingers under his right boot?
Manning is getting more traction than orly taitz. Manning invented the MacDaddy epithet for you know who.
Thanks for the ping to this, Lucy!
A lot of people on this thread are dismissing what Manning is saying because he named Al Qaeda and they weren’t organized until 1988 (at least not *officially*). I hope people read this, and understand what Manning is saying is entirely possible. He could be referring to the group that eventually became the *main* Al Qaeda branch under Bin Laden himself, or any number of smaller groups/camps in operation at that time (and still today).
Al Qaeda as an organization may not have officially declared itself as such until 1988, but there is no doubt there were many radical Islamic terrorist groups in existence WAY before that. Al Qaeda itself is, shall we say, a “Parent Corporation” - an “organizing group” much like some of the liberal political organizing groups we see here in the US. It is actually made up of many smaller radical groups throughout the world (Some groups incidentally being in Kenya, Indonesia, Afghanistan & Pakistan - just to name a few places).
Not all of these smaller groups even acknowledge their links to Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood, but they are there. Al Qaeda is like a “Networking Group”, and they supply funds, and materials for these smaller groups. These groups may look to Al Qaeda for leadership and their spiritual guidance in their jihad, but they exist on their own as well....
I hope I explained this well enough. All one has to do is go to the State Dept. Webpage, or do a google search for [IIRC - it’s been a long time since I visited the site] the “Terrorist Encyclopedia” or perhaps the “Terrorism Encyclopedia” and you will have access to more information on known terrorist groups than you can imagine.
Now, I don’t know if Manning is right or wrong about these charges. Perhaps he has found some kind of evidence that he is not revealing at this point? I’d like to give him the benefit of the doubt - for all the outspoken-ness and his willingness to put his reputation, freedom and life on the line I think he at least deserves the benefit of a doubt on this action, IMHO.
I do admit that it’s hard for me to see how he could sue a college and charge them with treason — that’s a criminal charge, not one to be heard in Civil Courts (at least that’s my non-lawyer beliefs on this — meaning I could be wrong). I will say I haven’t watched the video yet (computer isn’t liking it right now.) So, maybe he explains all of those things in his video - could be. :)
Now, I’m aware of a trip Obama took to PAKISTAN supposedly during this time, but this is the first I’ve heard mention of Afghanistan, personally. IIRC, Obama spoke of this trip in his book and said he was visiting the family of his college roommate there (can’t remember if it was a roommate from Occidental, or Colombia).
I know it was definitely Pakistan that he admitted to visiting right around this time. Which honestly makes me hope Manning has his ducks in a row on this and isn’t making a fatal error by mixing up the country! On the other hand, for all we know Obama could very well have traveled to Afghanistan FROM Pakistan during that time. If one was going to attend a terrorist training camp it was probably the route of choice, frankly... Slip over the border, no passport needed — especially if you were seeking entrance to a terrorist training camp. Perhaps Manning has found a former terrorist or something that remembers Obama going to “camp” with him and is a little miffed at him for not completely abandoning the US’s support for Israel, and going up against Iran??? I suppose stranger things have happened.
There are definitely people out there in the world that know Barack’s secrets. He will eventually tick off the wrong person and his house of cards will come tumbling down around him (at least I pray that will be the case, and sooner vs. later).
I posted a comment at #176 you may be interested in. It’s probably stuff you both already know, though...
If I’m not mistaken the guy in the picture Siddiqui(sp?) is the one I was referring to in my post - the one who he went with to Pakistan to visit his family during the summer break (or something like that according to Obama’s book).
Sadly, people are going to dismiss a lot of what Manning is saying because he used the name “Al Qaeda” which wasn’t *officially* an entity until 1988. What people are forgetting is that Al Qaeda (like the Muslim Brotherhood) are made up of many smaller groups - some that existed way before the *organization* really got started by Bin Laden. It’s not as if he was doing nothing before 1988 though...
Then again, most of the people I see on this thread that are dismissing Manning’s charges are the same folks who consistently dismiss any and all charges against Obama that are even remotely related to Certifigate... So, it’s not surprising really that they would be here saying these things on this thread... I don’t know if Manning is right or wrong on these particular charges, but I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for the time being. JMHO.
[Hope you both are doing well. :) ]
I meant post #126, not 176 — sorry about that. The post I refer to is actually directly before the one I sent to the two of you. :)
GO MANNING GO!
LOL. An "atheist Muslim." That's a new one. Where did you get it? Was it listed as an example under oxymoron in the dictionary?
I seriously doubt it. A typical graduating class was around 700 students (it's more now). It's very unlikely anyone, even someone social enough to be elected class president, would personally know everyone in the class.
This is especially true of commuter students, like Obama, who lived off campus and didn't participate much in extracurricular activities.
Nope. No college is.
Americans were certainly allowed to travel to Pakistan then. The State Department merely issued an advisory that Americans needed to get a 30-day visa before they arrived. That has morphed into an internet rumor that there was a travel ban.
Thanks, Liberty Rocks. I also share your thoughts as a definite possibility. And some people may think Manning is nuts because of his demeanor but I think he is a brave man, also a possibility he may have evidence he is not detailing.
I hope you are well, too!
(My motto: Never a dull moment.)
If he takes them to court and they are not allowed to release any records, what's the expected outcome?
The same outcome that can be expected in all these crazy birther lawsuits: dismissal.
I sure he has.
I'm also sure he owns a certain bridge in New York that you might be interested in buying.
They are holding hands.
I’m not going to dismiss anything until it is proven false. I wouldn’t put anything past the usurper in chief. I know he is hiding things in his past and present. Many have already been exposed. It’s only a matter of time before he is busted.
Your profile page is full of incorrect statements, propaganda and lies. You belong over at DU or KOS. You’re one of them.
I wonder where one becomes ‘an economist’ who cannot spell simple words and has so little objectivity?
This is before the bongs were popular???
“I dont know if Manning is right or wrong on these particular charges, but Im willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for the time being.”
Many of us who yawn at this stuff are not as swayed by conspiratorial speculation as others. When this type of stuff is posted about Sarah Palin or any conservative you care to name, we are rightly dismissive. Post about BHO or WJC and we allow conspiracy on top of innuendo on top of speculation. Facts seem to be the missing ingredient. It’s as interesting as a Charlie Sheen lecture on 9/11.
Shilling for 0bama will get you nowhere, other than high fives from other shills.
0bama and Clinton have shady backgrounds, associations and leftist ideologies. They are not the same kind of people as Palin, for instance.
Your boy is going to go down, hard. Too many people know crap about him and sooner or later, the dam will break. Ha ha.