Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ideologue: Barack Obama’s no Bill Clinton.
Weekly Standard ^ | February 8, 2010 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 01/30/2010 8:20:31 AM PST by reaganaut1

President Obama’s greatest need is to escape the ideological grip of congressional Democrats and the liberal base of the Democratic party (they’re one and the same). But he either doesn’t recognize this or, as a conventional liberal himself, isn’t so inclined. This self-inflicted difficulty has put Obama in worse political straits than President Clinton faced after the Republican landslide of 1994.

Certainly there was nothing in Obama’s State of the Union address last week to indicate he understands the fix he’s in or has devised a credible way to get out of it. His message, though he didn’t put it in quite these words, was that he’d rather fight for unpopular liberal policies than switch to broadly appealing centrist ones.

A bad omen for Obama and Democrats was the pleased-as-punch response of Capitol Hill’s top Republican, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. “It makes my job a little easier than if he were moving to the middle and picking up people,” McConnell says. “I naïvely thought he was going to do a course correction.”

McConnell characterizes the Obama strategy as: “Ignore the public, we know what’s best, full speed ahead.” The practical effect is to yield the political high ground to Republicans. “He can call us the party of no till he’s blue in the face,” McConnell says. “It depends on what you’re saying no to.”

When the president had lunch with television anchors at the White House the day of the speech, he minimized his political distress. Were the rate of unemployment two points lower, he’d be in fine shape, Obama suggested. That’s probably true. And if pigs had wings they could fly.

Since the Republican Senate victory in Massachusetts [...] and the collapse of Obama’s domestic agenda, the parallels between Obama now and Clinton in 1994 have [become clear.]

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2010; 2010midterms; democrats; fredbarnes; obama

1 posted on 01/30/2010 8:20:31 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
President Obama’s greatest need is to escape the ideological grip of congressional Democrats and the liberal base of the Democratic party (they’re one and the same).

Fred, you don't seriously think he's in THEIR grip, do you?

2 posted on 01/30/2010 8:25:24 AM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The Ideologue: Barack Obama’s no Bill Clinton.

In other words, the first black president is not like the first black president.

3 posted on 01/30/2010 8:26:53 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Until this post i had forgotten Obama is a black man


4 posted on 01/30/2010 8:29:55 AM PST by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Barnes has Beltway Blindness. They are too close to see the forest for the trees.
5 posted on 01/30/2010 8:30:31 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Reminding people of Clinton’s “success” in passing NAFTA, a Republican agenda item, isn’t a good thing. Much of the trouble with the American economy tracks back to that.


6 posted on 01/30/2010 8:33:18 AM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickadee
I agree with that, much as it hurts.

BTW-according to the article in Weekly Standard (above), it would seem uhbama certainly thinks the press corp anchors are a great big bunch of air headed stupidty.

Wow did he ever insult their intelligence (of course, maybe he is right-maybe they are all dunderheads....but to say there would be no problem if unemployment was just two points lower is ASTOUNDING! I wonder if ANY of the anchors had the cajones to LAUGH HEARTILY at that one?)

7 posted on 01/30/2010 8:43:31 AM PST by Republic (I really love Rush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Republic

I don’t think the anchors go there (Obama) to hear the truth. They already know what the truth is. They go there to see the next daring move on the high wire, the next magic trick, the next dazzling misdirection. Just as with Clinton, they will start to tell us what an unerring sense of politics he has. For them it’s all about the political theater. We don’t matter . . . that’s been patently obvious for some time.


8 posted on 01/30/2010 8:50:48 AM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama is Clinton II

Obama — History as a coke user
Clinton — History as a coke user

Obama — Running all over the world apologizing for America
Clinton — Running all over the world apologizing for slavery

Obama — Obamacare
Clinton — Hillary care

Obama —in Bed with Ayers
Clinton —leads anti American protest in England Hillary in Bed with Black Panthers

Obama — Fake photo ops with returning military caskets
Clinton — Fake building of a cross on DDay Beach and Fake finding a flag at WWII cemetery in
Europe

Obama — New gun control from Holder
Clinton — Brady Bill and Assault Weapons Ban

Obama — Taking 3 months to decide on new troops
Clinton — Denying Armor in Samolia

Obama — Enemies List
Clinton — Filegate

Obama disses SCOTUS in SOTU speech
Clinton—SCOTUS boycotts SOTU and disbars Clinton

Obama — Playing Golf while waiting to decide on troops in Afganistan
Clinton — Playing golf and not taking the phone call to take out Bin Laden
USS Cole—Kabul Towers—Attempted asassination of Fomer pres Bush
Responds with Tomahawk missles at radrar sites an aspirin factory

Obama — Blaming Fox News Rush Limbaugh Glenn Beck
Clinton — Blaming Talk Radio for Oke City and blaming Fox News and Wash Times

Obama — No Middle Class Taxes —Gonna get a tax increase
Clinton Promised Middle Class Tax Cut instead new Tax Bill

Obama — Promised Most Transparent administration in history — Least transparent
Clinton — Promised most ethical administration in history —most corrupt

Obama — Everybody’s fault but his
Clinton — Everybody’s fault but his

Clinton — IRS auditing of all major Conservative Organizations
Obama — April ain’t here yet

Clinton —WACO
—Secrets to the Chicoms
—Lincoln Bedroom rent out
—Pay for trade plane ride
Whitewater
—Monicagate
—Gays in the Military
—Abortion
—Wrong War in the Balkans
— Groundwork for 911(Berger steals proof )
—Pardons Puerto Rican Terrorists
—Pardons Marc Rich
—Rapegate
—Gropegate
— Loots the WH
—Loathes the military
Obama — Gay Czars
—Abortion
-—Moves detainees from Gitmo
—Civilian trial for 911
—Gays in the military

Obama — Ruins economy with spending
Clinton— Lays groundwork for Mortgage Melt Down —Raises taxes ( but gets bailed out with
Greenspan fed rate cuts )

Clinton—Campaigns for losing candidates
Obama —Campaigns for losing candidates

Clinton—We are not getting our message out
Obama —We are not getting our message out

Clinton — 1994 GOP takes Congress
Obama — Starts 1 yr early with 3 big losses his FIRST year


9 posted on 01/30/2010 8:54:55 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

Actually NAFTA is necessarily a bad thing, but when Mexico and other so-called partners aren’t willing to reciprocally lower their tariffs on US products it makes NAFTA bad policy.


10 posted on 01/30/2010 8:57:16 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
No disrespect to the fans of Fred Barnes out there, but this is incredibly lazy partisan writing (typical for both sides). With no effort at all, I can make this a standard Dem piece about George W. Bush (my changes are in all caps).

President BUSH's greatest need is to escape the ideological grip of congressional REPUBLICANS and the CONSERVATIVE base of the REPUBLICAN party (they’re one and the same). But he either doesn’t recognize this or, as a conventional CONSERVATIVE himself, isn’t so inclined. This self-inflicted difficulty has put BUSH in worse political straits than HIS FATHER, President GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH faced after RENEGING ON HIS *NO NEW TAXES* PROMISE.

Voila! Easy peasy, fill-in-the-blanks opinion writing. I wonder if iPhone has an app for that?

11 posted on 01/30/2010 9:06:36 AM PST by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittykat77

YOu seriously think that spew you posted will affect anyone?


12 posted on 01/30/2010 9:35:37 AM PST by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Barack Obama: “I’m no ideologue. Ignore that volume of Marx and Engels on my bookshelf. It’s next to Maos’s “Little Red Book,” and Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals.”


13 posted on 01/30/2010 10:08:54 AM PST by driftless2 (for long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"His message, though he didn’t put it in quite these words, was that he’d rather fight for unpopular liberal policies than switch to broadly appealing centrist ones.

". . . response of Capitol Hill’s top Republican, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. “It makes my job a little easier than if he were moving to the middle and picking up people,” McConnell says. “I naïvely thought he was going to do a course correction.”

These two paragraphs are revealing, and Republicans who are truly "conservative" in their world view need to think deeply about what is revealed.

Here, we have a President whose ideology is so deeply ingrained and whose commitment to that ideology is so intense that he is not willing to abandon or compromise that commitment.

On the other hand, we have people whose response to that intensity is an apparent willingness to "negotiate" and "compromise" on issues, if the other side will just agree to it. Some claim that is admirable; but, if it pertains to compromising on the very principles of liberty they are sworn to protect, is it really admirable?

They call themselves "conservatives," which is supposed to mean "conserving," or "preserving" the ideas which made this nation free and prosperous.

Conservatives should be spending their time studying and articulating the Founders' revolutionary ideas, dedicating themselves to those ideas, and committing themselves to the same principles the Founders were willing to die for. If they did so, they might be successful in a contest with the so-called "progressives," like Obama, who are willing to put their political futures on the line to "change" America from the strictly-limited constitutional government of "the People" to government by self-designated imperfect men and women who consider themselves worthy of possessing power over the lives and fortunes of other people.

14 posted on 01/30/2010 11:01:56 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

LOL — well it affected you!

Hey, Fred Barnes is, well, not lazy, but come on..... The guy’s been cranking this stuff out for decades. We need some new blood. I’m tired of looking at and reading stuff by all these gray, wrinkled, tired-looking old farts who were gray, wrinkled, tired-looking old farts during Reagan’s second term in office.


15 posted on 01/30/2010 12:16:36 PM PST by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
“He can call us the party of no till he’s blue in the face,” McConnell says. “It depends on what you’re saying no to.”

Good one.

16 posted on 01/30/2010 10:08:19 PM PST by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("The first unintended victim of almost every government program is common sense." - Ari David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson