Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Brown Doesn’t Rule Out 2012 Presidential Bid (WTH??)
Breitbart ^ | 1/31/10 | staff

Posted on 01/31/2010 11:39:15 AM PST by pissant

Scott Brown Doesn’t Rule Out 2012 Presidential Bid

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.tv ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; brown2012; democrats; elections; gop; idiot; republicans; scottbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last
To: Reagan Man

I just told you that Reagan and Bush and Bush II were all pro-life. Why haven’t their Judicial nominees voided Roe V. Wade???

Reagan even nominated Sandra Day O Connor who was pro=choice.

Please answer my question . . do not avoid it.


201 posted on 01/31/2010 6:01:20 PM PST by MarkAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Sparky1776

Likely more than two. I’m already sick of it.


202 posted on 01/31/2010 6:01:26 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I was being kind :)


203 posted on 01/31/2010 6:01:54 PM PST by Sparky1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: MarkAccord

I’ve already answered your dumb question once, newbie.

It takes five justices, four won’t do it!


204 posted on 01/31/2010 6:04:09 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing

You’re right. No candidate gets a pass. There’s always “something” and several someone’s to remind us of that particular candidate’s short comings, however small, large or rumored.


205 posted on 01/31/2010 6:07:21 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito . That adds up to five.

Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned (which any legal expert will tell you is very unlikely), how will that effect anything? A woman would just have to go across the state line to a pro-choice state.


206 posted on 01/31/2010 6:08:20 PM PST by MarkAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Sparky1776

Yes, I know. You’re always kind.


207 posted on 01/31/2010 6:08:53 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: MarkAccord

Follow the thread and pay attention.

Kennedy is pro-abortion and has been for years. The objective is to overturn Roe, return the issue back to the states and work at getting passage of a Human Life or personhood amendment to the Constitution.


208 posted on 01/31/2010 6:14:31 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: MarkAccord

I don’t think you’re a serious poster when it comes to the discussion of Roe v Wade or you would know that Justice Roberts signaled earlier that week that he is not necessarily driven by stare decisis.


209 posted on 01/31/2010 6:16:21 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Did you not post that if we elect “pro-life” Presidents, we will thus have Roe v. Wade overturned? Reagan nominated pro-choice O’Conner and Kennedy. Bush I nominated Souter. And Bush II tried to nominated Harriet Myers, who is pro-choice.

I will take my chances with Scott Brown- Michelle Bachmann ticket.


210 posted on 01/31/2010 6:17:16 PM PST by MarkAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: MarkAccord

Bunch of red herrings. O’Conner and Souter are no longer on the high court and Myers never made it. Kennedy was pro-life when Reagan appointed him but since then has shifted to pro-abort. We need one more conservative on the SCOTUS to overturn Roe. Wake up!

Scott Brown is an abortion proponent and supports Roe. I seriously doubt Michelle Bachman would run with Brown and if she did, they would not get my vote.


211 posted on 01/31/2010 6:24:30 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: MarkAccord

Pay attention, please!

Neither Scott Brown, nor Michelle Bachmann are running for the nomination and for that matter, nobody else is either!

Not yet, anyway.


212 posted on 01/31/2010 6:25:13 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

“Souter is no longer on the High Court.”

Yes he is . His name is now Sotomyer . . that is who replaced him.

Souter deliberately waited until Obama was inaugurated before resigning his seat.

I also like the McDonnell-Brown ticket. McDonnel is the Virginia Governor.


213 posted on 01/31/2010 6:37:18 PM PST by MarkAccord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: MarkAccord
Sotomyer was appointed by Obama! Souter is gone.

Gov Bob McDonnell is a staunch pro-life conservative and man of integrity. I doubt he would team up with anyone who does not believe in the sanctity of unborn life.

214 posted on 01/31/2010 6:43:16 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Why did you ping me with this when I didn’t say anything bad about him and don’t need to be reprimanded like a child?


215 posted on 01/31/2010 6:45:50 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Exactly


216 posted on 01/31/2010 8:05:23 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Leave the guy alone. He has not been seated yet.

Note: Conservative talkers who are true blue and not RINOs. Rush, Savage, Levin (I think), Hannity (I think), Liddy, Savage, Malzberg, Cunningham, Dennis Miller (I think) and a few others who are not making fun of “birthers.”

I agree on both points...

217 posted on 01/31/2010 8:25:58 PM PST by nutmeg (Congratulations Senator-elect Scott Brown!!! Gas up the truck!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: norge
I also like post #72 from the little enchilada.

Yup... same here! ;-)

218 posted on 01/31/2010 8:26:56 PM PST by nutmeg (Congratulations Senator-elect Scott Brown!!! Gas up the truck!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
I tried to post much much earlier in the thread saying precisely what you said but just then FR went down.

Yeah, FR has sure been having problems lately... it's been down quite a bit in the past few days.

I watched the tape and felt the title was misleading at best. The fact he said he ‘didn’t even have a business card yet’ subtly told Walters how preposterous the supposition was IMHO.

Exactly. ;-)

219 posted on 01/31/2010 9:04:12 PM PST by nutmeg (Congratulations Senator-elect Scott Brown!!! Gas up the truck!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: tioga; Frantzie; norge; RaceBannon
very cool report.

Thanks, tioga. Here's a more detailed "after action report" of those 3 rallies, if you're interested:

After action report - Scott Brown rallies – Monday, 1/18/10

...and another very cool "after action report" by my FRiend RaceBannon:

RaceBannon’s after action report - Scott Brown rally - Sunday, 1/17/10

Again, I DO want to stress that I don't know Scott Brown personally, just met him at these rallies. He seems like the Real Deal to me, and was humbled by the thousands of supporters that came out to participate in his rallies on election eve.

We'll have to see how he does in DC. And - yes - like all of the other elected officials - we should hold his feet to the fire.

220 posted on 01/31/2010 9:17:19 PM PST by nutmeg (Congratulations Senator-elect Scott Brown!!! Gas up the truck!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson