Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

I have been on both sides of Air Force systems contracting. I can say that most overruns are caused by chasing new changes. The EC (engineering change) process is guaranteed to increase cost. There was on Army program that went on for over a decade and never produced anything because of constant changes chasing new improvements.


4 posted on 02/03/2010 10:59:21 PM PST by Eaglefixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eaglefixer

PS All changes must be approved by the program manager.


6 posted on 02/03/2010 11:00:45 PM PST by Eaglefixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Eaglefixer

I can say that most overruns are caused by chasing new changes. The EC (engineering change) process is guaranteed to increase cost.


You are 110% correct there. Some defense contractors are masters at coming up with ECPs that are guaranteed to beget more ECPs. I worked a program with Boeing like this. They would propose impossible (laughable) schedules, but it was just what our promotion-hungry PM wanted to hear. For a good while, the schedule volatility was unbelievable and Boeing was laughing all the way to the bank. And....the PM was replaced, incidentally.


8 posted on 02/04/2010 4:33:59 AM PST by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson