Autry endorses Fiorina for Boxer's Senate seat

FResno Bee ^ | 2/12/10 | John Ellis

[cricket]

My point though was this started out talking about Autry’s endorsement, but Autry quickly disappeared from the discussion.

LOL. . .forgot about that; simply responded with a correction/defense re Fiorina per her at least, 'official' pro-life position. . .and by shared associations with McCain; mentioned 'S----h'.

That said; does not take much to get off track with many who; despite S----h's political associations; will not tolerate her name mentioned with any of them

And yes, back to Carly and endorsement and it's impact. . .

[SoConPubbie]

Your head must explode with all the props. What do you do with more than one issue? Complexity of an issue is obviously waaaaaay beyond your capability. Do you justify killing babies when a women is raped? Is that ok or not?

Your kidding right?

You believe that the rape of a woman gives that woman the right to MURDER the baby?

You really need to take a look at your values.

The so-called complexity of this issue is a function of your lack of resoluteness where morality is concerned.

There is not complexity, only you wanting to give somebody an excuse for not handling a horrible situation in a manner that is righteous.

With the banality of your position, you promote the emotional well-being of the mother above the life of the baby.

Where is your conscience?

[SoConPubbie]

As for Litmus test; abortion is an imaginary 'freedom' of choice. It is not a liberation. It IS a stealing of life; and worse; IMHO. That said; while I think those who support abortion share an ignorance; do not'necessarily' think it is a malevolent ignorance. Nor is it 'always'. There are many, of course, for whom it is both. McCain is pro-life; but can we measure his commitment per 'depth'; say against that of Sarah Palin's. (No; but do need to. ..it did not matter; and it was other RINO issues; in any event or just an 'issue' that defeated McCain.

Ignorance?

Only if you believe people are truly stupid.

You don't agree to the killing of a baby, unborn or not, and not be aware of your choice.

God gave everyone a conscience.

And I can guarantee you, any politician who gets into the ring has had a chance to thoroughly vet their positions in their own minds.

Weak excuse on your part.

[cricket]

I ‘measure’ evil by levels of ignorance.

[byteback]

But YOU on the other hand would not vote for a person who believes that partial birth abortion should be outlawed because she doesn't go the the full way. YOU would ratherhave a woman in office who SUPPORTS partial birth abortion.

Where are YOUR morals???????????????

[SoConPubbie]

But YOU on the other hand would not vote for a person who believes that partial birth abortion should be outlawed because she doesn't go the the full way. YOU would ratherhave a woman in office who SUPPORTS partial birth abortion. Where are YOUR morals???????????????

Since Partial-Birth Abortion is a very limited procedure, there are very few done in the US in comparison to the total, what have you gained?

Not much.

And while I applaud Whitman on this little movement on her part in the right position, she still is in support of a position that allows for the Murder of un-born children.

This qualifies as a distinction without difference, and I dare say, is mere political posturing on the part of a politician who still thinks it is ok to murder a baby probably up till either the final month or something less.

She is still a moral-less person.

Sorry, put up a candidate who is more main-stream Pro-Life, much as Fiorina is now presenting herself as, and you might actually have had a point.