President Palin?

The Salt Lake City Tribune ^ | February 12, 2010 | Robyn Blumner

[JApost]

Reagan was stiff and haltingly inarticulate in press conferences and in interviews. He would have been mocked and ridiculed in today’s 24 hour media.

[JApost]

If this dumb lazy liberal hag would read or watch the O’Reilly-Palin interview back in November she wouldn't have embarrassed herself by writing this. Palin discussed in detail questions re Iran sanctions, Russia, China, etc. She probably knows this but wanted to dishonestly mislead and influence her uninformed readers.

[glorgau]

the answer President Barack Obama gave at a news conference... which is too long to reprint verbatim

Long answers are most often meant to obfuscate an issue.

[stevem]

By now she should be prepared, particularly since she quit her day job. But she's not. While her written remarks at the Tea Party were intelligible, her performance during the question period demonstrated that Palin has no command of issues and has little to offer beyond platitudinous and confused rhetoric.

The gender is wrong, but this does describe our President.

[Phantom4]

It’s really sad. We have come to the place in our country’s history where the most important factor in considering a presidential candidate is simply whether his/her heart’s in the right place, as it were. Palin loves this country. She is teachable, and she has enough sense to find advisors who love the country more than they love their own career. In a different era, I might wish for someone who seems more conversant with the issues, but not right now, not at this time when so many Dems want to “transform the system.” Like Beck, I just won’t a President who won’t lie to me.

Palin’s experience as governor suggets that she “won’t blink” when things get stressful, like Obama does when his teleprompter malfunctions. Of all the people I have heard, she is the one who I think is least likely to drink from the Potomac, and would remain an “outsider” at heart.

[sergeantdave]

Typical left wing broom flyer who lives in the ad hominem pig sty.

[Bob J]

“Most of our problems today need a conservative solution that isn’t heavy on detail.”

Well, then Sarah is your man.

[Bob J]

All I can say is in 2012, I “hopey” we don’t “changey” to this embarrassing woman.

“Opinion: The author just lost her 15 moments of fame with that unprofessional, petulant and catty bottom line.”

Yes, anyone who would make a statement like that is definitely unprofessional, petulant and catty.

[ETL]

Sorry! Posted to wrong thread!!

[Friendofgeorge]

This business that Sarah was not, and is not up on the issues, has been fabricated.

And No, Sarah did not admit to not being up on the issues in her interview with Crissy Wallace, as some have stated she said.

Her answer was, hell yes, I know more than I did 2 years ago. She went on to say that she was focused more on issue of Alaska when she was at first approached to being the VP nominee, but at no time did she say that she was not up on the issues. She said she knows more than she did 2 years ago, well, I hope we all do!

[Friendofgeorge]

I think Sarah should hold press conferences, instead of going on Today and or Meet the Press. She could hold weekly press conferences when/if she runs for President. Take any and all questions on her terms etc, and I think she would be great.

[fporretto]

Miss Blumner's column is a fine demonstration of why we don't allow a committee of "journalists" to select the president.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Eternity Road

[C.Contreras1]

I will wait and see what candidates come forth, especially which candidate the T.E.A. Party Movement endorses.

[RipSawyer]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnS49c9KZw8